1 / 10

VCE INTERNATIONAL STUDIES

VCE INTERNATIONAL STUDIES. UNIT 3 OUTCOME 2 GLOBAL CONFLICTS. CAUSES OF TERRORISM. Causes of terrorism are disputed but probably arises from a combination of factors: Ideological e. g . IRA aims for a united Ireland. Al-Qaeda aims for Islamic caliphate by 2016 Strategic

maude
Télécharger la présentation

VCE INTERNATIONAL STUDIES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. VCE INTERNATIONAL STUDIES UNIT 3 OUTCOME 2 GLOBAL CONFLICTS

  2. CAUSES OF TERRORISM • Causes of terrorism are disputed but probably arises from a combination of factors: • Ideological e. g. IRA aims for a united Ireland. Al-Qaeda aims for Islamic caliphate by 2016 • Strategic When diplomacy breaks down or fails to deliver. IRA has political and military wings. When political pressure is insufficient terror is used. • Psychological Response to injustice, persecution, repression, poverty, deprivation, means of hitting back, taking revenge. This could also include cultural antipathy, the “clash of civilisations”.

  3. Terrorist attack • Madrid Train bombing (2004) Response by the state involved • General election followed soon after bombing. Party that promised to withdraw Spanish troops from Iraq was elected. Spain withdrew troops. International response • International response was mixed. Groups who had opposed the invasion of Iraq saw this terrorist attack as proof that US unilateralism and spurious justifications for the pre-emptive invasion of Iraq would only serve to fuel the passions of Islamist extremists. • On the other hand there were calls by leaders in US, UK and Australia to “stay the course” and not be intimidated into withdrawing from the war on terror.

  4. TERRORIST ATTACK Rationale for attack given by terrorist(s)/group/organisation • Desire to frighten “Coalition of the Willing” states, supporting US in Iraq into withdrawing. • Al-Qaeda linked Islamist group responsible, presumably sharing ultimate goal of Islamic caliphate.

  5. What makes a state a “superpower”? Factors which contribute to a state being a superpower. • Size of its economy. • Military capacity • Cultural influence • Whether it is challenged for power by other states • Perceived legitimacy. (Authority it derives from being democratic, just and supportive of human rights etc.)

  6. LIMITATIONS ON u.s. POWER Three limitations on US power. • Limitations • US military not geared to fight non-state opponents. (asymmetrical conflict) • US has limited understanding of social, cultural and political contexts of conflicts. • West is not united in support of US. • US has to manage many competing interests. It is involved in many conflicts and is in danger of spreading its influence too thinly.

  7. EXPLANATION OF THE MILITARY LIMITATION • a) US high tech weaponry might be effective in destroying major infrastructure and military targets but is not necessarily a match for a band of suicide bombers hijacking a plane armed only with pen knives! • b) US underestimated the breadth and depth of Iraqi opposition to American interference. They expected Iraqis to be universally grateful to them for removing the tyrant Saddam and to enthusiastically embrace democracy. They were wrong! • c) US has antagonised EU by not signing Kyoto or to International Criminal Court (ICC). Also, now that threat from Soviet Union has disappeared EU feels freer and less dependent on US for security. • d) The war in Iraq alone has cost $400 billion already and looks like costing a lot more. The psychological drain on the American people (2000 dead, growing anti-US sentiment, no end in sight) may also be seen as a limitation on US power.

  8. Evaluation of success of U.S. In “war on terror” since iraq invasion in 2003 • Taliban regime in Afghanistan has lost power. • Many of Al-Qaeda’s Afghan leaders have been removed. • General democratic elections were held in Afghanistan in 2005. • Pakistan (which had also harboured terrorists) is now cooperating with the US. • Libya has abandoned its WMD program. • Brutal dictator Saddam Hussein has been removed from power. • Western oil supplies are now more secure (since the removal of the Taliban and Saddam.) • The Kurdish people in northern Iraq now have much greater autonomy and security.

  9. Cont’d... • US invasion has galvanised Islamists from many countries to fight against the US occupation of Arab lands. Iraq has become a breeding ground for international terrorism. • The Internet has become a major instrument of inspiration, recruitment and training for a new generation of Islamist militants. • The National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) the joint work of 16 US agencies reported in 2006 that the Iraq war was “fuelling the spread of the jihadist movement”.

  10. Cont’d... • US is also losing the “battle for hearts and minds” in the West with 36% of people in the EUs largest member states saying that the US is the greatest threat to world security. (30% of respondents cited Iran as the world’s greatest threat.) • The US (like Australia) has enacted legislation domestic anti-terrorist legislation which restricts the rights and liberties of its own citizens. This must be seen as a cost. • US has not accorded prisoners taken in the War on Terror with rights under Geneva Convention. This diminishes US standing in the international community and must be seen a negative outcome.

More Related