190 likes | 311 Vues
Explore the growing importance of measuring carbon footprint in logistics, the shift towards eco-friendly practices, and innovative solutions to reduce emissions for a greener future.
E N D
Carbon Footprint Needs in Logistics Diego Klabjan, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Why? • Green image • Innovations to drive economical benefits • Cannot manage if you cannot measure • Proactive to future mandates • Wal-Mart’s eco labels • Large logistics services provider • A year ago a handful of requests for footprint • Now more than a hundred • A different one • Each shipper receives carbon footprint Shippers Want to Know Carbon Footprint
Picture is not so rosy • Many large less-than-truckload (LTL) operators do not provide such service • Too few requests • Do not yet view it as a competitive advantage • Shippers not yet trading cost for eco image • Cost being equal, selection based on eco attributes • Different in EU • Regulations require trade-off • Proctor & Gamble • Switch from truck to rail in Western Europe • Ship on Amazon river instead of trucking south • 40% longer lead time, but 60% lower emissions Not so Fast
SmartWay transport partnership • Commitment to conserve fuel and reduce emissions in transport • SmartWay is free to join and open to companies • Trucking companies • Commit to improve fuel efficiency and reduce emissions • Shipping companies • Commit to ship with SmartWay trucking partners • Improve freight operations EPA SmartWay
Freight Logistics Environmental and Energy Tracking (FLEET) Performance Model • Carriers • Calculate tons of CO2, NOx, and PM • Determine effectiveness of strategies used in the fleet • Aerodynamics, idling reduction • Project the effectiveness of strategies a fleet could add in the future • Estimate cost savings and payback period for strategies • Shippers • Track percentage of freight shipped with SmartWay Transport Carrier Partners • Measure the environmental footprint EPA SmartWay
Challenges • Data • Collection • Transparency • Quality • Processes • Not in place • Find the source, pick up the phone • SmartWay • How will the new tool affect me? Challenges in Carbon Footprint Accounting
Division 2 Parcel Division 1 FAP Parcel FAP CO2 Emissions FAP Division 3 Country X (all divisions) FAP Parcel FAP FAP Shipper Parcel Shipper Complexity FAP = freight audit and payment
Data Collection CO2 Emissions Calculations Uncertainty
“Easy” to derive emissions of the entire system • LTL carrier can account for the total emissions • How to allocate emission contributions to individual users of the system? • Shared resources • Split by weight or volume? Different Angle
Two parcel carriers – direct competitors • Internally developed allocation schemes • No alignment • Need for guidance • What is the carbon footprint of a package from Peoria, IL to Fresno, CA? Allocations
Relay network of an LTL carrier LTL Example
SmartWay • Reporting at a macro level • Total quantity shipped during a year • Receive a score • Works nicely in a static environment • Today’s environment is dynamic • Routes and quantities change often • What is the value of a more micro level reporting? • What is left on the table? Needs Statement
Data • The same old story • Source • Quality • Governance • Allocation schemas • Empty moves (backhauls) • Shared resources • Consolidation • Rail cars • Terminals • Allocation by • Weight • Volume • Bill Summary of Challenges
One third of total emissions in the US coming from transportation Different Perspective
Region • State • Corridor • Industry • Operation Slice it and Dice it
Intermodal investment decision based on • Economics benefits • Emission control • Technological investment • Mode, process • Investment in which region, corridor Infrastructure
Cap emissions • Region, mode, process • Price on freight greenhouse gases • Accounting standards and guidance • UPS and FedEx: Each does it differently Policies and Regulations
Thank you very much! d-klabjan@northwestern.edu SMS: 847-691-1148