1 / 35

The Watershed Action Plan

The Watershed Action Plan. Chapter 10: Realizing the WMI Vision August Draft. Today’s Presentation. Project Status & Schedule Chapter 10 Contents Completing and Selling the Action Plan. Milestones. February General Features. June Draft Ch. 1-9. August Draft Ch. 10. October

ouida
Télécharger la présentation

The Watershed Action Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Watershed Action Plan Chapter 10: Realizing the WMI Vision August Draft

  2. Today’s Presentation • Project Status & Schedule • Chapter 10 Contents • Completing and Selling the Action Plan

  3. Milestones February General Features June Draft Ch. 1-9 August Draft Ch. 10 October Complete Draft December Core Group Approval January Retreat March Outline

  4. Process Actions WAPTAG COS WMI Vision Final WAP Draft Chapters 1 - 9 Draft Ch. 10 Draft WAP Comments We are here WMI Goals Retreat

  5. Chapter 10 Realizing the WMI Vision

  6. Chapter 10 Contents • Why the Santa Clara Basin needs the WMI • The WMI’s Strengths and Key Functions • The WMI’s Nine Strategic Policy Objectives • Implementation • Conclusion

  7. Why the Basin needs the WMI • Increase in mandated & voluntary programs • Programs interact and overlap • Potential for confusion and conflict • Need to align, coordinate and integrate • Streamline regulations • Accelerate preservation and enhancement • Economic benefit

  8. The WMI’s Strengths • What we’ve achieved • Common vision, goals, and objectives • Consensus on a balanced approach • Recognize each other’s legitimate interests • Track record of successes • What we do best • Articulate & communicate a vision of the future • Facilitate exchange of ideas & perspectives • Achieve consensus among different interests

  9. Prioritizing Actions & Tasks Chapters 1 - 9 Policies & Programs Actions & Tasks Chapter 10 Action Worksheets (112) Stream Stewardship Policy Objectives HCPs/NCCPs Floodplain Mgt. WMI Role General Plans TMDLs

  10. Future Functions • Facilitate stakeholder groups • Add fresh technical & policy perspectives • Recommend solutions to policy-makers • Bring consensus to boards, managers, & funders • Educate and involve the public • Develop indicators • Issue reports

  11. Nine Policy Objectives • Stream Stewardship Planning • Floodplains & Riparian Corridors • Habitat Conservation Planning • Expanding the National Wildlife Refuge • General Plans & Specific Area Plans • Drainage Systems that Retain or Detain Runoff • Better Assessments, TMDLs, & Permits • Integrated Water Resources Planning • Coordinating Outreach

  12. 1. Stream Stewardship Planning Objectives • Integrate Restoration & Flood Protection • Use a Floodplain Management Approach • Remove Barriers to Fish • Restore Stream Beds and Banks • Restore Shaded Riparian Aquatic Habitat • Coordinate FAHCE, SMP, SPP, Sediment TMDLs • Commit to Long-term Adaptive Management

  13. 2. Floodplain & Riparian Planning Objectives • Coordinate & Integrate: • National Flood Insurance Program • Countywide Trail Master Plan & Guidelines • Recreational Facilities • Protected Habitat Areas • Regional Stormwater Facilities • Shared sense of place

  14. 3. Habitat Conservation Planning Objectives • Adaptive management – specific, measurable • Update and improve habitat surveys • Incorporate existing refuges and public lands • Acquire new land for critical habitat • Restore native plants & animals • Coordinate with strategic plans & General Plans

  15. 4. National Wildlife Refuge Expansion • Comprehensive planning process • Issue permits timely to allow restoration • Plan for levee maintenance & flood protection • Apply Bay Ecosystem Habitat Goals • Preserve & expand contiguous critical habitat

  16. 5. General Plans & Specific Area Plans • Detailed maps of habitat corridors • Coordinate acquisition & mgt. of open space • Assess cumulative impacts at appropriate scale • Encourage smart growth

  17. 6. Site Development & Drainage • Implement C.3. provisions • Develop public works specifications and details • Coordinate hydromodification management planning with stream stewardship planning

  18. #7. Objectives for Better Assessments, TMDLs & Permits • Coordinate monitoring & assessment • Acknowledge different objectives & methodology • Test problem statements & conceptual models • Coordinate investigations to optimize support for listing decisions and TMDLs • Build on successes with POTW permits and site-specific objectives

  19. #8. Integrated Water Resources Planning Objectives • Develop broad representation in the IWRP process • Gauge & build public support for conservation & recycling • Integrate conservation & recycling with objectives for stream stewardship & habitat conservation

  20. #9. Objectives for Outreach • Align & coordinate messages around the vision. • Stream functions; effects of urbanization; Multiple uses of floodplains in urban areas; Smart Growth; Importance of imperviousness; Water conservation, recycling & stream habitat; Habitat reserves; Pollution Prevention • Inform public & stakeholders about public policies & investment needed to achieve our vision. • Annual report updating key indicators of watershed health and WMI achievements and successes

  21. Chapter 10 Contents (Review) • Why the Santa Clara Basin needs the WMI • The WMI’s Strengths and Key Functions • The WMI’s Nine Strategic Policy Objectives • Implementation • Conclusion

  22. Needs for Implementation • Commitments from Signatories • Process to prioritize future actions • Capacity • Structure for decision-making • Staff

  23. WMI will ask signatories to: • Adopt policy objectives • Assign stakeholder processes to WMI • Provide resources to make process work • Cu/Ni Technical Working Group is a model • Provide resources to support integration

  24. Prioritize Future Actions • WMI is a clearinghouse for new actions • Facilitate consensus on how and where new actions can be implemented • Prioritize by: • Relevance to WMI policy objectives • Effectiveness in attaining the objectives • Timeliness • Use of WMI resources

  25. WMI Needs Capacity to: • Facilitate stakeholder processes • Bring consensus recommendations to decision-makers • Formulate, refine, disseminate the WMI message

  26. Capacity • WMI Structure • Retain existing WMI decision-making structure (with minor changes) • Expand WMI executive capabilities & authority • WMI Staff • Leadership • Enough staff to fulfill WMI role

  27. Action Plan Conclusion • Ten years from now, the need for a WMI will be obvious. • The Basin has a WMI now. • The WMI has an Action Plan now. • Stakeholders have the opportunity to strengthen the WMI & entrust with the challenges that lie ahead.

  28. Completing & Selling the Action Plan Product Development  Sales

  29. Signatories’ Decisions to “Buy-in” • Adopt Policy Objectives in Chapter 10 • Assign stakeholder processes to WMI • Integrated Stream Stewardship Planning • Sediment TMDLs, Stream Protection Policy • Floodplain & Riparian Planning/Mapping • National Wildlife Refuge Expansion Planning • Habitat Conservation Planning • General Plans & Specific Plans • Provide additional resources to WMI

  30. Signatories’ Steps to Decision • Acknowledge the problem • Accept the value of aligning, coordinating, & integrating plans and policies • Believe that WMI can add value to process • Commit “in concept” to WMI role • Negotiate specific agreements

  31. Schedule • August 2: COS group reviews objectives • August 19: Core Group comments on Ch. 10 • August 20: WAPTAG discusses comments • August 23: “Dry run” of presentation to REF • September 4: Regulatory Executive Forum • September 5: Report back to Core Group • September 24: Complete draft distributed

  32. Schedule • October 3: Presentation of Complete Draft • October: Core Group comments on draft • December 5: Core Group approval of Watershed Action Plan • Core Group members will take Action Plan back to their agencies with expectation that it will be approved

  33. In 2003… • Agency Staff Reports to Boards & Councils • Action Plan is attachment or reference • Agencies adopt policies to: • Approve WMI policy objectives • Engage in WMI stakeholder processes • Provide WMI with funding and resources • Coordinate outreach on WMI issues

  34. In 2003, WMI will need to: • Lead and facilitate discussions with agency managers and department heads • Coordinate and assist with staff reports and council/board meetings • Convene & facilitate initial meetings for stakeholder groups

  35. Discussion

More Related