1 / 154

CIVIL LIBERTIES

CIVIL LIBERTIES. BILL OF RIGHTS #1-#10 FEDERAL…. STATES(#14) INCORPORATION. 4.KEY CONCEPTS. 1.GUARANTEED. 2.RELATIVE…. NOT ABSOLUTE. 3. APPLY TO ALL. 4.RIGHTS IN CONFLICT… EXAMPLES…. FREE PRESS (1) VS. FAIR TRIAL (6). FREE SPEECH (1) VS. PUBLIC ORDER.

nolan-copeland
Télécharger la présentation

CIVIL LIBERTIES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CIVIL LIBERTIES

  2. BILL OF RIGHTS#1-#10FEDERAL….STATES(#14)INCORPORATION

  3. 4.KEY CONCEPTS

  4. 1.GUARANTEED

  5. 2.RELATIVE….NOT ABSOLUTE

  6. 3. APPLY TO ALL

  7. 4.RIGHTS IN CONFLICT…EXAMPLES…

  8. FREE PRESS (1)VS.FAIR TRIAL (6)

  9. FREE SPEECH (1)VS. PUBLIC ORDER

  10. FREEDOM OF RELIGION (1)VS.NATIONAL SECURITY

  11. CULTURAL CONFLICTS

  12. RELIGIONLANGUAGESEXUAL PREFERENCE hola Hello Bonjour

  13. 1ST AMENDMENT5 PARTS….R-S-P-P-A

  14. SPEECH11 EXAMPLES…

  15. 1.PRIOR RESTRAINT

  16. PENTAGON PAPERSNY TIMES v. US 1971

  17. HAZLEWOOD – 1988SCHOOL PAPER MS. SHORT

  18. 2.CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGERU.S. v. SCHENK - 1919

  19. “MOVIE…MOVIE”

  20. GITLOW CASE – 192514TH AMENDMENT“incorporation”“STATES”

  21. 3.“IMMINENT THREAT”BRANDENBURGv. OHIO - 1969

  22. 4.LIBEL AKER IS A *&%$#$%*

  23. 5.SLANDER AKER IS A BUM!

  24. AKER V. NOLCOX2010

  25. “SEDITION”SPEECH VS. THE GOVERNMENT

  26. 6.OBSCENITYMILLER v. CALIF.1973

  27. BETHEL V. FRASER1986

  28. MORSE V. FREDERICK (2007)

  29. 7.PREFERRED POSITION

  30. 8.LEAST RESTRICTIVE RULE

  31. 9.SYMBOLIC SPEECHTINKER CASE - 1969

  32. TEXAS v. JOHNSON1989“FLAG BURNING”

  33. GREGORY JOHNSON AND LAWYER

  34. 10.CORPORATE SPEECH

  35. 11. $$$ “SPEECH”BUCKLEY v. VALEO

  36. RELIGION“FIRST 16 WORDS”E & E

  37. EXERCISE“BELIEF-SPEECH-CONDUCT DISTINCTION”

  38. WESTBORO BAPTIST CHURCH

  39. 1.POLYGAMYU.S. v REYNOLDS-1898

  40. 2.MEDICAL CARE

  41. 3.EDUCATION“AMISH EXCEPTION”

  42. 4. MILITARY CLAY v. U.S. - 1971

  43. “CONSCIENTIOUSOBJECTOR”

  44. 5. CONFIDENTIALITY

  45. ESTABLISHMENT7 EXAMPLES…“ separation of church and state????”

  46. LEMON v. KURTZMAN –1971THE LEMON TEST

  47. “EXCESSIVE ENTANGLEMENT”

  48. 1. “I PLEDGE…”

  49. 2. PRAYER IN SCHOOL

  50. ENGEL v. VITALE1962

More Related