1 / 67

The Fermilab Control System

The Fermilab Control System. Jim Patrick - Fermilab CERN AB Seminar October 5, 2006. Outline. Accelerator Complex Overview Control System Overview Selected Control System Features Migration Efforts Summary. Main Injector. pbar. Linac. Booster. Tevatron. Fermilab Accelerator Complex.

nitza
Télécharger la présentation

The Fermilab Control System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Fermilab Control System Jim Patrick - Fermilab CERN AB Seminar October 5, 2006

  2. Outline • Accelerator Complex Overview • Control System Overview • Selected Control System Features • Migration Efforts • Summary Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  3. Main Injector pbar Linac Booster Tevatron Fermilab Accelerator Complex NUMI Fixed Target miniBooNE Recycler e-cool J. Patrick September 19, 2006

  4. Fermilab Accelerator Complex • 400 MeV Linac (up to 15 Hz) • 8 GeV Booster Synchrotron (up to 15 Hz) • 120 GeV Main Injector Synchrotron (~0.5 Hz) • 980 GeV Tevatron Superconducting Synchrotron/Storage Ring • 8 GeV Debuncher/Accumulator for antiproton production • 8 GeV “Recycler” for antiproton accumulation (same tunnel as MI) with electron cooling Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  5. Operating Modes • 1.96 TeV proton-antiproton collider (24-30 hour stores) • 8 GeV fixed target from booster (miniBooNE) - ~5 Hz • 120 GeV fixed target from Main Injector - ~1/minute • 120 GeV fixed target for NUMI (~0.5 Hz) • 120 GeV from MI for pbar production (0.25 – 0.5 Hz) • Cycles interleaved • Main Injector load contains batches for both NUMI and pbar Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  6. The Run II Challenge • Operate the Tevatron collider at > 10 x the luminosity of the previous (1992-6) run (began Mar 2001) • Collider stores + pbar production • Incorporate Recycler ring (May 2004) • With Electron cooling (July 2005) • Operate miniBooNE - (Dec 2001) • Operate 120 GeV fixed target (Feb 2003) • Operate NUMI high intensity neutrino beam (Dec 2004) • Get all this working, all at the same time • Meanwhile modernize the control system without affecting commissioning and operation of the above • Simultaneous collider and fixed target operation new to Fermilab Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  7. Outline • Accelerator Complex Overview • Control System Overview • Selected Features • Migration Efforts • Summary Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  8. Control System Overview • Known as “ACNET” • Unified control system for the entire complex • All accelerators, all machine and technical equipment • Common console manager can launch any application • Common software frameworks • Common timing system • Three-tier system • Applications • Services • Front-ends • Distributed intelligence • Enabled by front-ends, special hardware • System is tolerant to high level software disruptions Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  9. Control System Overview Console Applications Java Applications Web Applications Database Application 70+70+ CentralServices Servlets Open Access Clients Consolidators Central 120 ethernet MOOC Front-Ends Labview Front-Ends IRM Front-Ends Front-End field bus: VME, SLD, Arcnet, ethernet, … >500 Field Hardware CAMAC, VME, PMC, IP, Multibus, CIA, GPIB, … Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  10. ACNET History • Originally developed for Tevatron in early 80’s • Substantial evolution over the years • CAMAC field hardware -> very broad diversity • Major modernization in the 90’s • PDP-11/Mac-16 front-ends -> x86 Multibus -> PPC VME • DEC PCL network-> IEEE 802.5 token ring -> ethernet • VAX database -> Sybase • PDP-11 applications -> VAXstations • VAX only through 2000 • Java framework, port to Linux since then Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  11. Device Model • Maximum 8 character device names • e.g. T:BEAM for Tevatron beam intensity • Informal conventions provide some rationality • More verbose hierarchy layer created, but not utilized/maintained • Each device has one or more of a fixed set of properties: • Reading, setting, analog & digital alarms, digital status & control • Device descriptions stored in central Sybase database • Monotype data, arrays are transparently supported • Mixed type structures done, but support not transparent • Application (library) layer must properly interpret the data from the front-end and perform required data translations • ~200,000 devices/350,000 properties in the system Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  12. ACNET Protocol • Custom protocol used for intra-node communication • Layered, task directed protocol developed in early 80’s • Old, but ahead of its time • Currently uses UDP over ethernet • Timeout/retry mitigates UDP unreliability • Very little packet loss in our network • Get/Set devices • Single or repetitive reply; immediate, periodic, or on clock event • Multiple requests in single network packet • Fast Time Plot (FTP) • Blocks of readings taken at up to 1440 Hz returned every 0.5 sec. • Snapshot • Block of 2048 readings taken at an arbitrary rate Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  13. ACNET Protocol • Has proven to be very reliable, robust, scalable and extensible protocol for many years • For example, new GET/SET protocol adds precise time stamps, collection on event+delay, states, larger device address space • Main weakness is lack of transparent mixed type support • But this is often done manually • Difficult to program, but high level API hides details • Difficult to port to new platforms but has been done Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  14. Timing and Control Networks • TCLK (Clock Events) • Trigger various actions in the complex • Dedicated 10 MHz serial network • 256 possible events defined for the complex • Includes 1 Hz GPS time sync • MDAT (Machine Data) • General mechanism for rapid data transfer • 36 slots updated at 720 Hz • Beam Sync – revolution markers derived from RF • States – discussed later • Both TCLK and MDAT are multicast at 15 Hz for central layer processes that don’t require hard real-time response Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  15. Application Environment • Console environment • VAX based; Now mostly ported to Linux • Integrated application/graphics/data access architecture • C language (+ legacy FORTRAN) • Java environment • Platform independent; Windows/Sun/Linux/Mac all utilized • Full access to entire control system • Both environments have a standard application framework that provides a common look and feel • All applications launched from “Index Pages” • Separate for Console, Java environments • Tightly managed code in both environments • Also some web browser applications of varying styles Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  16. Index Page Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  17. Parameter Page Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  18. Device Database GUI Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  19. Synoptic Display (Web) • Drag&Drop Builder • Uses AJAX technology Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  20. Alarms Front-ends post (push) alarms to central server for distributionand display Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  21. Central Layer • Database • Open Access Clients (“virtual front-ends”) • Java Servlets • Bridge device requests from outside firewall and for web apps • Request Consolidation • Requests from different clients consolidated to a single request to the front-end • Alarms server • Front-end download • Load last settings on reboot Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  22. Database • Central Sybase database • Three parts: • All device and node descriptions • Application information • Used by applications as they wish • Save/Restore and Shot Data database • MySQL used for data loggers • Data volume too high for Sybase • Not for general application use • Many older programs still use central “file sharing” system Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  23. Open Access Clients (OACs) • “Virtual” front-ends • Obey same ACNET communication protocol as front-ends • Several classes: • Utility – Data loggers, scheduled data acquisition, virtual devices • Consolidate devices across front-ends into single array • Calculations – Both database driven and custom • Process control – Pulse to pulse feedback of fixed target lines • Bridges – to ethernet connected scopes, instrumentation, etc. • Easy access to devices on multiple front-ends • Friendlier programming environment than VxWorks front-ends • Framework transparently handles ACNET communication • Access to database, other high level operating system features • Do not provide hard real-time response; clock events by multicast • > 100; Almost all run in Java framework Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  24. Front-Ends • MOOC – Minimally Object-Oriented Communication • Very wide diversity of functionality • Processors all VME (VXI) based • Very wide diversity of field hardware supported - CAMAC, Multibus, VME, VXI, CIA, ethernet attached instruments, etc. • VxWorks Operating System • ~325 in the system • IRM – Internet Rack Monitor • Turnkey system with 64 channel ADC + DAC + Digital I/O • PSOS operating system • ~125 in the system • Labview – Used for one or few of a kind instrumentation • A front-end to the control system; only experts use Labview GUI Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  25. Outline • Accelerator Complex Overview • Control System Overview • Selected Features • Migration Efforts • Summary Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  26. Sequencer Overview • The Sequencer is an accelerator application which automates the very complex sequence of operations required to operate the collider (and other things) • Operation divided into “Aggregates” for each major step • “Inject Protons”, “Accelerate”, etc. • Aggregates are described in a simple command language • Easily readable, not buried in large monolithic code • Easily modified by machine experts • No need to compile/build etc. • The sequencer program provides an editor to assist writing aggregates • Pick from list of commands • Aggregate descriptions are stored in the database Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  27. Tevatron Collider Operation Initiate Collisions Squeeze HEP Flattop Pause HEP Remove Halo Ramping Proton Removal Acceleration Recovery Before Ramp Unsqueeze Flattop2 Cogging Pbar Injection porch Deceleration Inject Pbars Proton Injection porch Extraction porch Reset Eject Protons Inject Protons Proton Injection tune up Extract Pbars Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  28. Sequencer Overview • Each Aggregate contains a number of commands • Set, get, check devices • Wait for conditions • Execute more complex operations implemented as ACL scripts or specially coded commands • Start regular programs (for example TeV injection closure) • Start plots • Send data to shot log • … • The Sequencer program steps through the commands • Stops on error • Allow operator to restart at failed command • Fermilab sequencer is not a formal finite state machine • It is not just for collider operations • Configure other parts of complex, studies Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  29. Sequencer GUI • Inject Protons Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  30. Sequencer Overview • The Fermilab complex employs “distributed intelligence” • Separate sequencer instances for TeV, MI, pbar, recycler • Lower level programs control complex operations such as collimator movement for scraping • Sequencer just issues high level control commands • Waveforms preloaded to ramp cards, triggered by clock events • “States” concept used to provide synchronization Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  31. States • ACNET devices owned by STATES OAC process • When a state device is set, it is reflected to the rest of the control system by the STATES process • Multicast • Registered listeners • Thus can be used to trigger actions, do synchronization • Condition persists in time unlike clock events • Examples • Collider State • Inject Protons, Inject pbars, Accelerate, HEP, etc. • Collimators – Commands for collimator movement • Go to Init; Remove Halo, Retract for Store • Wire scanner profile calculation complete Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  32. Waveform Generators • Magnets need to do different things at different times in the machine cycle • Rather than redownload on each cycle, custom function generator cards that preload up to 32 waveforms are used • Correct one for a part of the cycle triggered by clock event • Waveforms are functions of time and MDAT frame values • On board processor does smooth interpolation • Thus waveforms need not be downloaded at each phase of the machine cycle • Enhances reliability • Reduced dependence on high level software in stable operation Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  33. Clock events Clock Events and Waveform Generators Example of preloaded hardware triggered by clock events Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  34. Details of a Waveform Generator Clock events Time table Energy table Squeeze table All three tables play simultaneously Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  35. Finite State Machine (Java) • Graphical Drag&Drop Builder • State machine description stored in database • FSM OAC runs machines • Viewer application for control and monitoring • Primary current usage is e-cool Pelletron control • Keeps track of HV sparks and beam related trips • Automates recovery sequence • More formal state machine than sequencer, perhaps less scalable Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  36. SDA • Sequenced Data Acquisition – Shot Data Analysis • Record data at each step in collider operation in dedicated database • Compute and track injection efficiencies, emittance growth, luminosity, … • Variety of tools to extract, analyze data • Web reports created in real time • “Supertable” summary – web page + Excel spreadsheet • Many predefined plots available on the web • SDA Viewer – spreadsheet like Java application • SDA Plotter – plot snapshots and fast time plots • Java Analysis Studio input module • Java API for custom programs Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  37. SDA Reports Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  38. Data Loggers – aka “Lumberjack” • 70 instances running in parallel on individual central nodes • Allocated to departments to use as they wish, no central management. Continual demand for more • ~48,000 distinct devices logged • Rate up to 15 Hz or on clock or state event (+ delay) • 80 GB storage per node in MySQL database • Stored in compressed binary time blocks in the database • Keyed by device, block start time • Circular buffer; wraparound time depends on device count/rates • Data at maximum 1 Hz rate extracted from each logger to “Backup” logger every 24 hours • Currently 850 million points extracted per day • Backup logger is available online => data accessible forever Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  39. Data Loggers • Logger tasks are Open Access Clients • Reads via logger task rather than direct database access • Variety of retrieval tools available • Standard console applications, Console and Java environments • Web applications • Java Analysis Studio • programmatic APIs • Retrieval rates typically ~10-30K points/second Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  40. Data Logger Plots Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  41. Security • Limit access to the control system • Control system network inside a firewall with limited access in/out • Limit setting ability • Privilege classes (roles) defined • Roles assigned to users, services, nodes • Devices tagged with map of which roles may set it • Take logical and of user/service/node/device mask • Allows fine grained control, but in practice • Device masks allow all roles to set; flat device hierarchy tedious… • A limited number of roles are actually used • Applications outside MCR start with settings disabled • Settings must be manually enabled. Times out after some period • Applications started outside MCR exit after some time limit Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  42. Remote Access • Console environment via remote X display • Settings generally not allowed • Java applet version of console • Java apps can be launched from anywhere via Webstart • Access to inner parts of control system only via VPN • Servlets provide read access for some applications • “Secure Controls Framework” – Kerberos authentication for low level communication – allows read access outside firewall • Access from outside standard application environments: • xml-rpc protocol used; bindings to many languages • Readings of any device; setting of select “virtual” devices • No setting of hardware associated devices • Used by all current experiments; both fetch and input data Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  43. Accountability • Considerable usage information is logged • Who/what/where/when • Most reports web accessible • Settings • Errors – reviewed each morning • Database queries • Device reads from Java clients • Application usage • Clock (TCLK) events • State transitions Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  44. Minimize Restarts • Minimize need to restart parts of the system: • Changes to the device or node database are multicast to the control system, they do not need to be restarted to pick these up • For many front-ends devices can be added without a reboot • When something is restarted, minimize what else must be restarted • Restarts set state transition • Monitor (periodic) requests automatically reestablished • Application automatically recovers middle layer restart Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  45. Redirection • The console manager may cause I/O requests to be redirected from the normal hardware.Possibilities alternatives are: • An OAC process • A default “MIRROR” process reflects settings into readings • A Save file • An SDA file • This allows testing basic functionality of some applications without risk • This provides a potentially good framework for integrating accelerator models, but hasn’t been done… Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  46. Some Issues… • Short device names, no hierarchy • Structured device properties not transparent • Old fashioned GUI in console environment • Lack of standard machine configuration description • Lack of integration with models • Lack of integration with Matlab and related tools • Weak inter-front end communication • Specific to Fermilab environment, no attempt at portability Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  47. Outline • Accelerator Complex Overview • Control System Overview • Some Selected Features • Migration Efforts • Summary Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  48. Migration Strategy • By the late 90’s VAXes had been eliminated from Fermilab except in the accelerator control system • Some migration strategy was essential • CDF/D0 run until ~2006-8; BTeV until ~2012+ (since cancelled) • Strategy would have to be incremental • Not possible to replace the entire control system in one shutdown • Should be possible to replace a single application at a time • New and old parts would have to interoperate • Should require no or minimal changes to front-ends • Most of these had been migrated from Multibus/i386/RTOS to VME/PPC/VxWorks in the 90’s • Implied that ACNET protocol would remain primary communication mechanism Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  49. Migration Plan • Architecture developed using the Java language • Multi-tier • Applications • Data Acquisition Engines (middle layer) • Front-ends (unmodified) • Applications divided into thin GUI client with business logic in DAE. Predated J2EE and related ideas • Communication via Java RMI • Drifted back to heavy client, DAE only does device access • Open Access Clients running in DAE (same Java virtual machine) • Device request consolidation across all Java clients Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

  50. Java Migration Progress • Required infrastructure was created prior to 2001 run start • ACNET protocol • DAE framework • OAC framework • Device access library • Database access library • Application framework • Etc. • SDA implemented; continually evolved to meet needs • Data acquisition • Analysis tools • Most VAX OACs converted to Java and new ones written • Java versions of many utility applications written Fermilab Control System - CERN AB Seminar

More Related