1 / 32

Welcome, Panel of Examiner and Process Development Members!

Welcome, Panel of Examiner and Process Development Members!. Washington State Quality Award PEPD #1 Training 2008. First things first!. THANK YOU!

maynard
Télécharger la présentation

Welcome, Panel of Examiner and Process Development Members!

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Welcome, Panel of Examiner and Process Development Members! Washington State Quality Award PEPD #1 Training 2008

  2. First things first! • THANK YOU! • WSQA’s mission: Improving the way we live, learn, and work in Washington by helping organizations improve through the use of the Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence

  3. Objectives For This Class • WSQA Overview • Ethics Review • PEPD Time commitment • PEPD Roles and Responsibilities • Lite and Full Examination Process Review

  4. Introductions • Name, organization, what you do • Questions and expectations? • What do you like to do when you’re not working? • PEPD Members

  5. 1. WSQA organization overview

  6. What is WSQA? • Created by State law to: • Promote excellence • Recognize achievement • Educate and train • Patterned after the Baldrige National Quality Award • Awards presented annually by the Governor • Awarded to private, public, and not-for-profit organizations in manufacturing, service, education, and healthcare

  7. What is WSQA? WSQA is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization supported by • Corporate donations • Individual memberships • Workshop, collaborative and conference fees • Many (many, many!) volunteer hours

  8. Who is WSQA? • Examiners • Lite Assessment • Full Assessment • Certification follows assessment • Senior Examiners • Level 3 Team Leads • Scorebook Editors • Panel of Examiner & Process Development (PEPD) Mentors • Panel of Judges • Board of Directors • Advisory Panel • Executive Director and support team

  9. 2. WSQA Ethics Review • Ethics Statement • Conflict of Interest form and statement

  10. Conflict of interest issues • WSQA seeks to avoid conflict of interest to protect process integrity • Conflicts are frequent! • First step in assignment process: determine any conflicts

  11. Conflict of Interest Exercise • Pick any organization (not yours) • Complete the Conflict of Interest form for that organization

  12. 3. PEPD Time Commitments • Monthly meeting 1 ½ hour • Lite team mentoring Quarterly • E-mails ½ hour • Review examiner inputs stage 1- 1.5 hour • Follow up with team members- .5-1hour • Review consensus comments- 2 hours • Consensus meeting 4-6 hours TOTAL 10 hours for lite process • Team involvement 1-2 hours /month (optional) TOTAL TIME COMMITMENT: 4- 6 hours/month

  13. 4. PEPD Roles & Responsibilities • Process Ethics • Process Integrity- Team follows process • Process Completion • Examiner growth- Mentoring • Process Improvement • Monthly meetings • Examiner training input • Process improvement input

  14. PEPD TEAMS • Examiner Training • Process Review • Governance • Repeat Applicant Process

  15. 5. WSQA Full and Lite Process Comparison Table- website http://www.wsqa.net/criteria.php Time Table – website

  16. Stages of the Assessment Process

  17. Preparing for independent review • Read the criteria • Read the application • Familiarize yourself with the online tool • Site: http://www.shawresources.com/ • Login information in email from WSQA • Training at https://cc.readytalk.com/play?id=o6d1b4j9 (part 1) and https://cc.readytalk.com/play?id=gc87umbs (part 2) • Check in with Team Lead on Key Factors and after entering category 1 and associated results

  18. Independent review • Select the most relevant Key Factors (from list) • Read the criteria for the category • Read (and annotate) the relevant section of the application • Identify and record the applicant’s processes • Record observations. Note missing responses and significant observations • Recommend a scoring range for the category

  19. Independent review steps - process • Review related criteria • Read the category under review, take notes • Select relevant key factors from list • Identify & record processes • Record observations on ADLI: • Approach • Deployment • Learning • Integration • Identify any significant or missing responses

  20. Record observations on “ADLI” “Learning” refers to • Refining the approach through cycles of evaluation and improvement • Encouraging breakthrough change to your approach (innovation) • Sharing refinements and innovations with other relevant work units and processes

  21. Record observations on “ADLI” “Integration” refers to the harmonization of • Plans • Processes • Information • Resource decisions • Actions • Results • Analyses to support key, organization-wide goals

  22. Record observations on “ADLI” Questions to ask in analyzing “Integration” • Do the individual components of a performance management system operate as a fully interconnected unit? • Is the approach aligned with the organizational needs identified in the Organizational Profile?

  23. Process diagnosis: key concepts Integration examples: • Alignment of objectives and action plans with strategic challenges AND mission, vision, values • Alignment of product/service delivery methods with KEY customer requirements • Alignment of key process measures with KEY customer requirements

  24. Results evaluation: key concepts Letci

  25. WSQA Consensus: Step-by-step

  26. WSQA Consensus: Step-by-step

  27. WSQA Consensus: Step-by-step

  28. Consensus preparation and call(s) • Each Examiner responds with agreement, suggestions for changes, or disagreement, stating rationales • Category Lead facilitates consensus • Team Lead and/or PEPD mentor leads final scoring discussion • Can take anywhere from 4-8 hours (depending on what?)

  29. Comment, scoring considerations • “Benefit of the doubt” • Give credit for what’s in the application • Don’t penalize for incidental exceptions • Not every process must show complete “DLI” • Not every results example must include “TCI”

  30. Comment, scoring considerations • For LITE, only one score for entire results Category 7 • Propose a score for results related to your categories • Be prepared to reach team consensus for all of Category 7 • Using scoring language can help the applicant understand comments and score

  31. 6. Examiner Software Down load manual and webinar from our website: http://www.wsqa.net/Extimetable.php Log on to Examiner software at: https://www.shawresources.com/pea2007

  32. THANK YOU!! Your support and participation as Examiners helps us all by helping WSQA fulfill its mission!

More Related