180 likes | 317 Vues
This presentation outlines the initiatives at Southern Illinois University Carbondale (SIUC) to streamline degree pathways and implement early-warning interventions aimed at improving student success. Key components include reducing general education credit hours, eliminating course redundancies, and adopting predictive metrics to support timely degree completion. The program has led to increased retention and graduation rates by providing data-driven support structures for students. Insights into the challenges and lessons learned highlight the importance of institutional commitment and cross-departmental cooperation.
E N D
Guided Pathways to Success at SIUC Combining streamlined degree paths with early-warning intervention • Scaling Up: Effective Practices in Higher Education October 31st , 2013
Presentation Outline • Some background and definitions • A look at the Process Flowchart (Logic Model) • Essential Components • General Education Credit Hour Reduction • Remove course redundancies across programs • Where we are at SIUC • Predictive capability of “Early intervention metrics” • Flexible Components • Lessons Learned and Potential Pitfalls
Purpose and Outcomes • Purpose • Removing barriers to and providing support for successful degree completion • Provide data-driven support structures for students to remain on degree paths • Outcomes • Increased retention rates • Increased graduation rates • Easily calculated metrics
Essential Components • Top-level Institutional Commitment • Broad-based General Education Faculty Committee • Significant institutional buy-in to curricular technology platforms for student data collection (For Early Warning system)
General Education Credit Hour Reduction • General Education requirements represent the first programmatic step in the process of streamlining degrees • The requirements cut across degree programs, so streamlining has broad impact • Institutionally, it is (almost) mandatory to have a well-respected faculty committee that oversees this work • The work at SIU is done by the “Core Curriculum Executive Council”
Core Curriculum Reduction at SIU Creativity and flexibility required for “double dipping” across degree paths • STEM Fields • Students in use advanced courses in science and math to satisfy general education requirements in these categories. • Microeconomics or Macroeconomics satisfies a general education requirement in Social Science. • Art and Design • Students take courses in Art History to satisfy their general education Humanities requirement
Remove course redundancies across programs • Much harder work, since it involves program changes at department level • Again, look for changes with broad impact in areas that cut across Colleges and Departments • Work can often help to reconsider the design of important courses • Example: Statistics
Statistics Redesign at SIUC • Why the proliferation of Statistics courses? • Those (**%#*%!!) Mathematicians just want to teach Math! • “Our” program is special. It requires both a statistics course and an experimental design course. (Because “our” experiments are really special!) • Cooperation from the Chairs of Math and Educational Psychology • Core Statistics and Research Design taught in Large Lecture Sections with Hybrid/Flipped classrooms (1 lecture a week) • Twice a week students meet in small departmental level section in computer labs for discipline specific material • Win-win for departments by optimizing faculty resources.
OK-Now we’ve got the degree path. How do we keep them on it? • Keeping students on the optimally designed degree path is at least as important as designing the degree path. • Computer-aided instruction (CAI) platforms permit real-time data retrieval. • CAI allows integration across programs and courses.
Early Intervention Metric in Math at SIU • Week 3 • For all students in Math 107-108 (Intermediate Algebra/College Algebra) • 25%*(In-class pretest) + 25%*(HW) + 50%*(Test 1) • 25% (preparation) + 25%(motivation) + 50% (achievement) • RED: 0% to 55% • ORANGE: 56% to 65% • YELLOW: 65% to 75% • GREEN: 76% to 100% • Students also receive an intervention score in week 7 and week 11 that is simply their course grade at that time. • All of this data is given to the students and to colleges and advising staff.
Does the Early Intervention Metric Correctly Identify Students? • Intermediate Algebra : Success rate of Week 3 metric (C or better) • Red/Orange 22/86 (25.6%) • Yellow 5/12 (41.6%) • Green 54/64 (84.4%) • College Algebra : Success rate of Week 3 metric (C or better) • Red/Orange 31/155 (20%) • Yellow 18/40 (45%) • Green 142/193 (73.6%)
Early-intervention platforms for student data collection • The success of the Early Intervention System in Math has prompted the SIUC Provost to put together a Task-force on Early Intervention Technology. • Coordinate data collection and metrics across critical gateway courses • Coordinate software platforms for seamless integration of data
What are the Flexible Components for your campus? • Mechanism for General Education streamlining • Campus curricular integration methods. • Campus course articulation and course equivalencies • Early intervention metric structure
Lessons Learned and Potential Pitfalls • Strong leadership an essential requirement • Departments will try to protect credit hour generation and core courses. • Try to create "win-win" situations when eliminating course redundancies.