1 / 39

22 Ne@131 MeV + 208 Pb: a PRISMA+CLARA data analysis

22 Ne@131 MeV + 208 Pb: a PRISMA+CLARA data analysis. Paolo Mason. Part 1 From raw data to mass spectra. PRISMA+CLARA: the set-up. Dipole. Quadrupole. Target. Ionization chamber [IC]. Start detector [MCP]. Focal plane [PPAC]. Rotating platform. PRISMA+CLARA: measured quantities.

molimo
Télécharger la présentation

22 Ne@131 MeV + 208 Pb: a PRISMA+CLARA data analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 22Ne@131 MeV + 208Pb:a PRISMA+CLARA data analysis Paolo Mason

  2. Part 1From raw data to mass spectra

  3. PRISMA+CLARA: the set-up Dipole Quadrupole Target Ionization chamber [IC] Start detector [MCP] Focal plane [PPAC] Rotating platform

  4. PRISMA+CLARA: measured quantities • - Time of flight → directly involved in calculation of speed, therefore of • mass [mv2/R=qBv → m=qB•R/v] • Q-value • γ-ray energies (Doppler correction) • Entrance and focal-plane space coordinates → used to reconstruct • total distance D covered inside PRISMA (v = D/TOF) • trajectory’s curvature radius R in dipole magnet • Energy released in IC (each section) → used to select events (Z and q) • γ-rays→ (even when not of intrinsic interest, anyway) VERY useful to • check Z, A attributions • “calibrate” the TOF (Doppler correction) • understand Q-value spectra.

  5. The MCP (entrance) detector • Three signals of interest: • entrance X coordinate • entrance Y coordinate • TOF start • Actions: • noise removal • “calibration” of X,Y signals MCP Y [a.u.] MCP Y [a.u.] MCP X [arb. units] MCP X [arb. units] coincidence with some focal-plane signal

  6. Enhancing the focal-plane efficiencywith the cathode signal 1/2 Establishing link between values of Xfp determined with/without Scathode Removing cathode noise Sec. #3 Sec. #3 (Sleft+Sright)/2[a.u.] (Sright-Sleft)/4[a.u.] Scathode [arb. units] 1083 (Scathode-Sleft)/2[a.u.] 3141 Light ions produce weak signals which may be cut by CFD thresholds → Need to use the cathode signal when the left or right signal is not there 3000 987 Scathode/left/right = cathode/left/right signal

  7. Enhancing the focal-plane efficiencywith the cathode signal 2/2 Without cathode signal With cathode signal R/v [arb. units] R/v [arb. units] 0 1023 focal-plane X [mm] 0 1023 focal-plane X [mm]

  8. 2762 TOF [10-10 sec] arb. offsetS 1382 0 1023 2762 focal-plane X [mm] TOF [10-10 sec] arb. offset 1382 0 1023 focal-plane X [mm] Coarse matching of TOF offsets PPAC sections have different TOF offsets → need to match them …however, we may still have an arbitrary common TOF offset

  9. Bquadrupole/Bdipole optimization (Bq/Bd)1/2=0.99 R/v [arb. units] (Bq/Bd)1/2=0.96 (Bq/Bd)1/2=0.93 72 1013 129 458 focal-plane X [mm] Xfp [mm]

  10. TOF [10-10 sec] arb. offset D/R [arb. units] Fine matching of TOF offsets& removal of common TOF offset Cuts from Xfp vs R/v Counts R/v [arb. units] (*) (*) Also check Xfp-R/v plot: a nonzero common TOF offset warps the (supposed-to-be) straight horizontal traces.

  11. Mg Ne Na F O Energy release in IC [arb. units] Range in IC [arb. units] Z selection

  12. q=10+ q=9+ q=8+ Energy in IC [a.u.] 22Ne (must be) Z=10, qint=10 Neon DR/TOF [arb. units] Z=10, qint=9 counts Z=10, qint=8 17.59Ne ??? qintR/v [arb. units] qB selection - a first qR/v spectrum mv2/R = qBv → mv2/2 = 1/2 qB Rv m = qB R/v Must be more careful in selecting events

  13. Neon R/v [arb. units] Neon EIC/v2 [arb. units] Without (E/v2,R/v) bananas With (E/v2,R/v) bananas R/v [arb. units] Z=10, qint=10 Z=10, qint=9 counts Z=10, qint=8 EIC/v2 [arb. units] qintR/v [arb. units] qintR/v [arb. units] EIC/v2 vs R/v plots (E/v2,R/v) bananas give the possibility to remove spurious peaks. They may also serve as a tool to separate charge states.

  14. Z=12, qint=11 Z=11, qint=11 counts Z=11, qint=10 Z=12, qint=10 qintR/v [arb. units] Recognizing peaks - aligning R/v spectra R/v spectra corresponding to different charge states can be aligned just by a scaling (the scaling factor being, in principle, the charge). (1) A=23 from comparison with Z=10, qint=10 (*) spectrum (3) (2) A=23 from comparison with Z=11, qint=10 spectrum (3) A=26 from comparison with Z=11, qint=10,11 spectra (2) (1) (3) Once spectra corresponding to (common Z, but) different qint‘s are aligned, they can be summed and calibrated. (*) qint values are determined – comparatively – by looking at traces’ slopes in R•v vs EIC plot (**) If you find it downright outrageous to think of “fractional charges”, you might as well use integer scaling factors – along with nonzero offsets, though

  15. 3102 100 • mass [a.m.u.] 1424 0 1023 Xfp [mm] One last check: Xfp vs mass Neon FWHM/centroid = 9.8•10-3

  16. At last… mass yields A=26 Mg 101 103 A=23 Na 102 101 106 A=22 Ne 104 Counts 102 A=21 F 103 102 101 O A=20 102 101 Mass [a.m.u.]

  17. A brief summary • MCP detector: noise removal & “calibration” • PPAC detector: usage of cathode signal to enhance efficiency • Coarse matching of TOF offsets • Optimization of Bquad/Bdip & fine matching of TOF offsets + Removal of residual TOF common offset • Z selection • Charge-state selection from R•v-EIC , E/v2-R/v plots • Alignment of R/v spectra • Calibration of qR/v spectra → mass spectra • One needs not worry about scaling the TOF’s (to their “true” value) if he’s happy with mass spectra. • But to get γ-ray energies and Q-values right he has to.

  18. Part 2Gamma spectra

  19. Eγ= 777 keV 13 counts Eγ= 350 keV 45 counts Gammas in coincidence with Z=10, A=21 EγDoppler correction with βtarget-like EγDoppler correction with βprojectile-like Level scheme from NNDC ENSDF database

  20. Eγ= 2613 keV 95 counts Eγ= 1275 keV 530 counts Eγ= 583 keV 149 counts Eγ= 509 keV 95 counts Gammas in coincidence with Z=10, A=22 EγDoppler correction with βtarget-like EγDoppler correction with βprojectile-like Level scheme from NNDC ENSDF database

  21. Eγ= 1770 keV 29 counts Eγ= 1704 keV 22 counts Eγ= 1016 keV 98 counts Eγ= 898 keV 29 counts Eγ= 569 keV 321 counts Eγ= 492 keV 45 counts Gammas in coincidence with Z=10, A=23 EγDoppler correction with βtarget-like EγDoppler correction with βprojectile-like Level scheme from NNDC ENSDF database

  22. Eγ= 2784 keV 6 counts Eγ= 1983 keV 42 counts Eγ= 881 keV 20 counts Eγ= 802 keV 80 counts Eγ= 537 keV 24 counts Gammas in coincidence with Z=10, A=24 EγDoppler correction with βtarget-like EγDoppler correction with βprojectile-like Level scheme from NNDC ENSDF database

  23. Eγ= 440 keV 13 counts Eγ= 351 keV 10 counts Gammas in coincidence with Z=11, A=23 EγDoppler correction with βtarget-like EγDoppler correction with βprojectile-like Level scheme from NNDC ENSDF database

  24. Eγ= 721 keV 4 counts Eγ= 204 keV 6 counts Gammas in coincidence with Z=11, A=25 EγDoppler correction with βtarget-like EγDoppler correction with βprojectile-like Level scheme from NNDC ENSDF database

  25. Eγ= 656 keV 8 counts Eγ= 167 keV 7 counts Gammas in coincidence with Z=9, A=20 EγDoppler correction with βtarget-like EγDoppler correction with βprojectile-like Level scheme from NNDC ENSDF database

  26. Eγ= 1606 keV 9 counts Eγ= 896 keV 20 counts Eγ= 822 keV 16 counts Eγ= 278 keV 26 counts Gammas in coincidence with Z=9, A=21 EγDoppler correction with βtarget-like EγDoppler correction with βprojectile-like Level scheme from NNDC ENSDF database

  27. Eγ= 629 keV 6 counts Eγ= 245 keV 8 counts Gammas in coincidence with Z=8, A=20 EγDoppler correction with βtarget-like EγDoppler correction with βprojectile-like Level scheme from NNDC ENSDF database

  28. Part 3Q-values

  29. Mass vs Q-value - Z=12 -Q [MeV] Mass [a.m.u.] Mg A=25 26 27 28 -Q=-0.04 MeV 22Ne+208Pb→ AMg+229-AHg + n -3.6 -4.1 -4.8 -Q=-5.7 MeV 22Ne+208Pb→ AMg+230-AHg -10.1 -11.1 -12.6 Q-values from NNDC Q-value calculator

  30. Mass vs Q-value - Z=11 -Q value [MeV] Mass [a.m.u.] Na A=23 24 25 26 -Q=6.1 MeV 5.6 5.2 4.1 22Ne+208Pb→ ANa+229-ATl + n 22Ne+208Pb→ ANa+230-ATl -0.9 -Q=-0.8 MeV -1.4 -3.4 Q-values from NNDC Q-value calculator

  31. Mass vs Q-value - Z=10 -Q value [MeV] Mass [a.m.u.] Ne A=21 22 23 24 25 -Q=10.4 MeV 10.6 8.9 22Ne+208Pb→ ANe+229-APb + n 7.4 8.1 22Ne+208Pb→ ANe+230-APb -Q=6.4 MeV 3.9 2.2 0.04 0.0 Q-values from NNDC Q-value calculator

  32. Mass vs Q-value - Z=9 -Q value [MeV] Mass [a.m.u.] F A=19 20 21 22 23 -Q=21.6 MeV 21.1 20.6 22Ne+208Pb→ AF+229-ABi + n 19.6 18.9 22Ne+208Pb→ AF+230-ABi -Q=16.4 MeV 15.0 13.7 13.0 11.5 Q-values from NNDC Q-value calculator

  33. Mass vs Q-value - Z=8 -Q value [MeV] Mass [a.m.u.] O A=17 18 19 20 21 22 30.0 -Q=26.7 MeV 28.4 22Ne+208Pb→ AO+229-APo + n 25.2 25.3 24.6 22Ne+208Pb→ AO+230-APo -Q=22.3 MeV 21.5 21.6 20.7 18.6 17.6 Q-values from NNDC Q-value calculator

  34. Eγ=1968 keV Eγ [keV] target-like Doppler Eγ= 629 keV 210Po 8+→8+ Eγ= 245 keV 210Po 4+→2+ Eγ=0 keV -Q=13.0 MeV -Q=28.5 MeV -Q [MeV] Q-value vs Gammas - Z=8, A=20 selection Eγ=1968 keV 32 counts 29 counts Eγ [keV] target-like Doppler Eγ=0 keV -Q=7.5 MeV -Q=25.3 MeV -Q=53 MeV -Q value [MeV] 22Ne+208Pb →20O+209Po+n corresponds to Q-value = -25.3 MeV [NNDC]

  35. Selection: Z=10, A=23 23Ne 206Pb 2+→0+ 803 keV 23Ne -Q ≥ 9.5 MeV 206Pb counts 207Pb 5/2-→1/2- 570 keV -2.0 ≤ -Q ≤ 9.0 MeV 1n pick-up 2n pick-up 207Pb 3/2-→1/2- 898 keV 207Pb 7/2-→5/2- 1770 keV 206Pb Eγ [keV] target-like Doppler Signature of one-neutron evaporation following one- or two-neutron pick-up 22Ne+208Pb →23Ne+206Po+n corresponds to Q-value = -8.9 MeV [NNDC]

  36. Coincidence with CLARA 102 101 104 counts 102 Maximal EIC 103 101 Q-value [MeV] -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 207Pb 5/2-→1/2- 570 keV 7.5 ≤ -Q ≤ 36.0 MeV 208Pb 511 keV 3.5 ≤ -Q ≤ 7.0 MeV 208Pb 51-→3- 583 keV 208Pb 583 keV counts counts 208Pb 52-→51- 511 keV 208Pb 3-→0+ 2615 keV -3.5 ≤ -Q ≤ 1.0 MeV 22Ne 2+→0+ wrong Doppler Eγ [keV] target-like Doppler Eγ [keV] Understanding the Q-value spectrum in coincidence with the detection of 22Ne 22Ne+208Pb →22Ne+207Pb+n corresponds to Q-value = -7.4 MeV [NNDC]

  37. Thank Nicu for • training • additional programming • standing the hassle that I gave to him The end

  38. 23Ne 23Ne 206Pb 1n pick-up 2n pick-up 206Pb

More Related