1 / 5

Progress Report on Data Format Questionnaire Responses for WGISS 2005 Meeting

This document outlines the outcomes of the Data Format Questionnaire distributed to agencies during the WGISS meeting held in Kyiv, Ukraine, from September 12–16, 2005. It details responses concerning various data formats used, including attributes like format short name, long name, authority, date, version, usage for archives, and missions. The report also highlights user communities, advantages and disadvantages of different formats, and available software tools. Agencies like USGS, JAXA, NOAA/NCDC, ESA, and CNES provided feedback to enhance data interoperability.

nasnan
Télécharger la présentation

Progress Report on Data Format Questionnaire Responses for WGISS 2005 Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Archive Task Team (ATT) DATA FORMAT Progress Stuart Doescher, USGS WGISS – 20 September 12 – 16, 2005 Kyiv, Ukraine

  2. Actual Action #19-10 • Agencies reply to the Data Format Questionnaire and send results to the ATT. • Email was sent to all@wgiss.ceos.org with cc to archive@wgiss.ceos.org with updated spread sheet.

  3. Attribution • Format Short Name • Format Long Name • Format Authority • Format Date/Version • Format used for (Archive, Product) • Format used for what mission(s)/Sensor(s) • URL or Document Format Citation • Advantages/Disadvantages of format • Replacement Format Reference • User Community • Capable Software Tools

  4. Agency replies • USGS NDF, Fast L7, Fast B, Fast C, HDF-EOS, TIFF, GeoTIFF, FRED, LACS Formatted, LACS, Raw, MSS-X • JAXA HDF, Native Binary, FAST, GeoTIFF, CEOS, CAP • NOAA/NCDC Mode A, Mode AA, Mode AAA, GVAR, Level 1B, HDF5 • ESA MDPS, ERS, ENVISAT, Earth Explorer, CEOS, SeaSHARK, SAFE • CNES GERALD

  5. Next Step • Post spread sheet at WGISS archive web site wgiss.ceos.org/archive • Provide opportunity for comments, corrections and additions.

More Related