SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Designing Effective Citizen-Friendly Reporting: GASB's Criteria and Core Evaluation Issues

mei avatar
5 diapositives · 173 Views · Sep 09, 2014

Discussing GASB's suggested criteria for effective communication reports, including citizen involvement, key measures, and reliable information. Core evaluation questions explored to enhance citizen engagement.

Designing Effective Citizen-Friendly Reporting: GASB's Criteria and Core Evaluation Issues - slide 1
01 / 5Designing Effective Citizen-Friendly Reporting: GASB's Criteria and Core Evaluation Issues
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Designing Effective Citizen-Friendly Reporting: GASB's Criteria and Core Evaluation Issues
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Designing the Evaluation: A Discussion with the Advisory Committee on Citizen-Friendly ReportingApril 13, 2005Human Services Research InstituteMadeleine KimmichMichael Nikolenko

  2. GASB’s Suggested Criteria for Effective Communication Reports should include: Purpose and scope Goals and objectives Citizen involvement Multiple levels of reporting Analysis of results and challenges Focus on key measures Reliable information Relevant measures Resources used and efficiency

  3. GASB’s Suggested Criteria for Effective Communication, cont. Reports should include: • Citizen and customer perceptions • Comparisons • Factors affecting results • Aggregation and disaggregation • Consistency from period to period • User friendliness • Regular and timely reporting

  4. Core Evaluation Issues • Who is the common audience? How we will test each project: Use the Citizen Advisory Committee, or use agency advisory boards? • What is the purpose? To provide information that certain groups want? To improve public image? To generate interest in performance? • What is the objective? Access vs. use of information

  5. Our Core Evaluation Question: How well each project’s presentation of performance measure information is likely to engage and help interested citizens? 1. Is the interface user-friendly? (Understandability) 2. Is the information they choose to present easy to understand and meaningful? (Comparability/Timeliness/Consistency/Reliability) 3. How can users find out the information is available? (Accessibility)