1 / 16

Energy Use Implications of ICT Hardware

Energy Use Implications of ICT Hardware. NATO SCIENCE PROGRAMME in conjunction with the Carnegie Bosch Institute ADVANCED RESEARCH WORKSHOP: Life Cycle Analysis for Assessing Energy and Environmental Implications of Information Technology Budapest, Hungary September 1-3, 2003.

oria
Télécharger la présentation

Energy Use Implications of ICT Hardware

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Energy Use Implications of ICT Hardware NATO SCIENCE PROGRAMME in conjunction with the Carnegie Bosch Institute ADVANCED RESEARCH WORKSHOP: Life Cycle Analysis for Assessing Energy and Environmental Implications of Information Technology Budapest, Hungary September 1-3, 2003 by Andrius Plepys

  2. Why the issue? • Dynamism of ICT sector • Productivity and structural impacts • Role in sustainable development • Climate change policies • Energy security

  3. Energy and the New Economy • Decoupling between GDP growth and energy consumption often attributed to ICT sector

  4. Electricity crisis – a hoax or a reality? New York, August 15, 2003

  5. Internet to blame for the blackouts? • Interests of power suppliers (coal industry) • Poor planning and artificial price increase? El. consumption dynamics in Silicon Valley and California, 1990-2000 derived from California Energy Commission’s data (2002)

  6. From Mills to LBNL • National estimates of AEC ICT-related electricity consumption as % of national AEC

  7. However… • Absolute consumption will increase • Future predictions are fuzzy • Reportedly large energy saving potential

  8. Electricity consumption by component in non-residential sector Source: Roth et al. in ADL (2002)

  9. The power of power management • CPU – idling >90% of the time • Hardware actively used <25% of the time (Webber, 2001) • PM already saves 25%, but additional 15% could be saved by optimal set up (US EPA, 2002) • Largest saving potential in offices: • desktop computers/workstations • CRT monitors • Copiers & printers (Kawamoto et al., 2001)

  10. The two legs of power management Technology solutions Behavioural solutions - software (BIOSOS) - products (CRTLCD) - components (CPU) - awareness - knowledge - informed choice

  11. Relevancy of the issues - DC example • High power reliability costs dearly • Overestimated needs • Consumption insignificant on national scale, but a large share of ICT infrastructure • HVAC – largest consumer DC’s energy • Saving 20-40% technically feasible today • HVAC optimisation (airwater, CHP, to) • night switching • Economic barriers (large build-up, risk aversion)

  12. The impacts of trends • Wireless communications • Mobile devices • LCD displays • ICT diffusion into other products • Optic fibre – broadband – data traffic • The “last mile” limitations • Voice and data n-work convergence • E-services

  13. Shortcomings Methodological and data issues: • ICT definition and system boundaries • Allocation procedures • Data: • Behavioural data (!) • Power rating • Stock data and return rates

  14. Reflections • Electricity consumption – not significant today, but future is uncertain • Growth rate and saving potential makes it important for continuous research • Supply side: energy efficiency not always a design priority (often a trade-off with costs) • Demand side: marginal role of energy costs to encourage savings (hardware costs, performance, ergonomics before environmental considerations)

  15. Reflections • Technology can take care of some efficiency improvements • Behavioural changes are needed to fully exploit the potential savings • Market “failure”?

  16. A role for policy makers? • Economic instruments (e.g. green taxes) • Informational voluntary instruments (performance standards, labelling initiatives) • Governmental procurement for more energy efficient equipment • more research on policy role

More Related