1 / 10

Acoustic localization for real-life wireless sensor network applications

Acoustic localization for real-life wireless sensor network applications. Michael Allen Cogent Computing ARC. in collaboration with: Centre for Embedded Networked Sensing, UCLA WaveScope project, CSAIL, MIT. Wireless networked sensing.

nen
Télécharger la présentation

Acoustic localization for real-life wireless sensor network applications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Acoustic localization for real-life wireless sensor network applications Michael Allen Cogent Computing ARC in collaboration with: Centre for Embedded Networked Sensing, UCLA WaveScope project, CSAIL, MIT

  2. Wireless networked sensing • Wirelessly networked, embedded, battery powered, sensor enabled computers • Sample and process data about a physical phenomena • Temperature, light, sound, image • Aims/advantages • Cheap, pervasive, collaborative • Distributed computation

  3. My Research • Physical phenomena is sound - Acoustic localization: • For self/node-localization (locate nodes using acoustics) • For source localization (locate acoustic event of interest) • Real-life aspect • Real problems/questions, real environments • Systems research (reliability, robust behaviour) • Field-usable tools • Theoretical aspect • Design principles, algorithms • Scalability • Data fusion

  4. Motivating applications • Primary motivation: bioacoustics • Acoustic source localization of animals/bird calls • Position estimation is helpful for behaviour analysis • Problems • Exploratory systems development is often required • Currently available platforms are not suited to this

  5. Current work - VoxNet • An Interactive platform for bioacoustics research • Hardware and software • Forms real-life, systems aspect of thesis research • Allow on-line and off-line operation • React to events in-field • Full data set gathered at node • Network consists of x nodes and 1 sink • Sink is endpoint for programs • Nodes talk over multi-hop IP to sink Sink/control

  6. V2 (2007) Hardware – Acoustic ENSBox • More capable than current WSN research platforms: • 32-bit ARM CPU, 64MB RAM • Four channel 48KHz audio • wi-fi/802.11b • internal battery (5-10hr) • Rapidly deployable: • Attended, short-lived deployments • Self-localization and time synchronisation: • cm accuracy acoustic based localization (up to 100m range) • 10us time synchronisation across network L. Girod, M. Lukac, V. Trifa, and D. Estrin. "The Design and Implementation of a Self-calibrating Acoustic Sensing Platform." in Proc. of SenSys 2006

  7. Deployment in Colorado • Acoustic localization application running on platform • In-situ, on-line operation (detecting marmots) • Nodes run adaptive event detectors • Signal energy in frequency bands of interest • On detection, data is passed to sink (4 channels/node) • Sink clusters together related events • Makes DoA estimates based on each node’s detection • Estimates position from crossing of DoAs Allen, M., Girod, L., Newton, R., Madden, S., Blumstein, D., Estrin, D., “VoxNet: An Interactive, Rapidly-Deployable Acoustic Monitoring Platform”, International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2008)

  8. Problems/Observations • Latency problems • Uncoordinated, interfering network traffic • Event grouping at sink • Grouped by arrival time – BAD • Events arrive out of order, late • Overall position estimate took far too long • Link quality • Multi-hop data transfer latency

  9. Improvements • On-line clustering algorithm • Group events based on detection time • Smart event grouping • Nodes only send notification of detection • Sink requests data • Adaptive behaviour trade-off • Nodes monitor network links • Decide to process locally or pass raw data

  10. Future work • Scalability of acoustic localization networks • Coverage, density – they make sense? • Bounds on performance • Data fusion for position estimate • Quickest way to get data and fuse it • Information theory/Bayesian approaches to data fusion

More Related