1 / 6

Role of Stage III reviews

Role of Stage III reviews. Kristin Rypdal, TFEIP Chair. Re-organisation of emission work. MSC-W has offered to hand over most of the emission work Proposal to establish a new EMEP Center for emissions Internal discussions on institutions and tasks Conclusions at EMEP SB and EB

mstaci
Télécharger la présentation

Role of Stage III reviews

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Role of Stage III reviews Kristin Rypdal, TFEIP Chair

  2. Re-organisation of emission work • MSC-W has offered to hand over most of the emission work • Proposal to establish a new EMEP Center for emissions • Internal discussions on institutions and tasks • Conclusions at EMEP SB and EB • Documents available in June • Transition period

  3. Role of Stage III reviews • Stage I formal compliance checking • Timeliness, completeness and formats • Stage II flag potential problems • Stage III make assessments • Recommendations to the Party • Recommendations to the Convention

  4. Role of Stage III reviews (2) • Compliance assessed by the Implementation Commitee (IC) • Timeliness of submissions and emission levels • Non-technical mostly legal experts • It is proposed that the IC will receive information about data quality • They may wish to consider data quality in its work

  5. Role of Stage III reviews (3) • TFEIP may submit a message to the IC on data quality of individual Parties • Brief and non-technical • Directly relevant to the work of the IC • Underestimations • Recalculations • Only applicable for pollutants under a signed protocol • Relation to bilateral consultations

  6. Communication • Reports to the IC need to go via TFEIP • Would TFEIP wish to address this in plenary or establish a sub-group with a particular mandate • ERT reports • Assessed by expert panel on review or a new task group? • Report to EMEP SB and IC • IC may suggest Parties for review • EB endorsement

More Related