Glenbard Township High School District 87

1. Glenbard Township High School District 87 Facility Master Plan Steering Committee July 20, 2011

2. Today’s Activities… Steering Committee • Introduction: Purpose / LS Survey • What We’ve Heard: Direction/Survey • Highlights: What we’ve been doing • Programming: North, South, East, West • Discussion: Room Standards • Group Exercise: Classroom

3. Learning Styles Steering Committee How do you learn best… Learning Styles Survey What Learning Style are you?

4. Additional Input…Survey Results Steering Committee We’ve heard what staff representatives have to say… Survey Monkey But what about everybody else?

5. Additional Input…Survey Results District Wide Survey "The place where kids learn should be a space where they feel at home.  Students need to be comfortable in their own surroundings and have a sense of belonging.  They need to have multiple opportunities to modalities in order to grow."

6. Additional Input…Survey Results District Wide Survey "A classroom should be welcoming, and full of opportunity.  The typical desk arrangement should he a thing of the past... Students should sit at tables where they can collaborate.  The classroom should have technology that is engaging and allows for students to grasp concepts through doing, not sitting and getting.  Lectures should be INTERACTIVE with technology and hands on activities." "Learning styles should dictate learning...because there is such a variety in our students, the 'physical' should represent this variety, keeping in mind that students learn differently today than we did...and there is nothing wrong with that fact.  Modernizing these ideas only makes sense in trying to bridge the gap in their technology usage and overall learning."

7. Highlights: What we’ve been doing… Steering Committee • Focus Group Meetings: • APO/ Facility Meetings - Met with 4 of 4 Buildings • More Detailed Review of Facility Needs • Site; fields, parking, landscaping • Building Envelope; walls, doors, windows • Interiors; condition of materials • Building Systems; mechanical, plumbing, electrical • Review of 2002 Assessment • Discussed Opportunities for Expansion/ Reconfiguration

8. Highlights: What we’ve been doing… Steering Committee • Facilities Assessment: • Visual Observation of Existing Facilities • Interior Assessment of All Buildings Complete • Site Assessment of All Buildings Complete

9. Highlights: What we’ve been doing… Steering Committee • Capacity/Utilization: • Input of Enrollment Data • All Buildings Complete • Programs to be Reviewed with APO’s

10. Programming: Utilization/ Capacity Steering Committee • Glenbard North H.S.

11. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity • Issues/ Concerns • Site: • Site traffic flow is terrible. 70% drop-off and busses • Pavement quality is poor. Needs replacement • Need irrigation in fields (lower level baseball) • Need for Exterior Security Lighting • Review/ Replace Fire Hydrant Loop • Improve way-finding signage

12. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity • Issues/ Concerns • Classroom Size: • Need to determine District Standard for appropriate • Classroom Size • Science Labs • Majority of Labs designed to accommodate 24 Students • Labs need to be updated and ADA compliant • Labs should be appropriate for subject taught

13. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity • Issues/ Concerns • Cafeteria Space • Landlocked in center of building • Improve serving flow

14. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity Glenbard North • Issues/ Concerns • Office Locations • Main Office near main entry • P.P.S. located in center of building • Confusing main entry. Visitors don’t know where to enter • Main office would like to be closer to the students and • Entry 8 near where students enter.

15. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity • Issues/ Concerns • Other Concerns • Need for Student Life Space • Exterior canopies need to be addressed • Concern w/ Title 9: Girl’s Locker Facilities too small • Auditorium upgrades needed (floors, lighting, seating, equip,) • Exterior window frames in poor shape • Roofing needs • HVAC and Electrical concerns throughout (piping, wiring, etc.)

16. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity

17. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity Glenbard North

18. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity Glenbard North

19. Programming: Utilization/ Capacity Steering Committee • Glenbard South H.S.

20. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity • Issues/ Concerns • Site: • Synthetic Turf/ Track Lighting at Stadium • Need to expand home bleachers/ press box replacement • Tennis Courts ongoing issue: need to be relocated • Need Outdoor Storage for all sports • Flooding issues along North property line • Need for Exterior Security Lighting • Review/ Replace Fire Hydrant Loop • Siding, roofing, doors, frames and hardware an issue

21. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity • Issues/ Concerns • Classroom Size: • Need to determine District Standard for appropriate • Classroom Size • Science Labs • Majority of Labs designed to accommodate 28 Students • Asbestos Abatement at Tower Classrooms • Labs need to be updated and ADA compliant

22. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity • Issues/ Concerns • Cafeteria Space • Cafeteria expansion/ reconfiguration needed • Located adjacent to exterior wall: Expandable

23. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity Glenbard South • Issues/ Concerns • Office Locations • Office central in building footprint (landlocked) • Poor internal flow (walk through spaces for access) • Desire to move office to front to be more visible and functional

24. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity • Issues/ Concerns • Other Concerns • Need for Student Life Space • Locker Room Showers (car wash) needs updating • Concern w/ Title 9: Girl’s Locker Facilities too small • Door Hardware Failing • Auditorium upgrades needed (floors, lighting, seating, equip,) • Accessibility needed in athletic area • Accessibility needed throughout facility • HVAC and Electrical concerns throughout (piping, wiring, etc.)

25. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity

26. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity

27. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity

28. Programming: Utilization/ Capacity Steering Committee • Glenbard East H.S.

29. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity • Issues/ Concerns • Site: • Synthetic Turf at Stadium. Propose a 2nd turf field • (no regeneration time for existing fields) • Need for outdoor storage • All parking lots need to be re-surfaced • Need to review/ replace main fire hydrant loop

30. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity • Issues/ Concerns • Classroom Size: • Need to determine District Standard for appropriate • Classroom Size • Science Labs • Designed to accommodate 24 Students – Newer Labs 28 • Safety is primary concern • Need to determine District Standard for Lab Size

31. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity • Issues/ Concerns • Cafeteria Space • Current capacity: 750-850 (3 lunch periods) • Currently seat students in the hallway • Located adjacent to exterior wall: Expandable • Other Concerns • Need for Student Life Space • Look at classrooms for instructional storage space • Classroom lighting needs to be adjustable (dual level)

32. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity • Issues/ Concerns • Office Locations • Offices located on 2nd floor, above main entry • No real concern with size of offices

33. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity

34. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity Glenbard East

35. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity Floor Plan

36. Case Study: Utilization/ Capacity

37. Utilization/ Capacity • What are the variables in Capacity? Maximum enrollment =number of students per section Area per student = amount of space each student has in class Periods per day Demand = percentage of enrollment taking a course Class room size Scheduling Efficiency # of Teachers

38. Utilization/ Capacity What does it mean? Effective Capacity considers classroom flexibility Calculated Capacity determines the maximum enrollment (educational adequacy)

39. Utilization/ Capacity • Calculated Capacityis determined by: • Fixing the maximum class size per section • Utilize percentage of students taking each course (demand) • Calculating number of sections required • # of sections divided by classrooms available • Modulating enrollment to balance existing classrooms to • classrooms required • Classrooms required determined by formula • Does not address the size of the classroom/how class is taught

40. Utilization/ Capacity • Effective Capacityis determined by: • Fixing the area per student • Utilize percentage of students taking each course (demand) • Calculate number of sections required • Compare enrollment to existing class room size • Classrooms required determined by effective use of the room

41. Effective Capacity: Case Studies Recommend that a range is established

42. Effective Capacity: Discussion Preliminary Range: 25 to 30; 50 S.E.

43. Capacities Preliminary North Current Enrollment: 2,683 students Calculated Capacity: 3,363 students Effective Capacity: 2,964 – 3,370 students Enrollment Projection: 2264 students

44. Capacities Preliminary North North Classrooms =/> “standard” sf: 13 Classrooms < “standard” sf: 69 Classrooms at/above “standard”: 15.85%

45. Capacities Preliminary South South Current Enrollment: 1,404 students Calculated Capacity: 2,216 students Effective Capacity: 1,623 – 1,795 students Enrollment Projection: 1,210 students

46. Capacities Preliminary South Classrooms =/> “standard” sf: 9 Classrooms < “standard” sf: 45 Classrooms at/above “standard”: 20.00%

47. Capacities Preliminary East Current Enrollment: 2,525 students Calculated Capacity: 2,912 students Effective Capacity: 2,558 – 2,863 students Enrollment Projection: 2,634 students

48. Capacities Preliminary East East Classrooms =/> “standard” sf 29 Classrooms < “standard” sf: 54 Classrooms at/above “standard”: 34.94%

49. Capacities Preliminary West Current Enrollment: 2272 students Calculated Capacity: 2102 students Effective Capacity: 1611-1837 students Enrollment Projection: 2,264 students

50. Capacities Preliminary West Classrooms =/> “standard” sf 13 Classrooms < “standard” sf: 44 Classrooms at/above “standard”: 22.81%