Enhancing Women’s Health in Atlantic Canada: A Gender-Based Analysis
660 likes | 798 Vues
This comprehensive analysis explores the intersection of gender and health in Atlantic Canada, emphasizing the unique health needs of women. Key themes include the importance of gender-based analysis in health policy, the need for improved health indicators, and the identification of gaps in data, particularly regarding diversity. The report highlights how socio-economic factors, including income and single-parent status, impact women's health outcomes. By integrating gender perspectives into health policy, this analysis aims to guide effective interventions and promote better health outcomes for women in Canada.
Enhancing Women’s Health in Atlantic Canada: A Gender-Based Analysis
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Genuine Progress Index for Atlantic CanadaIndice de progrès véritable - AtlantiqueGender-Based Analysis and Indicators of Women’s Health in CanadaHealth Canada Policy Forum Ottawa, 9 October, 2003
Five themes • Practical utility of gender-based analysis • Interactive nature of health determinants • Additional women’s health indicators needed beyond usual population health indictors • Data improvements and gaps - especially for diversity analysis • Purpose = policy link = point to key social interventions to improve women’s health
Pop. health context: Romanow and the 3 burning health policy issues 1) How to treat the sick - supply side 2) How to improve the health of Canadians 3) How to check spiralling health care costs - demand side The next Royal Commission......
Practical: High portion of illness burden is preventable Excess Risk Factors Account for: • 40% chronic disease incidence • 50% chronic disease premature mortality • 25% direct medical care costs • 38% total burden of disease (includes direct and indirect costs)
Why a Gender Perspective 1) Descriptive: Women have distinct health needs. Causes / outcomes differ by gender 2) Normative: Ensure equal treatment, overcome biases that impede wellbeing 3) Practical: Blunt, across-board solutions often miss mark, waste money. Gender analysis allows policy makers to target health dollars
Practical: Women’s use of health services • Canadian women have higher rates of: • chronic illness, physician visits • disability days, activity limitations • lower functional health status • In every age group to 75, women more likely see physicians than men. Overall - 33% more likely; age 18-54 - 2-3x
E.g….. Teenage smoking • Teen girls higher rates than boys • Young women have 2x stress cf young men • Surveys: young women say stress relief and weight loss = primary reasons for smoking • Therefore programs, brochures, counselling targeted to girls more effective than blanket one-size-fits-all health warnings
1998 Federal Health Minister • “I have undertaken to fully integrate gender-based analysis in all of my Department’s program and policy development work...” • “...to enhance the sensitivity of the health system to women’s health issues...” • “...more research...on the links between women’s health and their social and economic circumstances.”
1) Income: What does it have to do with women’shealth? • Poverty most reliable predictor of poor health, premature death, disability: 4x more likely report fair or poor health • Low income- higher risk smoking, obesity, physical inactivity, heart risk • Costly: increased hospitalization: Women 15-39 = +62%; 40-64 = +92%
……health of single mothers • Worse health status than married (NPHS); higher rates chronic illness, disability days, activity restrictions • 3x health care practitioner use for mental, emotional reasons = costly • Longer-term single mothers have particularly bad health (Statcan)
Low income children- at risk - 31 indicators • More likely to have low birth weights, poor health, less nutritious foods • Higher rates of hyperactivity, delayed vocabulary development, poorer employment prospects. • Less organized sports, but higher injury rates, and 2x risk of death due to injury than children who are not poor.
Trend:Low income rates ofchildren: Single mother families ---1991-2000
The Economics of Single-Parenting • Single mothers with pre-school children spend 12% income on child care cf 4% in 2-parent families. In one pocket ......... • CPI for child care, restaurant food rises faster than wages • Robin Douthitt: “time poverty”. Full-time single mothers = 75 hour week
2) Equity and health “What matters in determining mortality and health in a society is less the overall wealth of the society and more how evenly wealth is distributed. The more equally wealth is distributed, the better the health of that society.” ----- British Medical Journal 312, 1998
If Equality->Health, What are Trends?Average Disposable H’hold Income Ratios, 1980-98
Gender wage gap remains unchanged- Ratio of Female to Male Hourly wages: 1997-2001
Explaining the gender wage gap • Convergence of women’s hourly wages stalled…. despite clear educational gains. • After controlling for hours worked, educational attainment, work experience, industry, occupation, and socio-demographic factors, StatsCan concluded that: …….. • ….“roughly one half to three quarters of the gender wage gap cannot be explained.”(Drolet, 2001)
Differences among Cdn women: e.g. Regional wealth gap grows: Atlantic region cf Ontario, Canada: • 1990 = $0.82 disp.income NS for $1 in Ontario. 1998 = $0.73 Financial Security Atlantic Canada • 1984: 5.4 % of national wealth. • 1999: 4.4% “ “ (7.8% of Canadian population)
Wealth gap in Canada: • Richest 10% own 53% of wealth • Richest 50% own 94.4%, leaving 5.6% for poorest 50% • Poorest ¼ of Canadians own 0.1% (or one-thousandth of wealth) • Among poorest 20%, 1/3 fell behind 2+ months in bill, loan, rent, mortgage = Importance of diversity approach
3) Employment-a key determinant of women’s health Issues: • Both overwork and unemployment are stressful- (Japanese study) • Polarization of work hours -increasing the level of inequality in family earnings. • Women’s health - function of paid + unpaid work - gender division of labour in household • Women doubled employment, BUT still do nearly two-thirds of household work.
Women with young children- sharpest increase in employment, Since 1976: • women without children have increased their employment rate by 26%; • women with youngest child 6-15 by 62%; • women with youngest child 3-5 by 83%; • women with youngest child 0-2 by 124%
But distribution is uneven -Employment and Education • 75.4% of female university graduates have a job, cf 79.3% of male graduates. • But… women with less than grade 9 are less than half as likely to be employed as males – 13.6% of women cf 29.4% of men • Gender analysis not just m/f but diversity - sub-groups of women - esp. vulnerable
Women increased professional status - I.e. strong educational improvement
4) While f-t women work 39 hrs cf 43 - men, women still do most unpaid housework
Employed mothers (f/t) work average 75-hr week - pd+unpd Statcan: Women moving to longer work hours: • 4x likely smoke more, 2x likely drink more • 40% more likely decrease physical activity • 80% more likely have unhealthy weight gain • 2.2x more likely experience major depressive episodes cf women on standard hours
Less stressful alternatives(societal vs individual solutions)
Social supports are important • Social networks may play as important a role in protecting health, buffering against disease, and aiding recovery from illness as behavioural and lifestyle choices such as quitting smoking, losing weight, and exercising. • See: Mustard, J.F., & Frank, J. (1991).The Determinants of Health. (CIAR Publ. No. 5).
Key Social Supports-Volunteerism and Family • Health Canada uses volunteerism as a key indicator of a “supportive social environment” that can enhance health. • Volunteerism declining: 1997-2000 Canada lost 960,000 volunteers. 1997 = 29% men, 33% women vol’d 2000 = 25% men, 28% women • Remaining volunteers work 9% more hours
Family violence = key indicator of women’s health • CIHI, Statcan identify crime as “non-medical determinant of health.” But women’s health analysis requires special indicators - family violence, like unpaid work, is key indicator. • Family identified as key pillar of social support - determinant of health. But family violence may undermine social support, health
Family=high % of all violence • Spousal violence = 18% of all violence reported to police. • Women = 85% of all reported spousal abuse = 6x rate for men • Nearly 1/3 of all reported female victims of violence in Canada attacked by spouse • Unreported - much higher = 8% all women with partner attacked past 5 years.
Importance of diversity approach. E.g 1: Aboriginal women’s health • Life expectancy = 76.2 cf 81 (non-Abor.) • Higher rates hypertension, cervical cancer, circulatory & respiratory diseases • Diabetes = 3x non-Abor. Fem = 2x male • HIV/AIDS = 2x non-Abor. 50% female Abor AIDS cases = IV drug use cf 17% • 9% Aboriginal mothers under 18 cf 1%
Aboriginal women’s health • 3x mortality due to violence. 25-44 = 5x • Alcohol-related accidents = 3x • Fetal alcohol syndrome. Over 50% view alcohol abuse as problem in community • 3x suicide rate cf non-Aborig. women
E.g.2:Regional disparities require special attention / intervention E.g Cape Breton…. • High unemployment and low-income rates, • Much higher incidence of chronic illness, disability, and premature death than Halifax • Highest age-standardized mortality rate in Maritimes • Highest death rate from circulatory disease, heart disease in Maritimes – 30% above national average