1 / 32

Master Class

Master Class. Photo Here. Children and Youth in Difficult Life Situation Legal and Theoretical Framework, Best Practice and Tools Katarzyna Jarosiewicz-Wargan Almaty, 5 June 2012. Introductions. Let’s Get to Know Each Other. Content of Master Class.

mikkel
Télécharger la présentation

Master Class

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Master Class Photo Here Children and Youth in Difficult Life Situation Legal and Theoretical Framework, Best Practice and Tools Katarzyna Jarosiewicz-Wargan Almaty, 5 June 2012

  2. Introductions Let’s Get to Know Each Other

  3. Content of Master Class • Part I - Legal and theoretical framework • International legal instruments • Child development theories • Relevance to services for children and families • Part II – Selected best practice models and examples • Prevention of infant abandonment • Developing services alternative to institutional care • Part III – Selected tools • Standards of care • Individual service planning

  4. Part I LEGAL AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

  5. International legal instruments • Universal Declaration of Human Rights  • (December 1948) • Civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights • Human rights - universal, indivisible and interdependent • Some rights non-derogable (e.g. to life, to freedom from torture, to recognition before the law) • Declaration obliging States to respect, protect and fulfill rights

  6. International legal instruments • Convention on the Rights of the Child • (1989 / KAZ 1994) • Provision, Protection and Participation • 5 „umbrella rights”: to life, survival and development; best interests of the child; non-discrimination; participation; implementation with the maximum use of available resources • Convention legally binding for the State • Many UNCRC have special relevance to issues concerning children without parental care • Guidelines for the Appropriate Use and Conditions of Alternative Care (2009)

  7. Theoretical background Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory of development (1979)

  8. Theoretical background • Bowlby's attachment theory: • Attachment = “lasting psychological connectedness between human beings” = making strong emotional bond to a particular individual • Four characteristics: 1) proximity maintenance; 2) safe haven; 3) secure base and 4) separation distress • First to suggest a “possibility to help children by helping parents” and community role in child upbringing • Theory influenced policy and practice change on institutional care world-wide, including on individual approach and family-based care • Attachment disorder now internationally recognized as a mental health condition

  9. Applying rights and development theories perspective Needs-based versus rights-based approach Needs-based Approach12 Rights-based Approach

  10. Applying rights and development theories perspective Rights-based approach – right-holders and duty-bearers

  11. Applying rights and development theories perspective Public health model of social services for children and families

  12. Part II SELECTED BEST PRACTICE MODELS

  13. Prevention of infant abandonment • Around 800,000 children in residential care • in 27 C/EE countries (2007) • 76,000 in institutions in KAZ (2007) • 3% below 3 years of age • More than 95% children have at least one parent who is alive and known • Main issues: single mothers, teenage pregnancies, alcohol/drug dependency, poverty, mother’s own history of abandonment/abuse, child’s real or misdiagnosed disability

  14. Prevention of infant abandonment

  15. Prevention of infant abandonment

  16. Prevention of infant abandonment

  17. Prevention of infant abandonment

  18. Prevention of infant abandonment – the model • Steps to address the problem: • Study demographics and reasons of abandonment • Raise awareness • Create prevention/early intervention function in clinics and maternity houses • Define clear referral mechanisms and family identification procedures • Establish community services (emotional and practical support for families, mother and infant shelters, short-term foster care etc.) • Develop training programs and build capacity of frontline personnel (healthcare, social workers, community services’ staff, police) • Build coalitions, advocate for and support policy change

  19. Prevention of infant abandonment – examples • Pilot interaction of social and medical workers • at maternity hospitals (Ukraine) – 67% of mothers changed their intention to abandon their new-borns • Emergency mother and infant shelter + family and employment counseling (Georgia) – 80% of mothers found employment and decided to keep/take back their child • Training for doctors, maternity hospital personnel and social workers on surgical treatment of infant cleft palate (Kyrgyzstan) – in 2 years no new abandonments • Support centers for parents and families of new-borns + foster care as an alternative for institutionalization (Bulgaria) – 1 infant home closed already, 8 others to be closed by 2014

  20. Transforming Institutions, Developing Alternatives Mulheir and Browne’s Ten-Step Model

  21. Transforming Institutions, Developing Alternatives

  22. Transforming Institutions, Developing Alternatives

  23. Transforming Institutions, Developing Alternatives

  24. Transforming Institutions, Developing Alternatives

  25. Transforming Institutions, Developing Alternatives; Examples • Assessment of all children in institutional care • as a step towards family reintegration (Slovakia) • Massive staff capacity building for transforming large-scale institutions into small family-like units (Hungary) • Development of small-group homes and other community services as an alternative to institutions (Georgia)

  26. Part III SELECTED PRACTICAL TOOLS

  27. Standards of care – the model • Place child/family and CRC principles • at the center of service provision • Provide basis for regulating childcare • Provide a basis for induction and training of staff • Offer framework for monitoring quality of care (incl. self-assessment by service provider)  help improve quality of childcare • Should be developed through intensive consultation with users, service providers and related authorities • Can be developed and piloted locally by civil society groups  eventually to be adopted nationally

  28. Standards of care – the model • Standards should cover broad range of topics: • Information about the service, • Care plan and its revisions, • Physical environment, • Quality of care, • Staffing, • Complaints and protection • Management and administration

  29. Standards of care – examples • Standards as a basis to define professional qualification requirements for care-takers, and design mandatory training programs (Estonia) • Childcare standards incorporated in legislation that regulates registration and licensing of service, including number of children in care and child-staff ratios (Poland) • State outsourcing childcare services on the basis of national minimum standards (Lithuania) • Standards-based monitoring/research of out-of-home care to identify improvements for children (Latvia)

  30. Child-focused and family-centered individual service planning • Mandatory in most European countries • Done always, to the maximum extent possible, with participation of and in agreement with the child and his/her parents and family • Defines two-way responsibility – that of the child/family and that of service provider • Needs to involve multiple professionals • Based on individually assessed strengths/resources and needs of the child and family

  31. Child-focused and family-centered individual service planning • Must have realistic short-, medium- and long-term goals • For any child in residential care, should contribute to permanency planning, with one of three outcomes: • reintegration, • foster care/adoption or • independent living • Must be regularly revised, especially for children in especially difficult situations (e.g. in residential care)

  32. Master Class Photo Here THANK YOU!

More Related