1 / 24

Magnification

Magnification. Amy Nau , O.D. http://www.purdue.edu/hr/images/magnifyingGlass.jpg. Angular Apparent (Conventional/ Effective/Loupe) Axial/longitudinal Combined/total Cortical Relative distance. Electronic/transverse Iso-accommodative Lateral/linear Spectacle Relative spectacle

mcclusky
Télécharger la présentation

Magnification

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Magnification Amy Nau, O.D. http://www.purdue.edu/hr/images/magnifyingGlass.jpg

  2. Angular • Apparent (Conventional/ Effective/Loupe) • Axial/longitudinal • Combined/total • Cortical • Relative distance • Electronic/transverse • Iso-accommodative • Lateral/linear • Spectacle • Relative spectacle • Relative size • Shape • Power Types of Magnification

  3. Ratio of object angle to image angle • This is why objects appear larger as they move closer to the eye Angular Magnification

  4. The object is not changed in position or size, but has a lens between the object and the eye which makes it appear larger (magnifying glass, hand magnifier, telescopes) M = tan α′/tan α M=angle image device /angle original object Angular Magnification http://www.medrounds.org/optics-review/uploaded_images/Figure34-745600.jpg

  5. Mag 0-1 means image is smaller than object • Mag >1 means image is larger than object • Mag=1 same size (no mag) • If the image is farther from the lens than the object it will be larger (magnified) and vice versa • Image is erect if on same side of lens as object (like a mirror)- virtual image • + upright/ - inverted Angular Magnificationbasic concepts

  6. Ratio of image vergence to object vergence L’/L Ratio of image size to object size= I/O http://www.medrounds.org/optics-review/2006/05/27.html Linear/Transverse Magnification

  7. Calculate transverse mag for the following • F=+8 • Object distance 100 cm image distance is 1/8=0.14m So, 0.14/1=0.14 (minimized) Problem image size/object size or image dist/obj dist

  8. M= M1X M2 • Axial magnification is used when talking about 3D objects • Axial magnification is the distance between the two image planes divided by the distance between the two object planes (extreme anterior and posterior points on the object with their conjugate image points) Axial (Longitudinal) Magnification

  9. Take incoming vergence front and back of object and calculate the emergent vergence front and back then get the ratio. Axial (Longitudinal) Magnification

  10. Syn: Conventional/Effective/Loupe/Relative • M e = dF • Where d = distance in meters to the object (image is formed at infinity) • Question: A +24.00D lens is used as a hand held magnifier with the patient viewing an object that is 50cm from the eye and at the focal point of the lens. How much larger do things appear to the patient? • Answer: d = 0.50m, F= +24.00D, M e = dF = 0.50(24) = 12X • This indicates that closer working distances result in less effective magnification. Apparent Magnification

  11. Conventional Magnification = Mc = dF + 1 • The underlying assumption in this equation is that the patient is “supplying” one unit (1X) of magnification otherwise it is the same as apparent magnification • Used for low vision Conventional Magnification

  12. Generally used for microscopes, but basically you multiply the individual lens mags together • MT= M1 X M2 X M3….. • So you have a 15 x eyepiece and a 10x objective for total mag of 150x. Total (Combined) Magnification

  13. CCTV, computers, video, Brainport • It is equal to the ratio of the size of the image on the screen to the size of the original object being viewed. • Example: an object 2cm in height measures 6 cm on the screen, the magnification is 6/2 = 3✕. Electronic Magnification

  14. The magnification that results from decreasing the distance between an object and the eye. It is expressed as • Md = x/x′ • where x and x′ are the initial distance and the new distance, respectively. • Example: if the viewing distance is decreased from 60 cm to 20 cm, Md = 60/20 = 3✕. relative distance magnification

  15. The magnification of a lens (or lens system) when the distance of the image from the eye (or spectacle plane) formed by a magnifier is equal to the distance of the object from the eye viewed without the magnifier. Thus the same amount of accommodation (or near addition) is required with or without the magnifier. It is equal to • M = 1 + (F/D) • where F is the power of the magnifier (assumed to be so close to the eye as to ignore the distance separating them) and D the object vergence. Iso- Accommodative Magnification

  16. How much glasses magnify or minify the retinal image size • It is >1 in the hyperopic eye, <1 in myopia. • With a contact lens, this magnification is 1 whatever the refractive error. • Depends on • Lens thickness • Material (index) • Vertex distance • Base curve of the front of the lens Spectacle Magnfication

  17. SM=(shape factor) x (power factor) • Shape factor relates to base curve and lens thickness • Power factor relates to overall lens power and vertex distance • SM = (1/1-(t/n)D1) x (1/1-hD) • Where: n=index of refraction; D1=front surface power (base curve); D = total lens power; h= vertex dist +3mm (b/c calculated at entrance pupil not corneal plane) Spectacle Magnification

  18. In the case of aniseikonia, eikonic lenses can be prescribed which try to reduce magnification effects by manipulating • BC • Thickness • Vertex distance • Can be cosmetically unacceptable Spectacle Magnification

  19. What is the SM for each lens, the difference in mag percent and how can you minimize the difference? OD: +1.50; BC +6.25; t=3mm OS: +4.50; BC +9.25; t=5mm Vertex 12mm N=1.498 SM OD = (1/1-(0.003/1.498)(6.25)) (1/1-(0.015)(1.50)=1.036 %SM= (SM-1)(100)= 3.6% SM OS: (1/1-(0.005/1.498)(9.25)) (1/1-0.015)(4.50)=1.107 % SM = 10.7% Difference in SM is thus 7.1% You can try to manipulate BC, t, vertex, index. Need to check each one to see which may work

  20. Rare to change all 3 variables • Choose small, round frame fitting close to face • Aspheric lenses • Acceptability of poor cosmesis usually related to functional outcome. Spectacle Magnification

  21. The ratio of the retinal image size in the corrected ametropic eye to that in a standard emmetropic eye. Relative Spectacle Magnification

  22. The magnification which results from increasing the actual size of an object viewed. Examples: a larger TV screen; a larger print book than one used previously. It is expressed as • Ms = h2/h1 • where h2 and h1 are the sizes of the enlarged object and the initial object, respectively. • Syn. size magnification; relative size enlargement. Relative Size Magnfication

  23. Magnification of a lens or of an optical system, expressed as the ratio of the size of the image h′ to the size of the object h. It is usually denoted by • M = h′/h = l′/l = L/L′ • where l′ and l are the distances of the image and object, respectively from the principal plane of the lens (or lens system) and L and L′ the object and image vergences Lateral Magnification

  24. Term referring to the fact that the amount of cortical area devoted to processing visual information from the central area of the retina far exceeds the amount devoted to the peripheral retina. It is estimated that about 25% of the cells in the visual cortex are devoted to processing the central 2.5º of the visual field. http://webvision.med.utah.edu/imageswv/fovea-periphery.jpg Cortical Magnification

More Related