1 / 31

Zbigniew Chaj ę cki, Mike Lisa Ohio State University

Z. Ch. & M. Lisa, PRC 78 064903 (2008) Z. Ch. & M. Lisa, PRC 79 034908 (2009) Z. Ch., arXiv:0901.4078 [nucl-ex] Z. Ch. & M. Lisa, to be published. Do p+p Collisions Flow at RHIC? Understanding One- and Two-particle Distributions, Multiplicity Evolution, and Conservation Laws.

melinda-dillon
Télécharger la présentation

Zbigniew Chaj ę cki, Mike Lisa Ohio State University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Z. Ch. & M. Lisa, PRC 78 064903 (2008) Z. Ch. & M. Lisa, PRC 79 034908 (2009) Z. Ch., arXiv:0901.4078 [nucl-ex] Z. Ch. & M. Lisa, to be published Do p+p Collisions Flow at RHIC?Understanding One- and Two-particle Distributions, Multiplicity Evolution, and Conservation Laws Zbigniew Chajęcki, Mike Lisa Ohio State University Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  2. Outline & Motivation • p+p as a reference to heavy ion collisions • Effect of the phase-space constraints due to energy and momentum conservation • Re-examining multiplicity-evolution of pT spectra, considering evolution of available phase space • postulate of unchanging parent distribution • Consistent treatment of the phase-space constraints and bulk in femtoscopy and spectra [hard sector] [soft sector] • Heavy ion collisions as a reference to p+p? • Summary Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  3. Small vs Big STAR, PRL93 (2004) 252301 STAR PRL 92 112301 (2004) Au+Au p+p Small system (p+p) Large system (Au+Au) Hard sector : p+p apparently different than Au+Au Soft sector : Is p+p a clear reference to Au+Au? Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  4. Phase-Space varies with multiplicity Phase-space factor: Hagedorn/Fermi Phase-space constraints Extreme case, N=3, easily calculable with Dalitz plot What about the effect for higher number of particles? Dalitz plot for a three-body final state. (p at 3 GeV), PDG 2008 Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  5. Correlations arising (only) from conservation laws (PS constraints) single-particle “parent” distribution w/o P.S. restriction what we measure no other correlations with P.S. restriction k-particle distribution (k<N) CLT approximation works best for N>10 & Ei< 23<E> Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  6. Phase-space effect on k-particle distribution k-particle distribution in N-particle system (in CMS frame) “distortion” due to PS constraints • Danielewicz et al, PRC38 120 (1988) • Borghini, Dinh, & Ollitraut PRC62 034902 (2000) • Borghini, Eur. Phys. J. C30:381-385, (2003) • Chajecki & Lisa, PRC 78 064903 (2008), PRC 79 034908 (2009) Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  7. Phase-space effect on kinematic observables 1-particle PS effect 2-particle PS effect N=40 3-particle PS effect Borghini et al, PRC 66 014901 (2002) - also, Danielewicz, PLBB157:146 (1985) NA49 pions N. Borghini, PRC75:021904 (2007) Finite-particle constrains Z.Ch, M.Lisa, PRC 79 034908 (2009) N=5 CF (GenBod) EMCICs Z. Ch, M. Lisa, PRC 78 064903 (2008) Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  8. 1-particle phase-space effect STAR PRL 92 112301 (2004) Then we would measure: measured Au+Au 0-5% Au+Au 60-70% “distortion” of single-particle spectra “matrix element” What ifthe only difference between p+p and A+A collisions was N? p+p minbias STAR PRL 92 112301 (2004) Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  9. Multiplicity evolution of spectra - p+p to A+A (soft sector) STAR PRL 92 112301 (2004) N evolution of spectra dominated by PS “distortion” p+p system samples same parent distribution, but under stronger PS constraints Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  10. Kinematic scales of “the system” Fit results for p+p consistent with expectations from Maxwell-Boltzman equation, Blast-wave, Pythia, … • postulate of same parent consistent with all spectra • magnitude • pT dependence (shape) • mass dependence Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  11. By popular demand Blast-Wave Model: F. Retiere, M. Lisa, PRC70:044907,2004. STAR PRL 92 112301 (2004) Almost universal “flow” & “temperature” parameters in a BlastWave fit Apparent changes in β, T with dN/dη caused by finite phase-space effect p+p Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  12. Blast-wave in p+p@200GeV: simultaneous description of spectra, HBT determined entirely by spectra STAR Preliminary See M. Lisa’s poster (STAR) Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  13. Fits to pion CF in p+p by STAR Use parameters obtained from the fit to STAR femtoscopic correlation function and use them to “correct” spectra kT = [0.35,0.45] GeV/c STAR preliminary STAR Preliminary See M. Lisa’s poster (STAR) exp CF HBT HBT+ “conservation” Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  14. Combined fit: consistent flow-based description STAR Preliminary See M. Lisa’s poster (STAR) Blast-Wave Model: F. Retiere, M. Lisa, PRC70:044907,2004. Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  15. Combined fit: consistent flow-based description “raw” (ignoring PS effets) p+p collisions show same flow signals as A+A collisions PS effects fixed by correlations Joint spectra/HBT BW fit PS effects free adjusted to spectra & fit to spectra PS effects fixed by correlations Joint spectra/HBT BW fit “raw” (ignoring PS effects) Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  16. Summary STAR Preliminary exp CF HBT HBT+ “conservation” STAR PRL 92 112301 (2004) ? • Energy and momentum conservation induces phase-space constraint that has explicit multiplicity dependence • should not be ignored in (crucial!) N-dependent comparisons • significant effect on 2- (and 3-) particle correlations [c.f. Ollitrault, Borghini, Voloshin…] • …and single-particle spectra (often neglected because no “red flags”) • Femtoscopy & Spectra • in H.I.C., well understood, detailed fingerprint of flow • RHIC – first opportunity for direct comparison with p+p • accounting for finite phase-space effects  identical flow signals in p+p • Has A+A become the reference system for p+p in non-perturbative sector??? Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  17. “the system”… a nontrivial concept Characteristic scales of relevant system in which limited energy-momentum is shared • Not known a priori • should track measured quantities, but not be identical to them • N includes all primary particles (including unmeasured γ’s etc) • secondary decay (resonances, fragmentation) smears connection b/t <E2> and measured one • <E2> etc: averages of the parent distribution • “relevant system” almost certainly not the “whole” (4π) system • e.g. beam fragmentation probably not relevant to system emitting at midrapidity • characteristic physical processes (strings etc): Δy ~ 1÷2 • jets: “of the system” ?? • or just stealing energy from “the system?” • if “relevant system” ≠ “whole system”, then total energy-momentum will fluctuatee-by-e Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  18. Consistency check …. Characteristic scales of relevant system in which limited energy-momentum is shared Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  19. Heavy Ion Collisions : Explosive flow revealed through specific fingerprints on soft-sector observables Spectra v2 HBT calculable in hydrodynamics or toy “blast wave” models slow  fast  Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  20. Femtoscopy - direct evidence of flow Spectra v2 R (fm) space-momentum substructure mapped in detail STAR PRL 91 262301 (2003) HBT mT (GeV/c)  K Flow-dominated “Blast-wave” toy models capture main characteristics e.g. PRC70 044907 (2004) Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  21. Implication: A+A is just a collection of flowing p+p? No! Quite the opposite. femtoscopically A+A looks like a big BlastWave not superposition of small BlastWaves A+A has thermalized globally spectra superposition of spectra from p+p has same shape as a spectrum from p+p! relaxation of P.S. constraints indicates A+A has thermalized globally rather, p+p looks like a “little A+A” Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  22. EMCIC fit to STAR p+p data kT = [0.15,0.25] GeV/c kT = [0.25,0.35] GeV/c kT = [0.35,0.45] GeV/c kT = [0.45,0.60] GeV/c STAR preliminary Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  23. Average matrix element - factorization Probability for an n-particle final state: dynamics kinematics Single-particle spectrum R. Hagedorn, Relativistic Kinematics 1963 Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  24. … STAR PRC 2007 Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  25. World Systematics : R(pT/mT) in small systems STAR preliminary STAR preliminary from STAR talk at WWND 2009 non-STAR data taken from Z. Ch. arXiv:0901.4078 [nucl-ex] ** Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  26. Non-femto correlations Multiplicity increases Qx<0.2 GeV/c E766, PRD 49 (1994) 4373 OPAL, Eur. Phys. J. C52 (2007) 787-803 Qx<0.04 GeV/c NA23, Z. Phys. C43 (1989) 341 CLEO PRD32 (1985) 2294 NA22, Z. Phys. C71 (1996) 405 Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  27. Significant non-femto correlations, but little effect on “message” rather, “suggestion”: explosive flow in p+p? Ratio of (AuAu, CuCu, dAu) HBT radii by pp STAR preliminary Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  28. STAR ϕ spectra PLB 612 (2005) 181 99 (2007) 112301 folks use this one for p+p data … and this one for Au+Au data (looks better than the one to the left!) looks to me like the spectrum evolves… jetty starting ~ mT-m=1.5  pT=2.3 arXiv:0809.4737 these ones are recently submitted papers that replot the data from the above arXiv:0810.4979 submitted Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  29. phi agrees as well/poorly as pi/K/p from our paper Z. Chajecki & M. Lisa PRC 79 034908 (2009) as discussed in our paper, EMCICs alone is not enough to explain behavior beyond ~ 1GeV/c using same parameters as in our paper, multiplicity-dependence of phi is described, as well, and up to same pT, as pi/k/p Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  30. Phase-space effects in PYTHIA  correlation function from PYTHIA It’s likely that there are also other correlations in PYTHIA than just due to E&M correlations Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

  31. b Z. Ch. - QM 2009, Knoxville, Tennessee, Mar 31, 2009

More Related