1 / 48

Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions Presentation to the Second Meeting of the WYE CITY GROUP ON STATISTICS ON RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND AGRICULTURE HOUSEHOLD INCOME June 11 – 12, 2009 Rome, Italy Ray D. Bollman Statistics Canada.

naava
Télécharger la présentation

Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions Presentation to the Second Meeting of the WYE CITY GROUP ON STATISTICS ON RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND AGRICULTURE HOUSEHOLD INCOME June 11 – 12, 2009 Rome, Italy Ray D. Bollman Statistics Canada

  2. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions • Outline • Introduction • What is the Agricultural-Population Linkage database? • 1: Understanding household earnings: patterns and change over time • The way farm earnings are received by household members • Structure of agricultural holdings by business size • Increasing labour force participation rates by women • Regional patterns • 2: Typology of farmers versus a typology of farms • 3: Labour supply generated by census-farm operator households • 4: Typology of households by farm<>non-farm work patterns • 5: Do young(er) operators have agricultural-related post- secondary education? • 6. Summary • References • Appendix A: The Agriculture-Population Linkage: An Overview of the Methodology • Appendix B: Selected studies based, in whole or in part, on the Agriculture-Population Linkage database

  3. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions • Outline • Introduction • Farming families and family farms remain a policy focus in Canada. • The Canadian Agriculture-Population Linkage database is a unique database that assembles: • the characteristics of the agricultural holding (from the Census of Agriculture questionnaire); and • the characteristics of each member of the household of each operator of an agricultural holding (from the Census of Population questionnaire). • In this paper, we have pursued selected topics to illustrate the utility of this database.

  4. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions • Summary • During the 1990s, 20% of the earnings of all census-farm operator households (CFOH) were received as unincorporated net farm income. • CFOH members may receive agric. earnings as wages or dividends. • During the 1990s, estimated “agric. labour and capital earnings” was about 30% of total household earnings. • This is most important for CFOH associated with larger ag. holdings. • The distrib. of agric. holdings, according to the capacity to provide a net farm inc. above the low inc. cut-off, has not changed – suggesting little change in the demand for CFOH to find other sources of earnings. • Est. agric. labour and capital earnings, as a % of total hshld. earnings, has declined for CFOH associated with each size of agric. holding. • A typology of “farmers” cross-tab. with a typology of “farms” shows no one-to-one mapping of operators as “farmers” and holdings as “farms” • Within CFOH, more women are “measured” in the labour force and most are working in non-farm occupations. • Males in CFOH shifted (a bit) from a farm to a non-farm occupation. • Institutions providing agric.-related post-sec. educ. have reached 15% to 42% (depending upon the prov.) of the younger operators of “viable” farms.

  5. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions • Outline • Introduction • What is the Agricultural-Population Linkage database? • The Canadian Agriculture-Population Linkage database is a unique database that assembles: • the characteristics of the agricultural holding (from the Census of Agriculture questionnaire); and • the characteristics of each member of the household of each operator of an agricultural holding (from the Census of Population questionnaire).

  6. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions • Outline • Introduction • What is the Agricultural-Population Linkage database? • 1: Understanding household earnings: patterns and change over time • The way farm earnings are received by household members

  7. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  8. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  9. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  10. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions • Summary • During the 1990s, 20% of the earnings of all census-farm operator households (CFOH) were received as unincorporated net farm income. • CFOH members may receive agric. earnings as wages or dividends. • During the 1990s, estimated “agric. labour and capital earnings” was about 30% of total household earnings. • This is most important for CFOH associated with larger ag. holdings.

  11. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions • Outline • Introduction • What is the Agricultural-Population Linkage database? • 1: Understanding household earnings: patterns and change over time • The way farm earnings are received by household members • Structure of agricultural holdings by business size

  12. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  13. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  14. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  15. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  16. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions • Summary • During the 1990s, 20% of the earnings of all census-farm operator households (CFOH) were received as unincorporated net farm income. • CFOH members may receive agric. earnings as wages or dividends. • During the 1990s, estimated “agric. labour and capital earnings” was about 30% of total household earnings. • This is most important for CFOH associated with larger ag. holdings. • The distrib. of agric. holdings, according to the capacity to provide a net farm inc. above the low inc. cut-off, has not changed – suggesting little change in the demand for CFOH to find other sources of earnings. • Est. agric. labour and capital earnings, as a % of total hshld. earnings, has declined for CFOH associated with each size of agric. holding.

  17. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions • Outline • Introduction • What is the Agricultural-Population Linkage database? • 1: Understanding household earnings: patterns and change over time • The way farm earnings are received by household members • Structure of agricultural holdings by business size • Increasing labour force participation rates by women

  18. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  19. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions • Outline • Introduction • What is the Agricultural-Population Linkage database? • 1: Understanding household earnings: patterns and change over time • The way farm earnings are received by household members • Structure of agricultural holdings by business size • Increasing labour force participation rates by women • Regional patterns

  20. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  21. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  22. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  23. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  24. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions • Outline • Introduction • What is the Agricultural-Population Linkage database? • 1: Understanding household earnings: patterns and change over time • The way farm earnings are received by household members • Structure of agricultural holdings by business size • Increasing labour force participation rates by women • Regional patterns • 2: Typology of farmers versus a typology of farms

  25. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  26. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  27. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions • Summary • During the 1990s, 20% of the earnings of all census-farm operator households (CFOH) were received as unincorporated net farm income. • CFOH members may receive agric. earnings as wages or dividends. • During the 1990s, estimated “agric. labour and capital earnings” was about 30% of total household earnings. • This is most important for CFOH associated with larger ag. holdings. • The distrib. of agric. holdings, according to the capacity to provide a net farm inc. above the low inc. cut-off, has not changed – suggesting little change in the demand for CFOH to find other sources of earnings. • Est. agric. labour and capital earnings, as a % of total hshld. earnings, has declined for CFOH associated with each size of agric. holding. • A typology of “farmers” cross-tab. with a typology of “farms” shows no one-to-one mapping of operators as “farmers” and holdings as “farms.”

  28. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions • Outline • Introduction • What is the Agricultural-Population Linkage database? • 1: Understanding household earnings: patterns and change over time • The way farm earnings are received by household members • Structure of agricultural holdings by business size • Increasing labour force participation rates by women • Regional patterns • 2: Typology of farmers versus a typology of farms • 3: Labour supply generated by census-farm operator households

  29. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  30. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  31. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  32. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  33. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  34. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  35. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions • Outline • Introduction • What is the Agricultural-Population Linkage database? • 1: Understanding household earnings: patterns and change over time • The way farm earnings are received by household members • Structure of agricultural holdings by business size • Increasing labour force participation rates by women • Regional patterns • 2: Typology of farmers versus a typology of farms • 3: Labour supply generated by census-farm operator households • 4: Typology of households by farm<>non-farm work patterns

  36. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  37. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  38. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  39. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  40. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  41. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  42. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions • Summary • During the 1990s, 20% of the earnings of all census-farm operator households (CFOH) were received as unincorporated net farm income. • CFOH members may receive agric. earnings as wages or dividends. • During the 1990s, estimated “agric. labour and capital earnings” was about 30% of total household earnings. • This is most important for CFOH associated with larger ag. holdings. • The distrib. of agric. holdings, according to the capacity to provide a net farm inc. above the low inc. cut-off, has not changed – suggesting little change in the demand for CFOH to find other sources of earnings. • Est. agric. labour and capital earnings, as a % of total hshld. earnings, has declined for CFOH associated with each size of agric. holding. • A typology of “farmers” cross-tab. with a typology of “farms” shows no one-to-one mapping of operators as “farmers” and holdings as “farms.” • Within CFOH, more women are “measured” in the labour force and most are working in non-farm occupations. • Males in CFOH shifted (a bit) from a farm to a non-farm occupation.

  43. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions • Outline • Introduction • What is the Agricultural-Population Linkage database? • 1: Understanding household earnings: patterns and change over time • The way farm earnings are received by household members • Structure of agricultural holdings by business size • Increasing labour force participation rates by women • Regional patterns • 2: Typology of farmers versus a typology of farms • 3: Labour supply generated by census-farm operator households • 4: Typology of households by farm<>non-farm work patterns • 5: Do young(er) operators have agricultural-related post- secondary education?

  44. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  45. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions

  46. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions • Outline • Introduction • What is the Agricultural-Population Linkage database? • 1: Understanding household earnings: patterns and change over time • The way farm earnings are received by household members • Structure of agricultural holdings by business size • Increasing labour force participation rates by women • Regional patterns • 2: Typology of farmers versus a typology of farms • 3: Labour supply generated by census-farm operator households • 4: Typology of households by farm<>non-farm work patterns • 5: Do young(er) operators have agricultural-related post- secondary education? • 6. Summary

  47. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions • Summary • During the 1990s, 20% of the earnings of all census-farm operator households (CFOH) were received as unincorporated net farm income. • CFOH members may receive agric. earnings as wages or dividends. • During the 1990s, estimated “agric. labour and capital earnings” was about 30% of total household earnings. • This is most important for CFOH associated with larger ag. holdings. • The distrib. of agric. holdings, according to the capacity to provide a net farm inc. above the low inc. cut-off, has not changed – suggesting little change in the demand for CFOH to find other sources of earnings. • Est. agric. labour and capital earnings, as a % of total hshld. earnings, has declined for CFOH associated with each size of agric. holding. • A typology of “farmers” cross-tab. with a typology of “farms” shows no one-to-one mapping of operators as “farmers” and holdings as “farms.” • Within CFOH, more women are “measured” in the labour force and most are working in non-farm occupations. • Males in CFOH shifted (a bit) from a farm to a non-farm occupation. • Institutions providing agric.-related post-sec. educ. have reached 15% to 42% (depending upon the prov.) of the younger operators of “viable” farms.

  48. Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions Households associated with agricultural holdings: Socio-economic dimensions Presentation to the Second Meeting of the WYE CITY GROUP ON STATISTICS ON RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND AGRICULTURE HOUSEHOLD INCOME June 11 – 12, 2009 Rome, Italy Ray D. Bollman Statistics Canada Questions / Discussion

More Related