1 / 49

Developing a Student Flow Model to Project Higher Education Degree Production: Technical and Policy Consideration

Developing a Student Flow Model to Project Higher Education Degree Production: Technical and Policy Consideration. Takeshi Yanagiura Research Director Tennessee Higher Education Commission 5/21/2009 2009 SHEEO/NCES Network Conference. Main Points. Tennessee’s policy issues

mieko
Télécharger la présentation

Developing a Student Flow Model to Project Higher Education Degree Production: Technical and Policy Consideration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Developing a Student Flow Model to Project Higher Education Degree Production: Technical and Policy Consideration Takeshi Yanagiura Research Director Tennessee Higher Education Commission 5/21/2009 2009 SHEEO/NCES Network Conference

  2. Main Points • Tennessee’s policy issues • Student Flow Model Development • Findings • Policy Implications

  3. Tennessee Public Higher Education System • Main Roles of THEC • Coordinating Board • Develop a statewide master plan for higher education, reinforced by funding formula and performance funding • Develop higher education budget request and recommend tuition levels • Program approval • THEC Divisions • Academic Affairs • Fiscal Affairs • Policy, Planning, and Research • Legal and Regulatory Affairs • P-16 Initiatives/GEAR UP TN

  4. Tennessee’s Policy Interest and Issues • Increase in Educational Attainment Level • Increase in Degree Productivity • Limited Financial Support from Public Preparation are underway for 2010-2015 Master Plan • MOA • Listening tour across the state • NCHEMS Policy Audit

  5. Tennessee’s Policy Issues: 1. Educational Attainment • Direct correlation between personal income and educational attainment of residents • TN is ranked among the bottom 10 in the nation in educational attainment

  6. Tennessee’s Policy Issues: 2. Increase Degree Productivity

  7. Tennessee’s Policy Issues: 3. Prospect of Declining Public Funding for Higher Education

  8. Projections of Educational Attainment Level in US, SREB*, and Tennessee: 2007-2025 *SREB figures exclude Tennessee Source: NCHEMS

  9. Projected Tennessee's Gaps in Educational Attainment Relative to SREB and US Averages: 2007 - 2025 Source: THEC, NCHEMS

  10. Tennessee Imperative Improve higher education productivity Defined as “graduating more students with certificates and degrees for the money available to invest” • Participation in Making Opportunity Affordable (MOA) initiative. • MOA provides resources and a three-pronged framework to help states increase their public degree productivity: • Recast state finance systems to reward institutions for graduating students, not just enrolling them • Increase the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of academic programs and administrative operations; and • Align resources or creating new models to serve more students.

  11. Student Flow Model • Track progress patterns of various cohorts across the state’s public higher education system • Develop enrollment and completion projections for out-years based on patterns observed in the past

  12. Methodology • Cohort Survival Ratio • Generates enrollment and graduation projections for different student groups, based on past performance • The progression of each cohort was tracked from the fall 1997 term through spring 2007 • For each term during this time period, retention and graduation rates were calculated for every cohort • For projections of enrollment and completion beyond spring 2007, the exponential smoothing method was used

  13. Exponential Smoothing Method • The previous two years’ retention and graduation rates were used to estimate both retention and completion rates for each future term • Projection at year t+1= (a*actual data at year t) + (1-a)*(Actual data at year t-1) • a = 0.9

  14. Data Used to Build the Tool • Enrollment and Completion Data • All Undergraduate Fall 1997 – Spring 2007 • Following data are used: • THECID • System • Institution • Year and Term • Registration Code • Previous Registration Code • Student Level • Residency • Number of credit hours taken • College level • R&D

  15. Cohort • A total of 12 cohorts – each cohort progresses differently - See handouts • Freshman Cohort • Recent high school graduates enrolled as first-time freshmen • with dual enrollment credit • remedial or developmental education required • non-residents • Other • Adult Students (Age 25 and Up) • 20-24 years old

  16. Cohort (Continued) • Non-Freshman Cohort • Returning Students • Readmitted Students • Non-Degree seeking • TN Community College Transfers • Transfer from Other than TN Community Colleges • Dual Enrollment Students

  17. High School Graduation Rate (9th Grade) Out-state Institutions Private Institutions Still Enroll at Private Institutions Attend College In-state Institutions Public Institutions Not Attend College First-timeFreshmen, Recent HS Graduate, NonResident College-Ready (R&D Not Needed) Remedial & Developmental Education Needed Adult Population (Age 25-44) without College Degree Graduate from Private Institutions Population (Age 20-24) without College Degree UT, First-time Freshmen, Recent HS Graduate TBR 2-yr, First-time Freshmen, Recent HS Graduate TBR 4yr, TBR 4-yr, First-time Freshmen, Recent HS Graduate Still Enroll at UT Graduate from UT UT, First-time Freshmen TBR 2-yr, First-time Freshmen TBR 4yr, First-time Freshmen Workforce Still Enroll atTBR 2-yr Transfer from TN Community Colleges Graduate from TBR 2-yr UT, Non-Freshman Cohort TBR 4yr, Non-Freshman Cohort TBR 2-yr, Non-Freshman Cohort Still Enroll at TBR 4yr Graduate from TBR 4-yr Dual Enroll Readmitted Other Transfer Returning Non-Degree Student Flow Model: Conceptual Image

  18. Cohort DistributionUT Universities: Fall 2007

  19. Cohort DistributionTBR Universities: Fall 2007

  20. Cohort DistributionTBR Community Colleges: Fall 2007

  21. Cohort Distribution Summary

  22. Accuracy of the Projection • Compared predicted values to actual figures from 1997 to 2007

  23. Actual vs. Predicted:University of Tennessee System(Enrollment) Average Error Rate = 0.2% Error Rate (%)= (Actual – Projected)/Actual

  24. Actual vs. Predicted:University of Tennessee System(Completion) Average Error Rate = 0.4% Error Rate (%)= (Actual – Projected)/Actual

  25. Actual vs. Predicted:Tennessee Board of Regents Universities(Enrollment) Average Error Rate = -0.1% Error Rate (%)= (Actual – Projected)/Actual

  26. Actual vs. Predicted:Tennessee Board of Regents Universities(Completion – Bachelor Degrees) Average Error Rate = -1.4% Error Rate (%)= (Actual – Projected)/Actual

  27. Actual vs. Predicted:Tennessee Board of Regents Universities(Completion – Associate’s Degrees) Average Error Rate = 1.0% Error Rate (%)= (Actual – Projected)/Actual

  28. Actual vs. Predicted:Tennessee Board of RegentsCommunity Colleges(Enrollment) Average Error Rate = -0.5% Error Rate (%)= (Actual – Projected)/Actual

  29. Actual vs. Predicted:Tennessee Board of RegentsCommunity Colleges(Completion – Associate’s Degrees) Average Error Rate = -1.8% Error Rate (%)= (Actual – Projected)/Actual

  30. Projection Assumptions • Enrollment • Non-freshman cohort , except Community College Transfers and Dual Enrollees, will enter higher education at the same rate as in the past • For freshman cohort Age 20-24: students will enroll at the same rate as in the past • For adult students: • For-profit private institutions will increase adult enrollment by 5% every year (CAGR 2004-07 = 6.9%) • Not-for-profit private institutions will increase adult enrollment by 1% every year (CAGR 2004-07 = 4.4%) • The ratio of Fall Cohort to Spring Cohort will remain the same level of the average of previous three years

  31. Projection Assumptions(Continued) • Completions • Private institutions’ productivity remains the same • OLS: Degree Production = intercept + a*first-time freshman fall enrollment in the same year • Productivity of the Non-Freshman cohort remains the same • Degree production of for-profit institutions is not included in the completion model

  32. Projection Assumptions(Continued) • Transfer from Community Colleges to TBR Universities and UT • Each cohort group in TBR 2-yr institutions will transfer to these systems in the same manner in the past

  33. Variables • A Total of 14 Variables • High School Graduation Rate (9th Grades –data source: WICHE) • College-going rate (including students attending for-profit institutions and out-state institutions. Spring cohort freshmen are also included – data source: public – THEC, others - IPEDS) • Out-migration rate of Tennessee resident, recent high school graduates • % of Recent HS Grad, Resident First-time Freshmen Attending TICUA institutions • % of freshmen (recent HS grad first-time freshmen) needing at least one remedial/developmental course • Enrollment distribution of remedial freshmen in public institutions

  34. Variables (Continued) • Enrollment Share of Non-remedial Freshmen in Public Institutions • Non-Resident Freshmen (Recent HS Grad) as a % of Total First-time Recent HS Grad Freshmen • Age 25-44 student enrollment as a % of the same age population with high school diploma only • Enrollment Distribution of Adult Students • Dual Enrollment Participants per 100 Seniors (Both Public and Private High School) • 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Year Retention Rate

  35. Retention Assumptions • Even if retention rates of freshman cohorts increased, retention rates of non-freshman cohorts would remain constant • For spring freshman cohorts, their retention rates increase to the extent that the retention rate of fall freshman cohort increases

  36. Student Flow Model as a Policy Tool

  37. Policy Goal Long Term Goal • To reach the national average of educational attainment by 2025 Short-term Goal: Focus of Master Plan • To get on the “right track” in terms of degree productivity by 2015 to reach the goal by 2025

  38. Projections of Educational Attainment Level* in US and Tennessee: 2007-2025 269,164 additional degrees needed * Associates and up Source: NCHEMS

  39. Additional degrees Tennessee will need to produce every year to reach average regional and national educational attainment levels by 2025 US Total: 269,164

  40. Results:Current Projections of Degree Production(Both Public and Private*) *For-profit private institutions are not part of this analysis

  41. Scenario 1Improvement in Pre-college factors • High School Graduation increases from 71% to 76% by 2015 • College-going Rate increases from 65% to 70% by 2015 • Out-migration rate decreases from 13% to 8% by 2015 • Dual Enrollment per 100 high school seniors increases from 16 to 26 by 2015

  42. Scenario 1 Results:Projections of Degree Production (Both Public and Private*) *For-profit private institutions are not part of this analysis

  43. Scenario 2Improvement in College factors • % of freshmen (recent HS grad FTF) who need at least one remedial or developmental class decreases from 33% to 23% by 2015 • Increase Retention rates

  44. Scenario 2 Results:Projections of Degree Production(Both Public and Private*) *For-profit private institutions are not part of this analysis

  45. Scenario 3Combinations of Scenario 1 and 2

  46. Scenario 3 Results:Projections of Degree Production(Both Public and Private*) *For-profit private institutions are not part of this analysis

  47. Student Flow Model: Usefulness as Policy Tool • Data-based tool for goal-setting • Establishes a goal for increasing degree production and a “roadmap” for getting there • Shows importance of improving performance in both K-12 and higher education • Allows responsibility for increased degree production to be assigned to various systems • Shows where improvement gives the state the greatest “return” in terms of additional degrees

  48. Tennessee Policy Goals:To reach the regional average by 2025, how many degrees do we need to produce by 2015?

  49. Contact Takeshi Yanagiura 615-532-8017 Takeshi.yanagiura@tn.gov Student Flow Model can be found at http://thecreports.state.tn.us/FileControl.aspx

More Related