1 / 24

Selective Surface Modification of Biopolymers

Selective Surface Modification of Biopolymers. REU Progress Presentation Presented by Alicia Certain Advisor Jeffrey Youngblood August 4, 2004. Polymers vs. Biopolymers. Familiar examples: garbage bags, milk jugs, car bumpers, motor oil, carpet fibers, plumbing pipes

matsu
Télécharger la présentation

Selective Surface Modification of Biopolymers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Selective Surface Modification of Biopolymers REU Progress Presentation Presented by Alicia Certain Advisor Jeffrey Youngblood August 4, 2004

  2. Polymers vs. Biopolymers • Familiar examples: garbage bags, milk jugs, car bumpers, motor oil, carpet fibers, plumbing pipes • Biopolymers: The “green” materials • Made from renewable resources • Biodegradable • Have different properties than traditional polymers

  3. Wettability and Applications • An increase in wettability would be desirable for applications such as textiles, cleaning wipes, household fabrics • A decrease in wettability would be desired for packaging

  4. The First Biopolymer • Family of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) • Worked with poly(lactic acid) (PLA) • Trade name “Natureworks” • Produced from corn

  5. The Next Polymer • From the family of 1,3, propanediol • Specific polymer is poly(propylene-terephthalate) (PPT) • Trade name “Sorona” • Also comes from corn

  6. Modification of Biopolymers • Samples were spin coated onto glass slides • Goal was to modify the surface of the polymers in order to change wettability • Worked with three chemical modifications • APTES • Hydrolysis • Aminolysis

  7. APTES modification • 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane • Previously used to modify PET • Increased wettability • What will it do to biopolymers?

  8. Hydrolysis • Immersion in aqueous alkaline base • Breaks up chain, adding hydroxyl group to one end, hydrogen to the other • Should increase wettability • Simplest procedure

  9. Aminolysis • Similar to hydrolysis, using an amine instead • Tried n-butylamine, which is known to increase wettability in PET – very slow! • Used n-lithiodiamine to decrease reaction times

  10. Contact Angle Analysis • Liquid drop on solid surface modifies its shape based on the interfacial tensions • Creates a material property of the system called the “contact angle”

  11. Characterization • Contact angle measurements primary characterization • Tests done through the goniometer • AFM imaging used to augment

  12. Wettability Results

  13. Untreated PLA

  14. 2 minutes

  15. 15 minutes

  16. Optimal Times

  17. Wettability Results

  18. Contact Angles 30 minutes 15 minutes 45 minutes

  19. Wettability Results

  20. Wettability Results

  21. PPT and APTES • Most successful in decreasing wettability • 6 hours led to approx. 55 degree advancing, 0 receding • 24 hours led to approx. 45 degree advancing, 0 receding • 72 hours created an increase back to approx. 60 advancing, 0 receding

  22. Flourinated APTES • 24 hour APTES reaction on PLA with concentration cut in half • Subsequent reaction with tridecaflouro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrooctyltri-chlorosilane • APTES on PLA only increases wettability slightly, but surface is functionalized and flourination successfully decreases wettability

  23. Possible Future Directions • APTES optimization • Pinpointing a more definite optimum PLA hydrolysis time • Vapor phase reactions • Subsequent reactions on functionalized surfaces to increase hydrophobicity rather than decrease

  24. Thanks! Prof. Youngblood and Prof. Kvam John, Ben, and Phil Allen and Kendra The REU Group

More Related