1 / 18

Hard Probe - Medium Interactions in 3D-Hydrodynamics

Hard Probe - Medium Interactions in 3D-Hydrodynamics. Steffen A. Bass. Duke University. Relativistic Fluid Dynamics Hybrid Macro+Micro Transport flavor dependent freeze-out Hard-Probes I: Jet-Quenching Hard-Probes II: Heavy Quarks. in collaboration with: M. Asakawa B. Mueller

maxima
Télécharger la présentation

Hard Probe - Medium Interactions in 3D-Hydrodynamics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hard Probe - Medium Interactions in 3D-Hydrodynamics Steffen A. Bass Duke University Relativistic Fluid Dynamics Hybrid Macro+Micro Transport flavor dependent freeze-out Hard-Probes I: Jet-Quenching Hard-Probes II: Heavy Quarks in collaboration with: • M. Asakawa • B. Mueller • C. Nonaka • T. Renk • J. Ruppert Steffen A. Bass

  2. The Great Wall • Heavy-ion collisions at RHIC have produced a state of matter which behaves similar to an ideal fluid • (3+1)D Relativistic Fluid Dynamics and hybrid macro+micro models are highly successful in describing the dynamics of bulk QCD matter • Jet energy-loss calculations have reached a high level of technical sophistication (BDMPS, GLV, higher twist…), yet they employ only very simple/primitive models for the evolution of the underlying deconfined medium… • need to overcome The Great Wall and treat medium and hard probes consistently and at same level of sophistication! Steffen A. Bass

  3. Relativistic Fluid Dynamics C. Nonaka & S.A. Bass: PRC in print, nucl-th/0607018 Steffen A. Bass

  4. Relativistic Fluid Dynamics • transport of macroscopic degrees of freedom • based on conservation laws:μTμν=0 μjμ=0 • for ideal fluid:Tμν= (ε+p) uμ uν - p gμν and jiμ = ρi uμ • Equation of State needed to close system of PDE’s:p=p(T,ρi) • connection to Lattice QCD calculation of EoS • initial conditions (i.e. thermalized QGP) required for calculation • Hydro assumes local thermal equilibrium, vanishing mean free path This particular implementation: • fully 3+1 dimensional, using (τ,x,y,η) coordinates • Lagrangian Hydrodynamics • coordinates move with entropy-density & baryon-number currents • trace adiabatic path of each volume element Steffen A. Bass

  5. 0=0.6 fm/c max=55 GeV/fm3, nBmax=0.15 fm-3 0=0.5 =1.5 EOS (entropy density) =0 3D-Hydro: Parameters Initial Conditions: • Energy Density: • Baryon Number Density: Parameters: • Initial Flow: vL=Bjorken’s solution); vT=0 Equation of State: • Bag Model + excluded volume • 1st order phase transition (to be replaced by Lattice EoS) transverse profile: longitudinal profile: Steffen A. Bass

  6. b=6.3 fm 3D-Hydro: Results separate chemical f.o. simulated by rescaling p,K • 1st attempt to address all data w/ 1 calculation • decent agreement • centrality dependence of v2 problematic Nonaka & Bass, PRC in print (nucl-th/0607018) See also Hirano; Kodama et al. Steffen A. Bass

  7. Hybrid Hydro+Micro Approaches C. Nonaka & S.A. Bass: PRC in print, nucl-th/0607018 Steffen A. Bass

  8. ideally suited for dense systems model early QGP reaction stage well defined Equation of State parameters: initial conditions Equation of State 3D-Hydro + UrQMD Model Full 3-d Hydrodynamics QGP evolution UrQMD Hadronization Cooper-Frye formula hadronic rescattering Monte Carlo TC TSW t fm/c Hydrodynamics+micro. transport (UrQMD) • no equilibrium assumptions • model break-up stage • calculate freeze-out • includes viscosity in hadronic phase • parameters: • (total/partial) cross sections Bass & Dumitru, PRC61,064909(2000) Teaney et al, nucl-th/0110037 Nonaka & Bass, PRC & nucl-th/0607018 Hirano et al. PLB & nucl-th/0511046 matching condition: • use same set of hadronic states for EoS as in UrQMD • generate hadrons in each cell using local T and μB Steffen A. Bass

  9. 3D-Hydro+UrQMD: Results • good description of cross section dependent features & non-equilibrium features of hadronic phase Steffen A. Bass

  10. 3D-Hydro+UrQMD: Reaction Dynamics Hadronic Phase: • significant rescattering ±3 units in y • moderate increase in v2 • rescattering of multi-strange baryons strongly suppressed • rescattering narrows v2 vs. η distribution Steffen A. Bass

  11. 3D-Hydro+UrQMD: Freeze-Out full 3+1 dimensional description of hadronic freeze-out; relevant for HBT Steffen A. Bass

  12. Hard Probes I: Jet-Quenching T. Renk, J. Ruppert, C. Nonaka & S.A. Bass: nucl-th/0611027 A. Majumder & S.A. Bass: in preparation Steffen A. Bass

  13. Jet-Quenching in a Realistic Medium • use BDMPS jet energy loss formalism (Salgado & Wiedemann: PRD68: 014008) • define local transport coefficient along trajectory ξ: • connect to characteristic gluon frenqency: • medium modeled via: • 2+1D Hydro (Eskola et al.) • parameterized evolution (Renk) • 3+1D Hydro (Nonaka & Bass) • ± 50% spread in values for K • systematic error in tomography analysis due to different medium treatment • need more detailed analysis to gain predictive power Steffen A. Bass see talk by T. Renk for details

  14. Azimuthal Dependence of Energy-Loss • pathlength of jet through medium varies as function of azimuthal angle • distinct centrality and reaction plane dependence • stronger constraints on tomographic analysis • collective flow effect on q: • only small modification of shape (ρ: flow rapidity; α: angle of trajectory wrt flow) Steffen A. Bass

  15. Hard Probes II: Heavy-Quarks S.A. Bass, M. Asakawa & B. Mueller: in preparation Steffen A. Bass

  16. Diffusion of Heavy Quarks in a Hydrodynamic Medium • propagation of heavy quarks in a QGP medium resembles a diffusion process • use evolution of 3D-Hydro as medium • T, μ and vflow are known as function of r& τ • describe propagation with a Langevin Eqn: • drag coefficient κ/2T can be locally calculated from 3D hydro evolution Teaney & Moore: PRC 71, 064904 (2005) Van Hees, Greco & Rapp: PRC73, 034913 (’06) Bass, Asakawa & Mueller in preparation Steffen A. Bass

  17. Summary and Outlook • Heavy-Ion collisions at RHIC have produced a state of matter which behaves similar to an ideal fluid • Hydro+Micro transport approaches are the best tool to describe the soft, non-perturbative physics at RHIC after QGP formation • fully (3+1)D implementations are available and work very well • the same hydrodynamic evolution should be utilized as medium for sophisticated jet energy-loss (currently: BDMPS and HT) and heavy quark diffusion calculations • azimuthal dependence of jet energy-loss improves constraints on jet-tomography parameters • consistent treatment of hard and soft physics in one framework next step: • incorporate effects of hard probes on medium Steffen A. Bass

  18. The End Steffen A. Bass

More Related