1 / 33

RTI Goes to Pre-K

RTI Goes to Pre-K. An Early Intervening System Called Recognition and Response . Virginia Buysse Ellen Peisner -Feinberg. In collaboration with: National Center for Learning Disabilities (NCLD) National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)

medwin
Télécharger la présentation

RTI Goes to Pre-K

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RTI Goes to Pre-K An Early Intervening System Called Recognition and Response Virginia Buysse Ellen Peisner-Feinberg

  2. In collaboration with: National Center for Learning Disabilities (NCLD) National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) Communications Consortium Media Center (CCMC) With funding from: Emily Hall Tremaine Foundation

  3. Objectives • Describe a conceptual framework for Recognition and Response (R&R) • Consider the origins of R&R in RTI and existing tiered approaches in early childhood • Identify key considerations for implementing & evaluating R&R in early childhood

  4. Defining Features of RTI • A core curriculum & effective instruction for all children • Targeted interventions for some students who meet screening criteria • Integrated system for universal screening and progress monitoring linked to instructional planning

  5. Broad Support for RTI • Widespread local implementation in public schools • Additional authority under IDEA • National leadership • Evidence of the efficacy of targeted interventions within an RTI framework for school-age children (Coleman, Buysse, & Neitzel, 2006) • RTI offers a promising approach for improving program quality & instruction in pre-k

  6. Growing Support for RTI in Early Childhood • Special issue on early childhood tiered models in School Psychology Review (2006), Vol. 35, No. 4 • Topics in Early Childhood Special Education (Winter, 2007), Vol. 27, No. 4 • DEC brief position statement on RTI in early childhood (2007; DEC Communicator Vol. 1[3]) • Capitol Hill Briefing & RTI national summit presentations • New National Center to be established in 2008 on RTI in early childhood funded by US DOE (IES)

  7. Existing Tiered Models in Early Childhood • Building Blocks (Sandall & Schwartz, 2002) • Positive Behavioral Supports (PBS; Barnett et al., 2006) • Intervention Hierarchy (Brown, Odom, & Conroy, 2001) • Teaching Pyramid (Hemmeter, Ostrosky, & Fox, 2006)

  8. Conceptual Framework for R&R System

  9. Recognition: Screening & Progress Monitoring

  10. Universal Screening & Progress Monitoring • Universal screening within first 2 months (NAEYC, 2005) and on a set schedule after that (fall, winter, spring) • Tier 1: Do most children (~70-80%) meet screening criteria? • Tier 2: Some children (~15-25%) may need targeted interventions, along with progress monitoring

  11. Universal Screening & Progress Monitoring • Tier 3: A few children (~5%) will need more individualized interventions & get more frequent progress monitoring • Children with identified disabilities are not required to go through RTI process; RTI should not delay referral of children with suspected disabilities (CEC, 2007)

  12. Screening & Progress Monitoring Tools • Purpose is for instructional planning, not for diagnostic evaluation • Designed to be used repeatedly • Quick, easy to administer • Correlated with long-term educational goals; not tied to a particular curriculum • Information on both level & rate of growth

  13. Examples of Screening & Progress Monitoring Measures in Early Childhood • Individual Growth & Development Indicators (IGDIs) • Letter naming, picture naming, alliteration, rhyming • Get It! Got It! Go! (http://ggg.umn.edu/)

  14. Examples of Screening & Progress Monitoring Measures in Early Childhood • Math CBM (VanDerHeyden et al., 2007) • Counting objects, number selection, number naming, counting, & visual discrimination • Note: To be published in 2008

  15. Response: Research-Based Curricula, Intentional Teaching, & Interventions

  16. What are the responses within each tier? • Tier 1: Core curriculum and intentional teaching for all children • Core curriculum is research-based & comprehensive across all domains • May also include content-specific curricula (e.g., early literacy or math) • Intentional teaching of key content areas, including planning and evaluating instruction

  17. What are the responses within each tier? • Tier 2: Explicit small group interventions augmented with embedded interventions • Explicit: structured, teacher-directed, content-specific interventions • Embedded: occur within daily activities, build on children’s strengths & interests, complement explicit interventions

  18. What are the responses within each tier? • Tier 3: Intensive & individualized interventions • Research-based methods for scaffolding-- prompting, modeling, giving a directive & waiting for a response • Within the context of explicit approaches under Tier 2 • Continue use of embedded interventions

  19. Effectiveness Ratings for Early Childhood Interventions

  20. An Example of a Tier 2 Intervention • Read It Again! (Justice, McGinty, Beckman, & Kilday, 2006) • Language & literacy supplement for pre-k programs: • Guidelines for implementing lessons (before, during, & after reading) • Repeated use of storybooks, picture cards, & other literacy materials • Repetition of key concepts • Appropriate for small groups

  21. An Example of a Tier 2 Intervention • Four domains of learning: vocabulary, narrative, phonological awareness, & print/alphabet knowledge • Consists of 60 lessons, each addressing multiple domains (20 min/lesson) • Preliminary research evidence of efficacy in pre-k (Justice et al., 2007)

  22. Collaborative Problem-Solving Process

  23. Steps in Problem-Solving • May involve teachers, parents, & specialists • Establish desired outcomes • Interpret assessment results • Implement interventions • Evaluate & adjust

  24. Next Steps: A Pilot Study of R&R • Piloting R&R in two states in 20-40 pre-k classes • Intervention package: • Implementation based on the R&R manual • An existing assessment system and language & literacy intervention • Problem-solving component

  25. Next Steps: A Pilot Study of R&R • Professional development to ensure acquisition of knowledge & skills • Linked to manualized R&R framework and curriculum & assessment materials • Full-day institutes • Individualized consultation support • Community of practice meetings

  26. Next Steps: A Pilot Study of R&R • Research questions: • Can teachers implement the R&R system with fidelity? • Do teachers find the R&R system acceptable and useful? • Is there evidence that R&R is beneficial in promoting the development of children with learning difficulties?

  27. Future Considerations • How should R&R be adapted for diverse learners (e.g., ELLs, children with disabilities)? • How can R&R be implemented across multiple domains of development & learning? • Need more evidence-based pre-k interventions linked to assessments for use in R&R • What infrastructure could best support R&R?

  28. www.recognitionandresponse.org

More Related