1 / 15

Testing Hypotheses II

Testing Hypotheses II. Lesson 10. A Directional Hypothesis (1-tailed). Does reading to young children increase IQ scores? m = 100, s = 15, n = 25 sample mean also same z obs will be the same as 2-tailed test Differences from nondirectional hypotheses critical region ~.

mmaxine
Télécharger la présentation

Testing Hypotheses II

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Testing Hypotheses II Lesson 10

  2. A Directional Hypothesis (1-tailed) • Does reading to young children increase IQ scores? • m = 100, s = 15, n = 25 • sample mean also same • zobs will be the same as 2-tailed test • Differences from nondirectional • hypotheses • critical region ~

  3. A Directional Hypothesis 1. State hypotheses • H1: m > 100 • Reading to young children will increase IQ scores. • H0: m< 100 • Reading to young children will decrease or not change IQ scores. ~

  4. A Directional Hypothesis 2. Set criterion for rejecting H0 • a = .05, level of significance • directional (one-tailed) test • zCV = +1.645 • critical value for area = .05 • in upper tail ~

  5. -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +1.645 Critical Regions a = .05 zCV = + 1.645 f

  6. 3. Collect sample & compute statistics n = 25

  7. -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +1.645 Critical Regions a = .05 zCV = + 1.645 f

  8. 4. Interpret Results • Is zobsin the critical region? • yes • reject H0, accept H1 • These data suggest that reading to young children does increase IQ. • Difference is statistically significant • but not for 2-tailed test • lower criterion than 2-tailed ~

  9. Significance of Result • If reject H0 • Statistical significance • difference between groups is ... greater than expected by chance alone • Does NOT say it is meaningful • Even very small effects can be statistically significant • How? ~

  10. Significance of Result • If fail to reject H0 • Data are inconclusive • Does not mean that there is no difference • Why might there be a Type II error? ~

  11. Practical Significance • Extent to which difference is important • Magnitude of effect • Independent of statistical significance • Effect size • APA recommends it be reported • Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r • Will cover later • Cohen’s d ~

  12. Effect Size: Cohen’s d • Standardized measure • Units of standard deviation • General form • For z test:

  13. Evaluating Effect Size: Cohen’s d • Cohen’s d • Small: d = 0.2 • Medium: d = 0.5 • High: d = 0.8 For t-test:

  14. Significance Testing: Issues • Focus on H0 rather than data • H0 is always false • Small differences can be statistically significant • Focus on results of single study rather than accumulation • Focus on a, ignoring b • Focuson p-values misleading • Dichotomyvs continuum ~

  15. Significance Testing: Alternatives • Criticized by some scientists • As inappropriate • Alternatives • Confidence intervals • Effect size • Meta-analysis ~

More Related