SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

Enhancing EU Funds Management: Strategic Report on Progress and Indicator Evaluation

nairi avatar
nairi
12 diapositives · 270 Views · Aug 14, 2014

This strategic report outlines the progress made in preparing and managing EU funds, focusing on the evaluation of impact indicators. It discusses the limitations of existing macroeconomic indicators in reflecting the broader effects of funded programs and proposes new guidelines for designing relevant indicators. Key milestones include a survey of institutions, evaluation working group meetings, and the submission of proposals for updated indicators from various ministries. The report aims to ensure a comprehensive assessment of the impacts of EU funds on economic stabilization and development.

#enhancing eu funds management: strategic report on progress and indicator evaluation #enhancing eu funds management: strategic report on progress and indicator evaluation ppt #powerpoint #presentation
Enhancing EU Funds Management: Strategic Report on Progress and Indicator Evaluation - slide 1
01 / 12Enhancing EU Funds Management: Strategic Report on Progress and Indicator Evaluation
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing EU Funds Management: Strategic Report on Progress and Indicator Evaluation
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. Strategic report. Progres Edite Evere Strategic Planning DivisionEU Funds Strategy Department

  2. Strategic reportProgress made in preparation and time frame • Member State • Council 2006-07-11 Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006Article 29.2. and 29.3. • EC • Council 2006-07-11 Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006Article 30.2. and 30.3 • Experience in the framework of Cohesion policy occurring for the first time

  3. Strategic reportProgress made in preparation and time frame • 2009-09-01: Information inquiry sent to institutions involved in EU Funds management • 2009-09-18: Information received in the Managing Authority, structure of the report developed • 2009-10-28: Evaluation workinggroup meeting (indicators) • 2009-11-17: Informationreview, clarification, drafting of the report, meetings • 2009-11-17: MC written procedure • 2009-12-18: Sending the report to the EC

  4. Strategic report. Indicators Imants Tiesnieks EU Funds Strategy Department

  5. Reasons for a review of indicators • The indicators usedin the programmes donot fully demonstrate the impact of funds in a broader sense. • The current targets of the macroeconomic and impact indicators are not achievable/valid • Requests to demonstrate the efforts for the economic stabilisation • Ensuring a link between strategic objectives and the result indicators • Transposition of the EC Core indicators: commentary of by the EC on the recent developments of SFC (to be discussed when possible)

  6. Broader impact of funds needs to be presented Definition – impact indicators refer to the consequences of the programme beyond the immediate effects. In the programmes at present: • Only selected priorities/measures have impact indicators For example, education, entrepreneurship, transport, environment • More quantitative impact is demonstrated, less quality change For example, number of Phd’s is mentioned, not their competitiveness On transport priority, the impact could be also represented by the number of traffic accidents • It is possible also to interpret the current indicators broader

  7. 2. Macroeconomic indicators and the economic crisis • Macroeconomic indicators: • GDP and employment forecasts are outdated • The limits of the use of Macroeconomic indicators • Significant structural transformations of the economy and uncertainty about the development of the baseline forecasts • Macroeconomic forecasting is based on broad economic categories and larger sectors, not taking into account the content of the programmes

  8. Proposals on additional indicators • The elaboration of impact indicators: 1.1. Ministries to design 1-3 indicators for each sector, according to: • Financial relevance: Indicators are chosen primarily according to the financial size of the programmes • Thematic relevance: a) Providing better coverage of measures b) Including indicators for innovative measures, pilot projects and indicators for decision taking 1.2. Type of indicators: both quantitative and qualitative change is important when aiming at objective, i.e.,various analytical comparisons

  9. Design of impact indicators by sector

  10. Proposals on additional indicators 2. Macroeconomic indicators: – MoFwill prepare a proposal on update of macroeconomic indicators

  11. Timeframe 1.Ministries are submitting indicators to the Ministry of Finance (Imants.Tiesnieks@fm.gov.lv) until October 23, 2009 2. Discussions and agreement on the list of indicators on October 28, 2009 3. Indicators are included in the Strategic Report

  12. Guidelines on the use of indicators • DG Regional policy, Indicative Guidelines on Evaluation Methods: Monitoring and Evaluation Indicators, Working Doc.No.2, 2006 • Evalsed manual http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/evalsed/guide/methods_techniques/indicators/index_en.htm