1 / 12

Contact tracing in TB incidents/outbreak investigation: Case study in an acute hospital setting

Contact tracing in TB incidents/outbreak investigation: Case study in an acute hospital setting. Katie Hopgood Acting Consultant in Public Health k atie.hopgood@phe.gov.uk. The TB strategy for England. Improving access and early diagnosis High quality diagnostics

odell
Télécharger la présentation

Contact tracing in TB incidents/outbreak investigation: Case study in an acute hospital setting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Contact tracing in TB incidents/outbreak investigation:Case study in an acute hospital setting Katie Hopgood Acting Consultant in Public Health katie.hopgood@phe.gov.uk

  2. The TB strategy for England • Improving access and early diagnosis • High quality diagnostics • High quality treatment and care services • Contact tracing • Vaccination • Tackling drug resistance  • Tackling TB in underserved populations • New entrant screening for LTBI • Effective Surveillance and Monitoring • Workforce strategy

  3. Contact Tracing What? • The systematic contact workup in a possible transmission setting Why? • To find an unknown source case • To detect active cases early • To prevent potential reactivation How? • Identify close contacts (stone in the pond) • Identify active cases and epi links • Identify and treat recently acquired LTBI • Compromise between effectiveness/ cost-effectiveness (=yield) • Public reassurance • Pragmatism Source: WHO 2016 http://www.who.int/tb/strategy/end-tb/en

  4. NICE Pathway: TB Contact Tracing and Treatment Contact tracing in TB incidents/outbreak investigation

  5. Ripple in a pond example Contact tracing in TB incidents/outbreak investigation

  6. Case study – Contact tracing in an acute hospital 1 year attendance at local Dialysis unit 3 x 4h sessions per week, Taken by shared hospital transport (private company) ?8 month history of dry cough, no other symptoms reported ?Productive cough since July 24th Sept’17: Case taken by ambulance (SOB, general deterioration)in ED bay11pm-1am then GM ward 28th Sept’17: Direct PCR result received. MTB, smear positive. 4th Oct’17: Contact TB Nurse team to undertake risk assessment. (Retired, lived with wife, large number of extended family out of area – often stay when visiting) 16th Oct’17: Acute trust contact PHE to establish ICT 29th Sept’17: Massive haemoptysis, patient passed away Contact tracing in TB incidents/outbreak investigation

  7. Dialysis unit Contact tracing in TB incidents/outbreak investigation

  8. Small group exercise: • Handout details key events and contact definitions (5-10 mins) • In small groups of 4 think about applying the ‘ripple in a pond’ approach to this scenario. • Which key groups or individuals are you concerned might be at risk of infection? • Where do they sit in your risk stratification? Contact tracing in TB incidents/outbreak investigation

  9. Risk stratification 1.1: Infectious period: Three months prior to diagnosis (24th June – admission), admission 24th-29th September. 1.2: Contact definitions: 1.2.1: Close contacts: Family, friends, staff and/or patients that have been in close proximity, or a confined area, with the case for a prolonged period of time (greater than 8 hours on a single occasion, or 8 hours cumulative exposure). 1.2.2: ‘Social contacts’: Family, friends, staff and patients that have had contact with the case, but not been in prolonged, frequent or intense contact. Immunocompromised social contacts require individual assessment based on proximity/duration and immune competence - may need to be treated as a close contact. Contributoryfactors: Disease: AFB+ve, haemoptysis, coughing since late July 2017 – although not noticed to have a cough by Cossham staff, outcomes of household contact screens not yet known Duration of contact: Individually assessed, dialysis sessions 4-5 hours in duration Proximity of contact: Individually assessed, use of PPE, wheelchair/limited mobility Air circulation: No confined spacesand/or unventilated spaces Immune competence: Immunocompromised contacts requiring individual assessment LTBI testing and treatment programme -data returns and IG

  10. Highest Risk Higher Risk LTBI testing and treatment programme -data returns and IG

  11. Medium Risk Low Risk LTBI testing and treatment programme -data returns and IG

  12. Case study – Results A – Household contacts n=13 Active = 2 Latent = 1 Negative = 10 B –Dialysis unit close contacts n= 13 Active = 0 Latent = 0 Indeterminate – 2 Negative - 11 C – Hospital staff close contacts n=18 Active = 0 Latent =1 Negative = 17 D – Other dialysis unit users, ambulance crew, transport staff Warn and inform Contact tracing in TB incidents/outbreak investigation

More Related