1 / 11

The Path to Prosperity: Leadership and Resource Management in Post-Independence Americas

This analysis examines how a nation’s prosperity relies on its leadership's capacity to identify resources, set priorities, and implement effective strategies in the Americas post-independence. Key themes include the impact of political and economic systems, the significance of federalism versus regionalism, the effects of diplomacy and demographics, and the necessity of adaptive ideologies. The success and failures of various countries, such as the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, illustrate the profound influence of leadership decisions on national development and collective wellbeing.

napua
Télécharger la présentation

The Path to Prosperity: Leadership and Resource Management in Post-Independence Americas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Americas After Independence Wood 17 A nation’s ability to prosper depends on its leaders’ ability to recognize resources, identify priorities, and make effective progress.

  2. Top Ten Facts to Support the Thesis • Political & economic capitalism lead to prosperity • expansion • isolationism • immigration • type of government matters federalism / strong central government regionalism

  3. Top Ten Facts to Support the Thesis • How leaders respond to regional differences leads to success or failure, union or division • North v. South (civil war) in the US • increased home rule in Canada • fragmentation of Gran Colombia (Ven, Col, Ecu) • Central America pulled away from Mexico

  4. Top Ten Facts to Support the Thesis • Keep the cycle of innovation going war productivity wealth relocation/improved living conditions mechanization exports …

  5. Top Ten Facts to Support the Thesis • Know when to engage in diplomacy - US: isolation, then US/Eur*/Canada relations - cultural influence can lead to political alliance - which led to two nations that ‘spoke the same language’ Romanticism Darwin / Darwinism Freud / modern psychology - Mexico? - Other Latin American states?

  6. Top Ten Facts to Support the Thesis • Pay attention to demographics who’s the elite? who are the worker class? do the ppl – mixed as they are – participate in policymaking? can the people – mixed as they are –self-rule?

  7. Top Ten Facts to Support the Thesis • Theory isn’t practice can you apply current ideology? can you experiment with ideas…and recover?

  8. Top Ten Facts to Support the Thesis • Establish a political institution who has authority and how can they assure the peaceful transfer of power? GW & Juan Manual de Rosas: both charismatic and republican only GW succeeded (why?) Juarez & Diaz: how successful, and why?

  9. Top Ten Facts to Support the Thesis • The role of a belief system – and its church – matters • US: no state religion • GB: state religion • Canada: no state religion • Latin America: Catholic Church Juarez viewed Ch as obstacle (“Land & liberty”) same slogan as French Rev’n – why did Juarez fail?

  10. Top Ten Facts to Support the Thesis • Don’t get left behind: Meet economic demands and you can participate in the global economy Portugal: couldn’t Spain: couldn’t US: could GB: could Mexico / Diaz: could

  11. Top Ten Facts to Support the Thesis • Bring the country with you regularly assess who benefits, who loses will the losers become a liability? Mexico: Diaz & foreign investors…oh no! US: slaves, immigrants, women…free’m = $ dev’t Americas: slaves’ freedom yields $ dev’t Cuba: ready for independence, but US wasn’t US ready for canal, but Colombia wasn’t

More Related