1 / 8

To Know from Dancey et al. (2002)

This study by Dancey et al. (2002) explores the impact of illness intrusiveness on various life domains in individuals with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). It delves into stigma associated with IBS and examines how sex differences influence perceptions. The research connects concepts of perceived versus received stigma, highlighting issues of concealment and visibility of symptoms. Through lenses of educational attainment, income levels, and psychological symptomology, the study addresses coping strategies like secrecy and disengagement, aiming to foster a better understanding of the societal impacts on IBS patients.

orde
Télécharger la présentation

To Know from Dancey et al. (2002)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. To Know from Dancey et al. (2002) • Illness intrusiveness • Life domains IBS affected in this study • Stigma • Sex differences in IBS perceptions?

  2. Stigma • Characpotentially threatening to , , & overall well-being of pplsubject to (tied to evaluative inaxn) in society (Eckstein, 2014) • Perceived vs. Received • Discrediting vs. Discredited(Goffman, 1963) • Concealable/Hidden vs. Observable

  3. Outcomes(Major & O’Brien, 2005) • Educational attainment • IP Relationships • Income levels • Psychological symptomology • Housing options • Medical access • Quality of care • Physical health

  4. Types • Personality - • Relational - • Physical-Mental – • Behavioral/Character –

  5. Public Management Options(Link et al., 1991) • Education • Withdrawal • Disengagement from/denial of vulnerable situat. • Secrecy

  6. Coping/Interactive Management(Majors & O’Brien, 2005) • Blame  protect • blame  exert • Separate • Strive to excel in • Increase affiliat. • Challenge  distance self from stigm.grp • What determines strategy? • Indiv. Attrib’s for blame - • Identification with stigma ID - • Problem- vs. Emotion-focused coping (depend on salience of other ID realms)(Brashers et al., 2002)

More Related