1 / 34

CSE 242A Integrated Circuit Layout Automation

CSE 242A Integrated Circuit Layout Automation. Lecture: Floorplanning Winter 2009 Chung-Kuan Cheng. Outlines. Introduction Representations and Approaches Constraint Graph Triangulation Tutte’s Duality Slicing Flooplanning Nonslicing ... Block Handling Research Directions.

mickeyr
Télécharger la présentation

CSE 242A Integrated Circuit Layout Automation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CSE 242A Integrated Circuit Layout Automation Lecture: Floorplanning Winter 2009 Chung-Kuan Cheng

  2. Outlines • Introduction • Representations and Approaches • Constraint Graph • Triangulation • Tutte’s Duality • Slicing Flooplanning • Nonslicing ... • Block Handling • Research Directions

  3. Introduction • Input A set of blocks with constraints on area, shapes, relative positions, Constraints on chip area and aspect ratio, Netlist. • Output Shapes, Locations, Pin positions of the blocks • Objective Functions Performance, chip area, and wire length

  4. Representations • Constraint Graph Theorem: A V or H constraint graph is planar and acyclic.

  5. Constraint Graph Generation # Edges O(n2), O(n)

  6. Constraint Graph Generation Scan from left to right at cur_x; Update scaline: list of blocks crossing scanline. For blocks T strating at cur_x; Insert T into scanline list …R->T->S … Generate edges R->T and T->S End

  7. Constraint Graph Generation 2 Scan from left to right at cur_x; Update scanline: list of blocks crossing scanline. For blocks T starting at cur_x; Insert T into scanline list: …R->T->S … Generate list:T.top=R, R.bot=T, T.bot=S, S.top=T End For block T ending at cur_x; if T.top is list in scanline, generate edge T.top->T; if T.bot is list in scanline, generate edge T->T.bot End End

  8. Floorplan Triangulation • Floorplan with zero dead space • Floorplan with dead space

  9. Triangulation • For floorplan with zero dead space, H & V constraint graphs are dual. H & V • Every face is a triangle • All internal nodes have a degree >= 4 • All cycles that are not faces have length >= 4

  10. Triangulation 2 Node oriented vs edge oriented constraint graph 8 1 b 2 a c e 3 d 4 f g 5 10 6 7

  11. Tutte’s Duality s s c a c a d b b d t t

  12. Slicing Floorplan & General Flow V H H V H 1 2 5 4 3 6 Nonslicing

  13. Routing Region Definition & Ordering Straight Channel L Shaped b b 1 a a 1 2 3 c 2 c Feasible Order Non-Feasible Order

  14. Polish Expression v 3 H 1 6 V 4 H V H 7 2 5 4 3 6 1 5 7 2 2 1 H 5 7 V 4 3 H 6 V H V

  15. Given n components, there are n-1 operators • Polish Exp has 2n-1 length • Polish Exp is legal iff • # operators <= # comps – 1 • For any prefix substring 2 1 H5 7 V 4 3 H 6 V H V 2 1 5 H 7 V 4 3 H 6 V H V 2 1 5 H V H V 7 4 3 6 H V

  16. Redundancy of Polish Exp 3 1 2 V V V V 1 2 3 2 3 1 1 2 3 V V 1 2 V 3 V No consecutive operators of the same type

  17. Neighborhood Structure • OP. Chain: VHVHV… or HVHV… • 2 3 V 1 4 H 5 V 6 H V V • M1: Swap adjacent components • M2: Complement a chain • M3: Move an operator under the prefix constraint of “# operators <= # comps – 1”

  18. 5 3 1 2 V 3 H4 V 5 H 4 1 2 5 5 4 4 3 1 2 V 4 H 3 V 5 H 1 2 V 4 3 5 H V H 3 1 2 1 2 3 5 5 4 3 4 1 2 H 4 3 5 H V H 1 2 V 4 H 3 5 V H 2 1 2 1 3 2 5 3 5 4 1 2 V 4 3 H 5 V H 1 2 H 4 3 5 V H V 1 1 2 4

  19. The choices of macro cell H 3 4 V 2 H 1 1 2 3 4 Hi Hj

  20. Hierarchy Floorplan K=2 K=3 K=4

  21. a b d c e a3 a1 b1 b2 a4 a2 a6 b4 b5 a5 b3 a11 a12 a14 a13

  22. Sequence Pair b a b a b b a a Eg. c a e b d a b c d e c e #combinations a b d

  23. Grid System Interpretation 5 e 4 d a r 3 c x 2 b 1 a l b 1 2 3 4 5

  24. Bounded-Sliceline Grid • Perturbation: move a component to another room

  25. BSG Adjacency Graphs • Theorem: nxn grid contains the complete solution space for n components

  26. Twin Binary Trees Definition of Twin Binary Trees Transformations between Floorplan and Twin Binary Trees

  27. B 00 2700 A B A A B A 900 1800 B Twin Binary Trees T T T T 2700 1800 900 00 C+-neighbor: 00 T-junction, block on right 2700 T-junction, block on top C--neighbor: 900 T-junction, block on top 1800 T-junction, block on left

  28. F C E A E B B C A 0 X D X 1 X D A D E 1 F B F 0 1 X C 0 1 0 0 1 Twin Binary Trees (1)=11001 (2)=00110 order(t1)=order(t2)=ABCDFE

  29. Twin Binary Trees and Mosaic Floorplan Twin Binary Tree  Mosaic Floorplan : one to one mapping Transformation between twin binary trees and mosaic floorplan takes linear complexity #twin binary trees = Baxter number

  30. Corner Block List • Corner Block List  Mosaic Floorplan • A permutation and two 0-1 lists e.g. S=(fcegbad), L=(001100), T=(001010010)

  31. Corner Block List • S=(fcegbad), L=(001100), T=(001010010) • S is the reversed sequence of removed blocks • L[i] is the removing direction of block i • Number of ‘0’s before ith ‘1’ in T is the number of blocks covered by S[i] when it is removed

  32. Corner Block List • Redundancy (L and T are not independent) • Solution space size O(n!23n-3/n1.5) • Can be reduced to O(n!23n-3/n4), no redundancy

  33. Floorplan Optimization Flow • Simulated annealing (SA) in the representation solution space s := s0; e := E(s) // Initial state, energy. sb := s; eb := e // Initial "best" solution k := 0 // Energy evaluation count. while k < kmax and e > emax // While time remains & not good enough: sn := neighbour(s) // Pick some neighbour. en := E(sn) // Compute its energy. if en < eb then // Is this a new best? sb := sn; eb := en // Yes, save it. if P(e, en, temp(k/kmax)) > random() then // Should we move to it? s := sn; e := en // Yes, change state. k := k + 1 // One more evaluation done return sb // Return the • E() is the objective function • neighbour(s) comes from perturbation on s

More Related