1 / 23

Study of  c Decays at BES

Study of  c Decays at BES. Zijin Guo University of Hawaii (Representing BES Collaboration) Quarkonium Working Group ’04, IHEP Beijing October 13, 2004. OUTLINE Introduction  cJ  pp,   cJ  h + h - KsKs  cJ  K * (892) 0 K * (892) 0  c0  f 0 (980)f 0 (980)

otylia
Télécharger la présentation

Study of  c Decays at BES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Study of c Decays at BES Zijin Guo University of Hawaii (Representing BES Collaboration) Quarkonium Working Group ’04, IHEP Beijing October 13, 2004

  2. OUTLINE • Introduction • cJ  pp,  • cJ  h+h-KsKs cJ  K*(892)0K*(892)0 c0  f0(980)f0(980) • c2 polarization • Summary   

  3. INTRODUCTION Charmonium System

  4. Exclusive quarkonium decays contribute an important laboratory for investigating QCD. • Compared to J/ decays, relatively little is known concerning PC = ++ cJdecays. • Color octet mechanism (COM) important for P-wave quarkonium decays. A consistent set of theoretical predictions for the branching fractions, as well as more precise experimental measurements will lead to a better understanding of the COM and the nature of cJ states. • Furthermore, the decays of cJ, in particularc0 and c2, provide a direct window on glueball dynamics in the 0++ and 2++ channels. C. Amsler and F. Close, PRD53 (1996) 295

  5. World (2S) Samples (×106) Largest from BES (2S) 2002 BESII Detector

  6.  cJ  pp,  Color octet mechanism (COM) important for P-wave quarkonium decays. G. T. Bodwin et al., Phys Rev. Lett. D51, 1125 (1995). H.-W. Huang and K.-T. Chao, Phys. Rev. D54, 6850 (1996). J. Bolz et al., Phys. Lett. B392, 198 (1997). Color singlet graphs (qq) for CJ → . Coloroctetgraphs (qqg)

  7. cJ   (2S)  cJ  ΛΛ  p-p+ Monte Carlo  Data Clear Λ Λ-bar signal

  8. cJ signal Data/Monte Carlo c1 c0 c2 Sideband background +1.3 +1.0 +1.5  -1.2 -0.9 -1.3 PRD67, 112001 (2003)

  9. cJ  pp Final states: pp c0 c1 c2

  10. COM for cJB B Discussion Calculate Many systematic errors cancel! • The results on c1 and c2 decays only agree marginally with model predictions. • No prediction for c0 . Phys.Rev.D69:092001,2004

  11. cJ  h+h-KsKs (2S)  cJ cJ → KSKS cJ → +-KSKS BESII Preliminary cJ → K+K-KSKS

  12. BESII Preliminary • The branching fractions ofcJ decays to +-KSKS and • K+K-KSKS are observed for the first time. • The branching fractions ofc0 andc2 decays to KSKS are • measured with improved precision.

  13. cJ  K*(892)0K*(892)0 Measure more decays to better understand P-wave decays. Study χcJ → K*(892) K*(892) → K+K-+- Require Prob(24C) > 1% and higher than +-+- and K+K-K+K- cases, and PID imposed. (2S)→ +-K+K-

  14. K*(892) significance = 4.7σ, 4.5σ, 7.6σ c0 c1 c2 Accepted by Phys. Rev. D, hep-ex/0408012

  15. c0  f0(980)f0(980) f0(980) controversial: Even mass and width complicated by KK threshold. Experimental results needed. Study (2S) → χc0 → f0f0 → +-+- Require Prob(24c) > 1%. • qq-bar meson? • KK-bar molecule? • multiquark state? • glueball ?

  16. c0 → +-+- c2 → +-+- f0f0

  17. Plot mass recoiling from f0(980) f0 Results N = 65 – 51/1.75 = 35.9 ± 9.0 significance = 4.6σ ε = (3.92 ± 0.07)% B((2S) → c0 →  f0f0 → +-+-) = (6.5 ± 1.6 ± 1.3) x 10-5 B(c0 → f0f0 → +-+-) = (7.6 ± 1.9 ± 1.6) x 10-4 Accepted by PRD, hep-ex/0406079

  18. c2 polarization in (2S)  c2, c2  +-, K+K- • In general, it is believed that (2S)  cJ is dominated by the E1 transition, but with some M2 (for c1 and c2) and E3 contributions (for c2). • The calculated pure E1 transition rates and the experimental results are quite different. Determine the contributions of the higher multipoles • S- and D-wave mixing of (2S) and (3770) may be the key to solve the long-standing  puzzle and to explain (3770) non-DD decays. • Crystal Ball studied the decay angular distributions in (2S)  c2 using(2S)  J/ first; no significant higher multipoles found (with limited statistics).

  19. No background from c1 since the c1  +-, K+K- processes are forbidden by parity conservation.

  20. The helicity amplitudes are determined by a maximum likelihood fit to the angular distribution, where x=A1/A0, y=A2/A0, A0,1,2 are the c2 helicity amplitudes.

  21. combine them, : correlation factor quadrapole amplitude a2´ (CB) octupole amplitude a3´ +- K+K- consistent with the pure E1 transition well good agreement is observed in all angular distributions Accepted by PRD, hep-ex/0409034

  22. SUMMARY    • c decays to pp,, h+h-KsKs, K*0K*0 and f0(980)f0(980) are measured for the first time or with higher sensitivity using BESII’s 14 million (2S) data sample. helpful to better understand the nature of c statesandtest the new QCD approach. • The helicity amplitudes of (2S)  c2 are measured forc2  +- and K+K-, and x =2.08  0.44, y = 3.03  0.66 with correlation  = 0.92 are obtained. in good agreement with a pure E1 transition • More experimental facts are desired Theoretical predictions…

  23. Thank you 谢谢

More Related