40 likes | 171 Vues
Release management for software projects involves complex coordination of diverse skills across multiple stakeholders. With the increasing overlaps and dependencies in phases, teams, and organizations, the risk of mistakes rises, especially during unplanned actions. Implementing a “team management” approach that emphasizes shared responsibility and authority is essential. Regular meetings with all relevant stakeholders, including analysts, designers, testers, and marketing, can facilitate collaboration and consensus on key decisions, ensuring efficient resource utilization and smoother project execution.
E N D
Release Management using “team management” • Software projects are often large and complex • requiring multiple skills • requiring more time • requiring more team work • Monitoring and Making Adjustments are becoming more complex and confusing because of the amount of overlaps/dependencies of phases, people, organizations, departments, competition, etc. • Higher Risk of Making Mistakes under fire, especially for unplanned actions • Utilize “team” management concept • “shared” responsibility • “shared” authority • “leverage”diverse resources
Release Management • Team management using: a) “formal” management reviewing of project status and b) joint decisions and consensus on actions: • Includes all the stakeholders: • Application analysts (requirements analysts) • Designers • Constructors (detailed design, code, information material) • Testers • QA (process, quality data) • Library & Configuration management • Tools and components providers • [Customer support] • [Marketing/Sales/Training] • [major customers] • [finance] • [personnel]
Release Management Stake- holder Stake- holder Stake- holder • Conducted regularly (daily, weekly, or bi-monthly) • Must make decisions and take actions • Must have authority to move resources,schedules,functionality,and escalate issues Stake- holder Stake- holder Stake- holder Stake- holder Stake- holder Stake- holder
Release Management • Meant for physically co-located, but may be remote (with proper team tools) • Must be “inclusive” and discourage pockets of “islands” • The actual meetings should follow an agenda • Must make “difficult” decisions such: • Delaying schedule => implications ? • Increasing resources => implications? • Decreasing resources => implications • Decreasing functionality => implications • Increasing functionality => implications? Must decide on : Ready to Release the Product ?--- Are we done with the project?