130 likes | 338 Vues
The Evolving Standard of Care in Gastric Cancer Josep Tabernero, MD Head of the Gastrointestinal Tumors and Phase I Program Medical Oncology Department Vall d'Hebron University Hospital Barcelona, Spain. Gastric Cancer: A Prevalent Disease.
E N D
The Evolving Standard of Care in Gastric Cancer Josep Tabernero, MD Head of the Gastrointestinal Tumors and Phase I ProgramMedical Oncology DepartmentValld'Hebron University HospitalBarcelona, Spain
Gastric Cancer: A Prevalent Disease Worldwide: 934,000 new cases and 700,000 deaths /year 5-year survival rate 20% Gastric cancer incidence 20 / 100,000 10 to 20 / 100,000 < 10 / 100,000 Parkin DM et al. CA Cancer J Clin .2005;55:74–108.Yang L. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12;17–20.www.cancer.gov
Superior Overall Survival With Capecitabine:ML17032/REAL-2 Meta-Analysis 1.0 ITT population 0.8 Capecitabine (n = 654) 5-FU (n = 664) 0.6 Estimated probability HR = 0.87 (95% CI: 0.77–0.98) P = .027 0.4 0.2 9.4 10.6 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years 5-FU = 5-fluorouracil; ITT = intent-to-treat Okines AF et al. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1529-1534.
Progress in Advanced Gastric Cancer: Overall Survival With Capecitabine-Based Regimens BSC1 FAMTX2 CF3 IF4 ECF5 EOF5 DCF3 XP6 ECX5 EOX5 Months 1. Murad AM et al. Cancer. 1993;72:37-41. 2. Vanhoefer U et al. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2648-2657. 3. Van Cutsem E et al. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4991-4997 4. Dank M et al. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23[Suppl 16S]:4003. 5. Cunningham et al. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:36-46. 6. Kang Y et al. J Clin Oncol . 2006;22[Suppl 18S]:LBA4018.
HER2-Positivity Rate in Advanced Gastric Cancer ToGA population Exploratory analysis EMA licensed population (IHC 2+/FISH+ or IHC 3+) Eligible for ToGA (IHC 3+ and/orFISH+) 16% 22% IHC 0/FISH+ or IHC 1+/FISH+ 6% 78% 78% Not eligible for ToGA Not eligible for ToGA AGC = advanced gastric cancer; FISH = fluorescence in situ hybridization; HER2 = human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IHC = immunohistochemistry Chung H et al. Eur J Cancer Suppl. 2009;7:364.
ToGA: Trastuzumab + XP/FP Improves OS vs XP/FP Alone 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 Probability 0.4 0.3 0.2 11.1 13.8 0.1 0.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 Time (mo) No. at risk 294 290 277 266 246 223 209 185 173 143 147 117 113 90 90 64 71 47 56 32 43 24 30 16 21 14 13 7 12 6 6 5 4 0 1 0 0 0 CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; OS = overall survival; XP/FP = capecitabine/5-FU + cisplatin Van Cutsem E et al. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27[Suppl 15S]:Abstract 4509.
ToGA: OS in IHC 2+/FISH+ and IHC 3+ Subgroup (Exploratory Analysis) 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 Probability 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 11.8 16.0 0.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 Time (mo) No. at risk 228 218 218 198 170 141 142 112 12296 100 75 84 53 65 39 51 28 39 20 28 13 20 11 12 4 11 3 5 3 4 0 1 0 0 0 196 170 Van Cutsem E et al. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27[Suppl 15S]:Abstract 4509.
AVAGAST: Overall Survival XP + Placebo XP + Bevacizumab 1.0 HR = 0.87 95% CI 0.73–1.03 P = .1002 0.9 0.8 0.7 12.1 0.6 Survival rate 10.1 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 12 0 15 18 21 24 3 9 6 Study month Number at risk 54 50 0 0 XP + Placebo XP + Bev 387 387 343 355 271 291 204 232 146 178 98 104 15 19 Kang Y et al. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28[18Suppl]:Abstract LBA4007.
AVAGAST: PFS and ORR 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 XP + Placebo XP + Bevacizumab 6.7 Survival rate 5.3 HR = 0.80 95% CI 0.68–0.93 P= .0037 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Study month PFS = progression-free survival; ORR = overall response rate Kang Y et al. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28[18Suppl]:Abstract LBA4007.
AVAGAST: Regional Differences in Efficacy Kang Y et al. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28[18Suppl]:Abstract LBA4007.
Conclusions • Advanced gastric cancer continues to be an important malignant disease • With capecitabine-based chemotherapy, patients with advanced gastric cancer have attained a mean OS of 10-11 months • Patients with HER-2 IHC 2+/FISH+ or IHC 3+ disease clearly benefit from addition of trastuzumab to standard chemotherapy • Some patients with advanced gastric cancer benefit from addition of antiangiogenic therapy to standard chemotherapy