1 / 61

Agenda

Agenda. Introductions Proposed Project Staffing Awareness of Project Issues Understanding of Scope - Project Overview Project Issues and Solutions/Unique Concepts Approach to Project Savings, enhanced design Quality Schedule Team Coordination Questions. Staffing.

oro
Télécharger la présentation

Agenda

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Agenda • Introductions • Proposed Project Staffing • Awareness of Project Issues • Understanding of Scope - Project Overview • Project Issues and Solutions/Unique Concepts • Approach to Project • Savings, enhanced design • Quality • Schedule • Team Coordination • Questions

  2. Staffing

  3. Benefits of Selecting the Jacobs Team • We have: • Designed and constructed a CFI before (this would be our 4th!) • Developed cost savings ideas for this project • Awarded VE Team of the Year for the last two years • Provided quality plans • Demonstrated ability to accelerate schedules (Advanced Production)

  4. Understanding of Scope Awareness • General project features • Typical section board • Feature Map Board • 48 month schedule • Funding (Design Only) • ROW estimate: $19,431,800 (PD&E) • Construction estimate: $41,930,903.44 (LRE) • Wetland mitigation estimate: $1,099,000 (PD&E)

  5. Approach Summary Approach • Cost Savings • Roadway Grade, Drainage ECWCD, CFI Reduced Footprint, Utilities Reduced Impact • Enhanced LOS • Summarize LOS enhancement over PD&E • Reduced Risk • CFI Veterans • VISSIM vs Synchro • Known Solution (vs untried Paraflow or other systems)

  6. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsRoadway Awareness/ Approach • Design Criteria • Design for SIS/FIHS • Design Speed • Follow process in PPM 1.9.2 • Design Speed 50 MPH –Current PPM • Versus Design Speed 55 MPH -PD&E • Design Variations (PPM updates since PD&E) • 29’ Border Width for High-Speed Suburban sections • Reduce base clearance without variation. Requires a reduction in resilient modulus

  7. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsRoadway Awareness/ Approach • PD&E Typical Section • Centered alignment with 200’ R/W • Six lane suburban • 30’ median, Paved shoulders, and Two 5’ sidewalks • Open drainage system

  8. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsRoadway Awareness/ Approach • Inside lanes tipped to median • Pros • 10” base clearance savings • Possible permitting benefits • Cons • Additional drainage costs • No space in median for ditch • Increased MOT and disruption to public

  9. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsRoadway Awareness/ Approach • Widening vs New Construction • Possible VE topic • Cost Savings in pavement, base, stabilization and embankment • Additional R/W required on north side to meet minimum border requirements

  10. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsRoadway Awareness/ Approach • SHGWT, Profile & Pavement Design • Coordination with geotechnical, drainage, and environmental

  11. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsRoadway Awareness/ Approach • Preliminary Pavement Design Alternatives • 3’ clearance standard • 2’ clearance requires 25% MR Reduction • 1’ clearance requires 50% MR Reduction

  12. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsRoadway Awareness/ Approach BEST VALUE • CCAS Analysis of Pavement Changes

  13. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsRoadway Awareness/Approach • Airport (SWFIA) Proximity • Proposed Approach within 7 mile radius

  14. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsRoadway • Airport (SWFIA) Criteria • 30 day notification required for construction within 20,000 ft of R/W 6-24 exceeding 15 ft. height restriction Awareness/ Approach

  15. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsRoadway • CFI Alternatives and R/W Impacts Awareness/ Approach • Alternative #1 • Based on PD&E • 48,155 SQFT R/W • Alternative # 2 • Reduced Median • 29,078 SQFT R/W • Alternative # 3 • Skewed Alignment • 15,344 SQFT R/W

  16. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsRoadway Awareness/Approach • Adjacent Project Coordination • Proposed Approach: S/W continuity and shift south to match • Access Management - Reclaimed Strip • Proposed Approach: Drainage swale over-capacity • Access Management Changes (Class 3) • Proposed Approach: • Follow CAMP • Solution – Allow for RT in RT out in reclaimed strip • Solution – Coordinate Access at the CFI • ADA Ped/Bike • Proposed Approach: Keyholes, etc • Utilities • Design with utility impact in mind • Existing Driveways to remain • Proposed Approach: Include access berms to FPL

  17. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsRoadway Awareness/Approach • MOT (TCP Level II) • Proposed Approach • Side street access and Lee Memorial access • Lane closure avoidance on SR • New District Lane Closure Policy • Construction coordination with adjacent local school, tourist season and special events • Positive drainage • Temporary signals • Three phases

  18. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsRoadway • Phase II Awareness/ Approach • Phase I

  19. Roadway Summary Awareness/Approach • Typical section • Pavement design • Airport • CFI alternatives • Traffic control

  20. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsDrainage Awareness/Approach • Conceptual Pond Siting Report • 5 roadway drainage basins • Receiving waters • Identified Orange River • Six Mile Cypress Slough • Estero River • Off-site wet detention as preferred alternatives • Recommended investigating linear ponds during design phase • Added 25% treatment volume to account for new stormwater rule • Pond sizes based on diverting off-site flows

  21. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsDrainage Awareness/Approach • Stormwater Pond Design Issues • Offsite flow • Orange/Estero drainage divide • Uniform Stormwater Rule • Ultimate outfalls • Timeline • BMP/BMAP

  22. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsDrainage Awareness/Approach

  23. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsDrainage Awareness/Approach • Stormwater Pond Design Concepts • Linear treatment • Will likely be required for TMDL criteria • Profile and Retention • Smaller pond size • Pond consolidation • Joint use with DRI • Cooperation with ECWCD

  24. Drainage Summary Awareness/Approach • Coordination and JPA with ECWCD can reduce overall project cost by $5M • Raising the grade will support this concept • Team is experienced with the evolving stormwater rules (November 2009 memo, Uniform Stormwater, and EPA Numeric Nutrient ) and working within BMAP and Impaired Waters • We can accelerate the PSR if we need to have the permit process underway sooner

  25. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsEnvironmental & Permitting Awareness/Approach • Environmental & Permitting   • Protected Species • Wetlands • Permitting

  26. Project Issues & Unique Concepts Environmental & Permitting Awareness/ Approach • Protected Species • Determinations of Affect from PD&E

  27. Project Issues & Unique Concepts Environmental & Permitting • Caracara Survey is not needed and won’t affect the schedule Awareness/ Approach

  28. Project Issues & Unique Concepts Environmental & Permitting Awareness/ Approach • Wetland Impacts • PD&E preferred alternative – 11.03 acres • 10.23 ac Herbaceous, 0.8 ac Scrub shrub) • Surface Waters • May require mitigation • Mitigation • Mitigation banks • Corkscrew • $95K/credit, credits available

  29. Project Issues & Unique Concepts Environmental & Permitting Awareness/ Approach • Permitting • SFWMD – Individual ERP • USACE – Dredge and Fill

  30. Environmental & Permitting Summary Awareness/Approach • Site does not meet D1 Criteria for a wildlife crossing • Caracara survey is not needed and will not affect the schedule • Permitting schedule may be accelerated ahead of the Uniform Stormwater Rule • Mitigation will be handled with banks

  31. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsUtilities Awareness/ Approach

  32. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsUtilities Awareness/Approach • Impacts • Transmission lines • Most utilities located at R/W Line • Depth of cover issues • Early and Consistent Coordination Reduces Impacts to Schedule • Transmission Lines: FP&L, Lee County Electric Coop, Maintain Access • Municipalities: City of Fort Myers, Lee County • SUE • Coordination with District Staff

  33. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsUtilities Awareness/Approach • D1 Utilities Project Management Report

  34. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsAdditional Disciplines Awareness/Approach • Noise Analysis • Potential wall location • Jeff James discipline meeting • Noise re-analysis • Surveys/Public meeting • Signalization – Outside Mast Arm Zone • Mast Arm – non painted (unless LFA) • Strain Poles – Single point unless Lee County require 2-point (will require variation) • District One Rock Note

  35. Project Issues & Unique Concepts Additional Disciplines Awareness/Approach • Signing & Pavement Marking(other than CFI) • Pavement transition at project ends • Ensure new striping on new friction course • Audible Pavement Markings • Required on rural flush shoulders but not in urban areas (West of Lee Memorial) • Lighting • Existing lighting at Colonial and Daniels • Panther crossing deterrent • Spread footer design per PnP/Airport Issues • Landscaping • Existing landscaping • Maintenance agreement

  36. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsProven CFI Experience Awareness/Approach • Designed first CFI in Utah in 2007 • Sold via open houses and media • Surprise = No Surprises • Easy to navigate • Designing 2nd & 3rd • All alternatives to interchanges • Many visitors

  37. Bangerter/3500S Awareness/Approach

  38. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsProven CFI Experience Awareness/Approach • Brandon Kidd – CFI Quality Control    • LT Double Stops/Starvation • Phasing/Geometric Flexibility • Storage/No. Lanes Tied to Phasing • Access Business/Peds/Bicycles

  39. Project Issues & Unique ConceptsUnderstanding SR 82 CFI Issues Awareness/Approach • Alternatives • Paraflow • Median U-turns • Others

  40. SR 82 Alternative Concept Video Awareness/Approach

  41. CFI LOS Comparison D Awareness/Approach • LOS D Maintained • Delay Reduced • Footprint Reduced

  42. SR 82 Fly Through

  43. CFI Summary Awareness/Approach • Lessons learned from our previous CFIs • Traffic modeling tool (VISSIM) important • Reduce lanes/reduce ROW • Additional ideas may eliminate ROW

  44. Four-Legged ApproachUDOT Bangerter/4500S Another first of it’s kind for Utah DOT Awareness/Approach

  45. Quality Control Approach • Jacobs Standard QC Process • Discipline Checking Process • Inter-Disciplinary Check • Sub QC – Peer Review • Management QC Challenge • Don’t just follow process, excel in quality

  46. Quality ControlHow We Will Excel Approach • Peer review for the “new” CFI • Build time in for reviewers • Provide reviewers proper tools (Design Memos, etc) • Submittal continuity (ERC) • Environmental commitment compliance • Record QC to facilitate internal and external audits

  47. Quality ControlQA/QC Plan Components Approach • Standard process • QC matrix example for each submittal • Subconsultant QC plan • Project-specific enhancements • Draft QC Plan provided w/in 20 working days of NTP • Final QC Plan signed by all discipline leads and QC personnel • Submittals certification form by PM and QC manager

  48. Schedule Approach • Living document • Started with the JRP template • Continued revising after 8/5/10 • Deleted unneeded activities and WBS • Manatee surveys • Mitigation plans • Connected relevant deliverables • 4 year per RFP

  49. Schedule Critical Path Approach

More Related