1 / 22

Notation for Arguments

Notation for Arguments. Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U. Sequent Notation for Arguments. Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U. Sequent Notation: S>T, T>U | S>U. Sequent Notation for Arguments. Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U. Sequent Notation: S>T, T>U | S>U. Translating Arguments.

noriegaj
Télécharger la présentation

Notation for Arguments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U

  2. Sequent Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U Sequent Notation: S>T, T>U | S>U

  3. Sequent Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U Sequent Notation: S>T, T>U | S>U

  4. Translating Arguments Ifthe Bible is REVELATION thenit will WITHSTAND attack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation.

  5. Translating Arguments Ifthe Bible is REVELATION thenit will WITHSTAND attack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation. If R then W. W. So R.

  6. Translating Arguments Ifthe Bible is REVELATION thenit will WITHSTAND attack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation. If R then W. W. So R. If R then W, W | R

  7. Translating Arguments Ifthe Bible is REVELATION thenit will WITHSTAND attack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation. If R then W. W. So R. If R then W, W | R R>W, W | R

  8. Translating Arguments Ifthe Bible is REVELATION thenit will WITHSTAND attack.. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation. If R then W. W. So R. Sequent Notation: R>W, W | R Vertical Notation: R>W W R

  9. Translating Arguments Which sentence is the conclusion? Premise Indicators: Since Because For : Conclusion Indicators: So Therefore Hence Thus Consequently :

  10. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.

  11. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza. Pbecause I. I results in P.

  12. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza. Pbecause I. I results in P. P> I

  13. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza. Pbecause I. I results in P. P> I WRONG! ‘Because’ Indicates a PREMISE!

  14. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza. Pbecause I. I results in P. Conclusion Premise

  15. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza. Pbecause I. I results in P. I, I results in P | P Conclusion Premise

  16. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza. Pbecause I. I results in P. I, I results in P | P I, I>P | P Conclusion Premise

  17. Translating Arguments Don’t confuse antecedent indicators with premise indicators.

  18. Translating Arguments Don’t confuse antecedent indicators with premise indicators. The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE. E if C. C>E

  19. Translating Arguments Don’t confuse antecedent indicators with premise indicators. The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE. E if C. C>E The moon is EDIBLEbecause it is made of CHEESE. Ebecause C.

  20. Conclusion Premise Translating Arguments Don’t confuse antecedent indicators with premise indicators. The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE. E if C. C>E The moon is EDIBLEbecause it is made of CHEESE. Ebecause C.

  21. Conclusion Premise Translating Arguments Don’t confuse antecedent indicators with premise indicators. The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE. E if C. C>E The moon is EDIBLEbecause it is made of CHEESE. Ebecause C. C | E

  22. Conclusion Premise Translating Arguments Why > is different from |. The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE. E if C. C>E The moon is EDIBLEbecause it is made of CHEESE. Ebecause C. C | E Click here for more

More Related