260 likes | 405 Vues
This outline examines the characteristics of party realignment in the U.S., highlighting key historical shifts, such as those during and after the Civil War, the Great Depression, and recent trends in Southern voter alignment. It also discusses the role of political parties as linkage institutions connecting citizens to government, the impact of electoral systems that favor two major parties, and the dynamics of party coalitions across various issues. Additionally, the weakening of traditional party structures and the rise of candidate-centered politics are analyzed, emphasizing the evolving nature of American political engagement.
E N D
Outline: • Characteristics of Party Realignment • Role of the Parties • Electoral Systems • Coalitions • Third Parties • Party Organizations
Characteristics of Realignment Post Civil War, there has been consistent competition between Dems and Repubs Realignment occurs when the parties adapt during crises: • Powerful and divisive issue (War, Economy) • Elections with huge shifts in voter support • A major change in policy by dominant party • Enduring change in the party coalitions
Three critical realignments: • The Civil War Realignment • Repubs dominate • Dems blamed for war, but they had the “Solid South” • 1896 Realignment • Economic panic, blamed on Dem Cleveland • Strengthened Repubs • Great Depression Realignment • Crash blamed on Hoover • Dems reign for next 36 years; interrupted only by IKE in the 50s
Recent realignment (ish) Southern shift from solid Dem to solid Repub • Civil Rights Act, Vietnam War, New Deal politics ending • Splinters the Dems, Repubs revitalize Southern voters • Not as abrupt as the other three
Party Roles • Linkage institutions • Connect citizens to government • Gives popular majorities a choice over how they will be governed • Strongest indicator of how someone will vote • Gain power by winning elections
Electoral Systems: Why only two parties? • An exception for democracies around the world • Tradition • Single Member Districts • Elect a single member to each district (candidate with most votes wins) • Contrast to a proportional system • Play to the middle • Median voter theorem
Platforms Dems Repubs Abortion: Pro-Life Civil Rights: Traditional definition of marriage Education: Promote school choice Healthcare: individuals manage their needs Immigration: Fence Taxes: Cuts for all • Abortion: Choice • Civil Rights: No gay marriage ban • Education: Hire more teachers • Healthcare: Affordable healthcare for all • Immigration: Pathway • Taxes: Cuts for working families, not rich 1%
Third Parties • Reform • Progressives • Reform • Single Issue • Free Soil • Greenback • Prohibition • Populists • Ideological • Libertarian • Tea • Green
Mitt Romney Former Massachusetts Governor
Mike Huckabee Former Arkansas Governor
Sarah Palin Former Alaska Governor
Tim Pawlenty Former Minnesota Governor
SNL • http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/mitt-romney-chris-christie-cold-opening/1361090 • http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/gop-debate-3-cold-open/1368128
Party orgs weaken over time: • Nomination (Party to Candidate) • Progressives (Reform in response to corruption) • Primaries (Party choice to voter choice) • Money (Party generated to candidate generated) • Jobs (Patronage to merit system)
Changes in the Nominating Process (McGovern-Fraser Reforms) Until 1968 • Party Dominated • Few Primaries • Short Campaigns • Easy Money • Limited Media Coverage • Late Decisions • Open Conventions After 1968 • Candidate Dominated • Many Primaries • Long Campaigns • Difficult Fundraising • Media Focused • “Front-Loaded” • Closed Conventions