1 / 14

Shoreline Master Program Update: Review of DOE Comments and Development Standards

On July 24, 2012, the Planning Commission convened to discuss updates on the Shoreline Master Program. Key topics included a review of DOE comments, particularly on Chapter 4 concerning shoreline use provisions, critical areas in Chapter 3, and definitions in Chapter 7. Staff addressed a moderate level of feedback and outlined plans for further discussion in September. The meeting highlighted development standards such as height restrictions, setbacks, and impervious surface limits, emphasizing the preservation of visual access to water and the importance of proper management of shoreline activities.

mead
Télécharger la présentation

Shoreline Master Program Update: Review of DOE Comments and Development Standards

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Planning Commission meeting 7/24/2012 Shoreline Master program update

  2. Update on DOE Comments • Review Chapter 4 - Shoreline Use Provisions • Questions purpose

  3. DOE Comments received June 8 • Chapter 3: Critical areas (wetlands, habitat areas) • Chapter 7: Definitions • Overall – moderate amount of comments • Staff working to address • More detailed discussion in Septemberon DOE changes Update on doe comments

  4. Chapter 4: shoreline use table

  5. Chapter 4: shoreline use table

  6. Chapter 4: development stds table

  7. Maximum height • Meant to preserve visual access (views) to water. • Generally 35 feet. 55 feet in UMU and Maritime. • View corridor study needed over 35 feet. • Setbacks • 50 feet from OHWM, except 75 in UPF & 100 Conservancy • Bluff – as recommended by geotechnical engineer, no less than 25 feet. • Averaging – yes! Chapter 4: development stds

  8. Chapter 4: building height

  9. Chapter 4: setback averaging sfr

  10. Chapter 4: setback averaging mfr

  11. Chapter 4: impervious standards

  12. Use Provisions: • Boating facilities & marinas • Piers, marinas, public boat launches • Location, materials, size, number. • For example, 24% open area for overwater structures. No creosote wood. • Commercial • No new overwater commercial uses, except accessory • Non-water oriented prohibited, except no direct connection to shoreline Chapter 4: shoreline use provisions

  13. Chapter 4: shoreline use provisions • Use Provisions: • Industrial • Water-dependent in Maritime only (ports, boat building, etc.) • Non-water dependent prohibited • Residential • Residential uses are priority under SMA • Proper management of these uses • Avoid stabilization, no overwater residences, conserve vegetation, limit impervious surfaces, discourage septic systems

  14. Questions?

More Related