1 / 4

TREE FRUITS

TREE FRUITS. Brennan and Majority attempting to save proviso from being declared unconstitutional (see Black dissent) Places proviso within the framework of Section 8(b)(4), within which it is contained

nelson
Télécharger la présentation

TREE FRUITS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TREE FRUITS • Brennan and Majority attempting to save proviso from being declared unconstitutional (see Black dissent) • Places proviso within the framework of Section 8(b)(4), within which it is contained • Unless it can be shown that consumer picketing aimed at struck product meets prohibited conduct & objects test, not unlawful • Consumer picketing does not • does not come within 8(b)(4)( i ) as no person encouraged to stop working • does not come within 8(b)(4)(ii) as does not restrain or coerce neutral

  2. 8(b)(4) Box Prohibited Means/Conduct & Prohibited Object Escape Hatch Nonpicketing to persuade customers CONSUMER PICKETING AIMED ONLY not to buy AT STRUCK GOODS at neutral

  3. BUSH: . . . The voters will know I'll put competent judges on the bench, people who will strictly interpret the Constitution and will not use the bench to write social policy. . . . I believe that . . . the judges ought not to take the place of the legislative branch of government, that they're appointed for life and that they ought to look at the Constitution as sacred. They shouldn't misuse their bench. I don't believe in liberal, activist judges. I believe in . . . strict constructionists. And those are the kind of judges I will appoint. GORE: . . .I know that there are ways to assess how a potential justice interprets the Constitution. And, in my view, the Constitution ought to be interpreted as a document that grows with our country and our history. Judicial Philosophy SOURCE: Transcript of Presidential Debate, Boston, Mass., October 3, 2000, from http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2000/debates/transcripts/ u221003.html

More Related