1 / 49

Demystifying e-learning

Demystifying e-learning . … or why does Liverpool Hope need an active, integrated elearning dimension?. Karl Donert Director of Development, National Teaching Fellow Liverpool Hope University donertk@hope.ac.uk. Intention of the session. defining and redefining eLearning

niveditha
Télécharger la présentation

Demystifying e-learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Demystifying e-learning … or why does Liverpool Hope need an active, integrated elearning dimension? Karl Donert Director of Development, National Teaching Fellow Liverpool Hope University donertk@hope.ac.uk

  2. Intention of the session • defining and redefining eLearning • what does eLearning means to us • managers, academics, support staff and learners • State of play 2006 • Why must we be involved? • Some visions for the future • Conclusions and questions?

  3. Defining e-learning • different definitions of elearning provide a confusing landscape • Rosenberg (2001) relates to a user-perspective, defining eLearning as the use of technologies • variety of user solutions not limited to traditional education paradigms • HEFCE (2005) - official view, elearning is the use of technologies in learning opportunities, encompassing flexible learning and distance learning Rosenberg MJ (2001). E-learning. Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. New York: McGraw-Hill. HEFCE (2005), HEFCE elearning strategy, http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2005/05_12/

  4. Definitions - technical • eLearning: “Learning facilitated and supported through the use of stand alone and networked information and communications technology (ICT)*” (JISC, 2005) • To “…create, offer, select, manage and deliver distance learning.” (NTI, 2006) JISC (2005), elearning and pedagogy, http://www.jisc.ac.uk/elearning_pedagogy.html NTI (2006), Northeast Technical Institution, http://www.northeasttech.com/elearning.htm

  5. What is it? “eLearning means using new multimedia technologies and the Internet to improve the quality of learning by facilitating access to facilities and services as well as remote exchanges and collaboration.” (European ODL Liaison Committee, 2004) European ODL Liaison Committee, Distance Learning and eLearning in European Policy and Practice: The Vision and the Reality, 17/11/04

  6. Definitions of eLearning “The delivery ofcontent, via all electronic media, including the internet, intranets, extranets, satellite, broadcast, video, interactive TV and CD Rom. ….. e-learning encompasses all learning undertaken, whether formal or informal, through electronic delivery.” (LTSN Subject Centre for Health Sciences and Practice, 2005) LTSN Subject Centre for Health Sciences and Practice (2005), elearning and Widening participation, http://www.health.heacademy.ac.uk/themes/elearning/

  7. Definitions of eLearning “The component of distributed learning that includes digital content, is experienced through a technology interface, and is Internet-enabled. Collaboration is a desirable feature but not a requirement.” (Skillsoft Academic Certification, 2006) Skillsoft (2006), eLearning for the Knowledge Economy at the University of Texas, http://www1.skillsoft.com/partners/academic.cont.edu/uoftexas/uoftexas_index.html

  8. a.b.c,d and even e - learning

  9. What is e-learning? • Courses • Informal learning • Blended learning • Communities • Knowledge management • Networked learning • Work-based learning

  10. What is it? • Web-based learning • Virtual training • Digital teaching materials • Online teaching • On-demand learning • Collaborative (web-based) learning • Digital TV programmes • Computer assisted learning (CAL/CBT etc) Confused?

  11. Redefining eLearning "If someone is learning in a way that uses information and communication technologies (ICT), they are doing eLearning.” DfES, 2005 DfES (2005), The e-strategy: harnessing Technology: transforming learning and chidren’s services, http://www.dfes.gov.uk/publications/e-strategy/

  12. Redefining eLearning “e-learning refers to any type of learning that uses electronic media.” “It means many different things to people but is a popular media buzz word and should be avoided." (Prof Peter John, University of Plymouth, 2005) John P (2005), elearning strategies for transformation, http://www2.plymouth.ac.uk/e-learning/index.htm

  13. Redefining eLearning • e-learning = learning in which ICT is integral to its effectiveness • Not just websites, not only networks • Formal and informal learning • Learning as a creative process: seeing information ≠ learning • Key factor is degree of involvement of learner Donert K (2005), Has Anyone Yet Worked Out What Is So Special with "e"?, eLearning Europa, European Commission Web site, http://82.194.71.130/index.php?page=doc&doc_id=4358&doclng=6

  14. Redefining eLearning • eLearning is really about learning …. with an e- • Focus on learning not on the e- • e- provides an opportunity to make learning special • e- makes learning available for all learners at their own pace • not e-teaching Karl Donert (2003) Donert K (2005), Has Anyone Yet Worked Out What Is So Special with "e"?, eLearning Europa, European Commission Web site, http://82.194.71.130/index.php?page=doc&doc_id=4358&doclng=6

  15. Redefinition: Virtual Learning • eLearning is really ‘Virtual Learning’ • Includes learning in the classroom PLUS • Anytime, Anyplace • Anywhere, Anyhow • Available 24/7, Support 24/7 • Management Opportunities 24/7 • Meeting Individual Needs 24/7 • Helping reach all learners • Enabling difference and diversity

  16. Redefinition: Virtual Learning eLearning is really the transparent use of ICT in a learning situation eLearning encompasses and integrates most other areas of a higher education organisation such as: • Administration and Registration • Content and Resource Delivery • Communications, Monitoring • Assessment, Recording and Reporting • Recruitment and even Alumni and …

  17. Redefinition: Virtual Learning • Significant opportunities for interaction (Zell, 2001) • Development of social skills - cooperative problem solving, teamwork and collaborative activities (Simms, 2000) VL includes the organisation of: • The actions of individuals, their approaches and reflections and • Complex collaborative activity involving interchange within the learning community • High order learning – critical thinking

  18. What does this really means to the University? Accepting the HEFCE definition ….. • eLearning touches on and is facilitated by a huge range of processes • not just the learning interaction • To demystify eLearning, we must assess what it means to: • The Manager? • The Teacher? • The Learner?

  19. What does eLearning mean to a Manager? Although eLearning allows good classroom practice and independent learning opportunities, many of its major benefits happen behind the scenes. Remember, eLearning touches upon and is facilitated by a huge range of processes from registration, support, contact, feedback not merely the learning interaction

  20. What does eLearning mean to a Manager? Some of the issues that eLearning could help overcome: • Monitoring • Student, family, university links • Community and industry links • Remote Subject Specialism • Distance (physical and other) • Change • Special cases and special needs

  21. What does eLearning mean to a Teacher? Effective Learning is the Teachers objective: • What learning experiences should take place? • Analyse audience • Who are the learners? • What are their characteristics? • Needs? Styles? Interactions? • From transmission to transaction • From independent learner to the inter-dependent learner • Analyse context • Best approaches - blended? Synchronous or asynchronous? Integrated with needs? • Analyse content • What information? Which topics? How sequenced? How supported? Holistic, reflective approach to development

  22. What does eLearning mean to a Learner? from the perspective of learners: • Flexibility – the time, place and pace of learning • Responsive teachers – interactive, responsive, available, negotiated response times adhered to • Quality of materials – well designed, interactive, up-to-date, fast to download, easy to read, easy to navigate, good visual design Flexibility Through Online Learning: At a Glance: National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER),South Australia, 2002

  23. eLearning or e-Solution? A Whole University Approach essential to have an e-solution • joined-up approach to the use of ICT (with learners at the centre) • focus on the elements of e-solution • their interactive relationships with one another • for all (learners, academics, managers, others) • must provide an eLearning policy and a coherent plan for its implementation

  24. State of play • powerful currents • affordable technologies • information culture • integral part of UK society today • new kinds of students – different needs • Government strategy - policy Donert K (2005), The state of e-learning in the UK, Report for the European Commission, Brussels, Directorate General Education

  25. State of play - UK Government • strategic objectives to strengthen the competitiveness of the UK HE system • promote strong and efficient elearning systems • funding relates to achieving (national) strategic objectives • Lambert Report (2005) extensive strategy for the future of elearning • HEA main national portal for professional development and support • HEFCE committed to embed e-learning – priority in White Paper (DfES, 2003) DfES (2003), The future of higher education: White Paper, http://www.dfes.gov.uk/hegateway/uploads/White%20Pape.pdfLambert R (2003), Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration: final report, Norwich, HMSO

  26. Who is doing elearning? • Americans, Australians …. • The Open University • Some big and powerful universities • New breed of ICT-savvy people • Large public and private sector companies, corporations and professions • Health Service, Insurance, Banks, Lawyers, Business • EuroDisney University, McDonalds University • Commercial organisations (B&Q, Tesco) • Museums and libraries What about us?

  27. State of play – elearning, 2005 • widespread activity of elearning in education • interactive computer-based approaches • innovation in technology, learning design, and learning pedagogy need to intersect • learning tools increasingly interactive, distributed, and collaborative Donert K (2005), The state of e-learning in the UK, Report for the European Commission, Brussels, Directorate General Education

  28. State of play – elearning, 2005 • Organisations and regions supporting e-learning (e-cities) • large businesses have embraced elearning – banking, insurance, transport • professions also – NHS, lawyers, increasingly education • e-education increasingly with external agencies – companies, public/private sector, lifelong learners, FE, adult education, schools • partnerships and development Donert K (2005), The state of e-learning in the UK, Report for the European Commission, Brussels, Directorate General Education

  29. Why isn’t elearning happening in HE? • commitment and organisational structure • a lack of understanding of elearning impact • willingness and ability to invest (what are the actual benefits – can we cost them?) • competing resources – staff time and rewards (research –vs- teaching in HE) • lack of skills in the area (those that ‘can do’, but what about the rest and what is the motivation for them ‘to do’?)

  30. Why isn’t elearning happening in HE? • Lack of examples of appropriate models for using e-learning to improve campus-based learning • Lack of infrastructure within universities and • Uncertainty (among decision makers) as to the pedagogic effectiveness of e-learning Hence the establishment of a national 10-year strategy

  31. eLearning priorities for higher education • e-learning is what HE students expect today • Ageing HE workforce lacks IT skills and fears technology • Education leaders must drive e-learning forward • Government has a role in funding, standards and quality

  32. White Paper: ‘The future of HE ‘HEFCE will now work with partners on plans to embed eLearning in a full and sustainable way within the next ten years’

  33. HEFCE (2005) elearning strategy Aims to: • help the sector to embed e-learning, making the HE system more student-focused and flexible • enable institutions to meet the needs of learners and their own aspirations for development • support institutions in the strategic planning and change management needed to underpin their development of e-learning • promote learning research and innovation that begins with a focus on student learning rather than on technology • support lifelong learning by joining up HEFCE's strategy with those of other sectors of education. (HEFCE, 2005) HEFCE (2005), eLearning Strategy, http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2005/05_12/

  34. HEFCE strategy: making it happen • Government 10-year elearning strategy to integrate e-learning into higher education has been established to transform the learning experiences of students • NOW: £33 million in capital funding will be available to universities and colleges to support investment in e-learning. • SOON: £8 million - 'pathfinder' projects to embed e-learning in institutions individually or through collaboration, and to provide case studies from end 2006 (http://www.hefce.ac.uk/finance/fundinghe/pfu/pathfind/) • JISC funding for infrastructure and technical development HEFCE (2005), eLearning Strategy, http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2005/05_12/

  35. HEA - approach • HEA helps higher education to use new technology as effectively as it can • becomes a 'normal' or embedded part of activities • institutional support - in their strategies • lead the development of research and evaluation to improve the quality of the student learning experience • subject and staff development, promote good practice, provide quality information, advice and resources • major new initiatives recognise the urgent need for in-depth pedagogical research • through major funding = National Teaching Fellowship projects, next phase of CETLs, other projects

  36. Why do it? • very strong political will • centralised intention to encourage higher education practitioners and institutions to fully integrate elearning into their regular operations • in a national and regional infrastructure • support for those designing, researching or managing the implementation of eLearning in Higher Education • issues of pedagogy, sustainability, curriculum design and quality to be seriously addressed • central to the whole lifelong learning system

  37. Some visions of the future

  38. Visions: Who for? What for? • Who for? • Need to be very clear from start • How is it elearning useful? • And for whom? • What for? • How will it be used? • What are the ‘real-world’ outcomes? • What are the implications?

  39. What can it offer? “the innovative exploitation of Communications and Information Technology (C&IT) holds out much promise for improving the quality, flexibility and effectiveness of higher education.” Dearing, 1997 Dearing R (1997), The Dearing Report: Higher Education in the Learning Society, HMSO

  40. Visions … HEFCE By 2010… “Courses, programs, and supporting services are delivered using appropriate digital technologies and are tailored to individual student needs” HEFCE (2005), eLearning Strategy, http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2005/05_12/

  41. eLearning: European Initiative eEurope 2010 2010 European Higher Education Area

  42. Learning community learner - external Instructor Knowledge TRANSITION base learner learner learner learner learner learner tutor Learning community - internal Classroom workshop experts People Development 21st Century learning A new learning paradigm CISCO 2001

  43. People Development 21st Century learning CISCO 2001

  44. People Development 21st Century learning CISCO 2001

  45. Personalisation and choice Flexibility and independence Opening up services Staff development Collaborative partnerships The aims of our 21st century system… • Personalise teaching and learning • Include the hard to reach groups • Open up a more flexible system • Improve efficiency and effectiveness will need the contributions ICT and e-learning can make, to… Laurillard D (2005), E-learning policy informed by e-learning research,University of Manchester, 30 November

  46. “Fantasyland”Prof John Taylor (2003) • In “fantasyland” universities are typified by the hierarchical, bureaucratic academic structure • the provision of services to students is inhibited by the unavoidable internal focus on compartmentalized thinking, personal agendas, fragmented objectives, overly complex procedures • “Clicks and mortar are not enough!” • Gary Hamel (2001) necessity for “habitual and radical innovation” Taylor JC (2003), Managing on the edge of chaos, http://www.napier.ac.uk/elearning/presentations/taylor.pdf Hamel G (2001), Leading the revolution, Barnes and Noble, New York

  47. Visions for e-Learning e-learning WILL • transform the learning landscape • establish learning communities (Rheingold, 1998) • form communities of practise (Wenger, 1999) eLearning is very suited to our students BUT WE MUST • understand the power and potential • integrate and embed approaches throughout • support and promote e-learning champions and programs • acquire new eLearning-related skills

  48. Visions for e-Learning Visions MUST contain: People: Researching and defining the Target Audiences Product: Clearly defining The Product Place: Where learning takes place? Price: Quantifying the cost and value Promotion: Publicising activities and achievements Barriers: Assessing the resistance to change http://www.e-learningcentre.co.uk/

  49. Conclusions • eLearning not a mystical or unattainable objective • happening already • it happens wherever technology can be used to make a difference • using simple techniques it is an achievable objective • using effective and joined up, integratedapproaches it can be very successful

More Related