260 likes | 1.01k Vues
How to Deal with the Potential Breakdown of Computer Networks. Invited Presentation ED-MEDIA 2005 Montreal, July 2, 2005. Hermann Maurer Graz University of Technology and JOANNEUM RESEARCH Graz/ Austria. We live in an age of extensive division of labor and globalization.
E N D
How to Deal with the Potential Breakdown of Computer Networks Invited Presentation ED-MEDIA 2005 Montreal, July 2, 2005 Hermann Maurer Graz University of Technology and JOANNEUM RESEARCH Graz/ Austria © H. Maurer
We live in an age of extensive division of labor and globalization. Computerization is enabling and speeding up this process and introduces a new phenomenon: Division of labor and globalization extend more and more also to non- material products (information, software, publishing, knowledge,…) Good example: WWW (Wikipedia!) and digital libraries. © H. Maurer
Advantages of Globalization Access to many things that otherwise we would not have More efficient production (climate, raw-material,…), Certain efforts are only possible through massivecollaboration: The ‚animal‘ humankind is able to do things small groups of individuals could not do © H. Maurer
Disadvantages of Globalization Potential exploitation (without consideration for people and environment,…) Arbitrary shift of production facilities (unemployment, waste,…) Increases transport (i.e. dependency on oil which is a danger for peace and environment!) Globalization creates dangerous dependencies © H. Maurer
... and then the Internet collapsed one day… © H. Maurer
Could it really happen that computers and computer networks fail in large regions for prolonged periods? Yes. The danger is particularly high due to a targeted attack. It is a miracle that no serious case of cyber-attack has occurred yet! Note interconnection between power grid and computers / computer networks ! Power grid e.g. out for 6 weeks in Auckland in 2002! © H. Maurer
The latest book inmy “Xperts-Series” describes exactly such a scenario. www.iicm.edu/Xperts © H. Maurer
The XPERTS- Saga The Telekinetic (Maurer) The Paracommunicator (Lennon) The Paradoppelganger(Maurer) The Parashield(Osborne) eSmog! (Backhaus) Mindwave (Shearer) The Parawarriors(Maurer) The Paranet (Maurer) Fighting big Brother (Maurer) © H. Maurer
Some figures Incidents 2003: 137.729 http://www.cert.org/stats/ © H. Maurer
Further figures © H. Maurer
Who believes in a dramatic collapse within the next ten years? “Some 66% agreed with the following prediction: At least one devastating attack will occur in the next 10 years on the networked infrastructure or the nationwide power grid” (PEW Report on “The Future of the Internet”, January 9, 2005) Persons interviewed included e.g. Vincet Cerf, Esther Dyson, Bob Metcalfe, Dan Gillmore, Simon Garfinkel, Howard Rheingold, David Weinberger, usw. © H. Maurer
Report for the President February 2005 © H. Maurer
Consequences of complete breakdown are catastrophic: clear How can we avoid them? • (1) Increase stability of computers and networks! • Globalization where necessary, but regionalization wherever reasonable • Reduce terrorism. One aspect is to reduce injustice in world as one of the reasons for terrorism. Help third world with IT © H. Maurer
Reduce injustice in the world “Balance or Destruction” F.J. Radermacher Basic idea: future increase in productionis possible without further damaging the environment. This growth has to be distributed unevenly. “Global Marshall Plan” © H. Maurer
Help in the third world using IT Spread new local knowledge world wide Example: How to boil water with limited fuel © H. Maurer
Boiling water © H. Maurer
Help in the third world with IT Spread new local knowledge world –wide Other examples are e.g. can-houses, sandbags, chistosoma,… © H. Maurer
Globalization where necessary, regionalization where reasonable e.g.: “Asymmetric distance tax” based on GNP:--- increases stability through self sufficiency --- supports new distribution of wealth --- supports regionalization and natural life --- also holds for non-material aspects © H. Maurer
Computers und networks must become more secure (stable)! e.g. radical approach: Give up John von Neumann computer concept Operating systems and basic software on chips Write-once storage (may be with mechanical override) Use network only when needed © H. Maurer
Other approaches Thin clients in networks where much is done in servers Redundant networks and addressing schemes Variety of operating systems/ configurable OS Croquet project: www.opencroquet.org © H. Maurer
Other approaches Use of crytopgraphic co-processors Like in:www.trustedcomputinggroup.org Can possibly lead to unwanted control www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq.html www.iicm.edu/Xperts © H. Maurer
F.J. Radermacher in “Balance or Destruction” talks about the balance between countries. We need this, but we also need a healthy balance between globalization and regionalization, and a clean solution for secure computing without the dangers inherent in “Trusted Computing”. © H. Maurer
What will YOU do after this talk to help improve the stability of our systems? At least--- tell everyone: In a very globalized networked society we are more vulnerable than is good for us, unless we start to increase the safety of our systems right now! © H. Maurer
Just think: what would happen if electricity fails for 6 weeks in the central USA and a 1400 miles radius around it in, say, January 2007? © H. Maurer
Thanks for your attention!H.Maurer URLs: www.know-center.at www.hyperwave.comwww.iicm.edu/maurer email: hmaurer@iicm.edu More on related stuff: www.iicm.edu/Xperts © H. Maurer