1 / 67

Physiological Data Modeling Contest

Physiological Data Modeling Contest. An ICML-2004 Workshop, July 8, 2004. Revelation of Contexts. Context 1 – Annotation 3004 Context 2 – Annotation 5102. Watching TV. Sleep. Revelation of Channels. Explanation of Channels. gsr_average Measures sweat (conductivity across the skin)

moana
Télécharger la présentation

Physiological Data Modeling Contest

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Physiological Data Modeling Contest An ICML-2004 Workshop, July 8, 2004

  2. Revelation of Contexts • Context 1 – Annotation 3004 • Context 2 – Annotation 5102 Watching TV Sleep

  3. Revelation of Channels

  4. Explanation of Channels • gsr_average • Measures sweat (conductivity across the skin) • Unit: micro Siemens • heat_flux_average • Measures heat lost to the environment • Unit: Watts/meter^2 • near_body_temp_average • Measures temperature near armband • Unit: degrees Centigrade • pedometer • Measures number of steps • Unit: steps • skin_temp_average • Measures temperature of skin in contact with armband • Unit: degrees Centigrade

  5. Explanation of Channels • longitudinal_accelerometer_SAD • Measures Sum of Absolute Differences of vertical acceleration • Unit: g • longitudinal_accelerometer_average • Measures average of vertical acceleration • Unit: g • transverse_accelerometer_SAD • Measures Sum of Absolute Differences of horizontal acceleration • Unit: g • transverse_accelerometer_average • Measures average of horizontal acceleration • Unit: g

  6. Revelation of Set Distributions

  7. Brown – Zodiac • Summary of Approaches • Approach 1: No Chars • Approach 2: 1 Char • Approach 3: 2 Chars

  8. Brown – Zodiac – Predictions Approach 1: No Chars

  9. Brown – Zodiac – Results Approach 1: No Chars

  10. Brown – Zodiac – Predictions Approach 2: 1 Char

  11. Brown – Zodiac – Results Approach 2: 1 Char

  12. Brown – Zodiac – Predictions Approach 3: 2 Chars

  13. Brown – Zodiac – Results Approach 3: 2 Chars

  14. Brown – Zodiac – Summary

  15. Daimler Chrysler Research And Technology India • Summary of Approaches • Approach 1: Raw Data • Approach 2: PCA

  16. Daimler Chrysler Research And Technology India – Predictions Approach 1: Raw Data

  17. Daimler Chrysler Research And Technology India – Results Approach 1: Raw Data

  18. Daimler Chrysler Research And Technology India – Predictions Approach 2: PCA

  19. Daimler Chrysler Research And Technology India – Results Approach 2: PCA

  20. Daimler Chrysler Research And Technology India – Summary

  21. Leader Board

  22. National Library of Medicine • Summary of Approaches • Approach 1: mDSB 1 • Approach 2: mDSB 2 • Approach 3: Simple Bayesian

  23. National Library of Medicine – Predictions Approach 1: mDSB 1

  24. National Library of Medicine – Results Approach 1: mDSB 1

  25. National Library of Medicine – Predictions Approach 2: mDSB 2

  26. National Library of Medicine – Results Approach 2: mDSB 2

  27. National Library of Medicine – Predictions Approach 3: Simple Bayesian

  28. National Library of Medicine – Results Approach 3: Simple Bayesian

  29. National Library of Medicine – Summary

  30. Leader Board

  31. University of Texas Austin – Saurabh Amin • Summary of Approach

  32. University of Texas Austin – Saurabh Amin – Predictions

  33. University of Texas Austin – Saurabh Amin – Results

  34. University of Texas Austin – Saurabh Amin – Summary

  35. Leader Board

  36. CMU – Informedia • Summary of Approaches • Approach 1: 50/50 • Approach 2: All Negative • Approach 3: Semi-Supervised

  37. CMU – Informedia – Predictions Approach 1: 50/50

  38. CMU – Informedia – Results Approach 1: 50/50

  39. CMU – Informedia – Predictions Approach 2: All Negative

  40. CMU – Informedia – Results Approach 2: All Negative

  41. CMU – Informedia – Predictions Approach 3: Semi-Supervised

  42. CMU – Informedia – Results Approach 3: Semi-Supervised

  43. CMU – Informedia – Summary

  44. Leader Board

  45. University of Porto – João Gama • Summary of Approach • Approach: Ultra Fast Forrest of Trees

  46. University of Porto – João Gama – Predictions Approach: Ultra Fast Forrest of Trees

  47. University of Porto – João Gama – Results Approach: Ultra Fast Forrest of Trees

  48. University of Porto – João Gama – Summary

  49. Leader Board

  50. Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique • Summary of Approaches • Approach 1: Voting Procedure • Approach 2: Weighted Voting Procedure

More Related