230 likes | 380 Vues
The paper discusses the challenges and benefits of integrating smart grid technologies through simplified inter-domain communication standards. Emphasizing the need for resource optimization rather than an excessive focus on processes, it highlights how simple interfaces can facilitate interoperability without being bound to rigid protocols. The author, Toby Considine, underscores the importance of defining business needs and employing scalable security measures. Leveraging insights from multiple stakeholders, this work aims to improve energy management while promoting economic alignment in the evolving landscape of energy services.
E N D
OASIS Standards for smart grids Light, loose integration for inter-domain communicationsToby Considine TC9, Inc
Smart grids are meant to save resources through improved awareness and control
Inappropriate focus on process can actually waste resources • "If something is not worth doing, it`s not worth doing well" - Peter Drucker
Simple Interfaces let us optimize interoperable services without committing to fixed processes
Perspectives • Infrastructure Analyst, UNC • OASIS Technical Advisory Board • NIST Smart Grid Business & Policy WG • NIST Smart Grid Roadmap team • Chair, OASIS oBIX TC • Editor, OASIS Energy Interaction TC • Editor, OASIS EMIX TC • Convener, WS-Calendar
Interacting with complex objects is hard Simplified schematic of flatworm nervous system
We use composite protocols and security when we want them to scale. HTML IMAP / POP3 SMTP TELNET URIs ASCII / Unicode TCP IP
Building-based agents will act as personal day traders in new energy markets • System agents defend mission • Enterprise (or home) defines value • Power Grid offers clearing market • Building agents choreograph response
Zero net energy buildings will require ever more integration
Power Load Management (TC57) Financial Instruments (ISO20022) Enterprise Scheduling (CalConnect) Three CIMs for inter-domain interaction
Energy Interoperation TC • Interactions for DR and DER • Distinguishes between Managed and Collaborative energy • Direct load management by the utility or service provider • Economic messages to align interests. • Contributions • OpenADR from Lawrence Berkeley Labs • Business cases from NAESB
Energy Market Information Exchange TC (EMIX) • Price and Product communication • Price is neither tariffs nor pricing • Energy characteristics of interest to consumer • Volatile products are time dependent
Schedules for the internet of things (WS-Calendar) • Calendaring & Scheduling Consortium • IETF RFC 2445, 2446, 2447 – now RFC 5545… • Standard XML serialization • Common semantics for interactions in • Enterprise • Energy • Buildings • Finance • (PIMs and Vehicles)
Discussion Toby.Considine @ gmail.comwww.newDaedalus.com