90 likes | 201 Vues
This review critically assesses Australia’s fourth periodic report submitted to the Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC). It highlights the observations made regarding the reporting process, emphasizing the need for thorough and timely responses as per CRC guidelines. Key issues raised include legal frameworks, child welfare, and the challenges faced by marginalized children. The review discusses the effectiveness of periodic reporting in promoting human rights and the importance of addressing outcomes rather than just inputs. Ultimately, it calls for enhanced dialogue and commitment between the government and NGOs.
E N D
CRC’s Review of Australia Ben Schokman April 2012 www.hrlc.org.au
Overview • About the periodic reporting process • Observations on: • Australia’s fourth periodic report • Committee’s List of Issues • Utility of the periodic reporting process?
Purpose of Periodic Reporting • Promote implementation of the CRC • CRC art 44(1) • Report in accordance with the Committee’s guidelines in a “thorough and timely manner”
Reporting Guidelines • Reports should : • consider issues of principal concern in a methodical and informative manner • contain relevant legislative, judicial, administrative and other information, including statistical data • provide information about: • “factors and difficulties encountered” • “progress achieved” • “implementation priorities” • “specific goals” for the future
NGO Report NGO Addendum Lobbying Lobbying Periodic Reporting Process June 2009 Government’s periodic report October 2011 Pre-sessional meeting and List of Issues published April 2012 Government’s written response to List of Issues May 2012 Committee’s review of Australia and issues “Concluding Observations”
Australian Government’s Report • Overall, balanced and constructive… but an opportunity missed? • Focus on inputs ($$) and listing outputs (such as “plans”, “programs”, “frameworks”), and not on outcomes • Lack of statistical data • On many issues, there is selective reporting or non-reporting • Little focus on challenges, progress, priorities and goals
Committee’s List of Issues • Issues raised include: legal framework, early childhood, children’s commissioner, child abuse and neglect, corporal punishment, children with disabilities, ATSI children, immigration detention, juvenile justice • Further information on data and statistics • Further information on priorities for implementation
Utility of the periodic reporting process? • To secure the domestic implementation of international human rights standards • To use the outcomes of these mechanisms in advocacy and policy development at the domestic level • To create a dialogue with government • To develop knowledge of human rights in Australia • Human rights education • Network building
Ultimately… • Proper test will be follow up and implementation of the Concluding Observations • For both Government and for NGOs • Australia’s (re)engagement with the UN human rights system and commitment to being a “principled human rights leader”