html5-img
1 / 9

Caspian Environment Programme

Caspian Environment Programme. Principal CO Experience UNDP Azerbaijan. About the CEP. CEP reflects the regional desire for environmental cooperation; Almaty Declaration , Tehran Wrap Up Meeting etc

padma
Télécharger la présentation

Caspian Environment Programme

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Caspian Environment Programme Principal CO Experience UNDP Azerbaijan

  2. About the CEP • CEP reflects the regional desire for environmental cooperation; Almaty Declaration , Tehran Wrap Up Meeting etc • CEP started as early as 1998 as an inter-governmental environmental programme to safeguard the environment of the Caspian Sea. • CEP is essentially a regional umbrella programme owned by the littoral countries. • GEF and the EU/Tacis have both provided financial support and technical assistance to the CEP • Issues of concern: fisheries, habitat degradation; loss of biodiversity, oil pollution, waste management practices, water fluctuation

  3. Major Achievements Regional dialogue : • Steering Committee, Programme Coordination Unit ( PCU), five National Focal Points and a number of Caspian Regional Thematic Centres (CRTCs). • Framework Conventionagreed and signed. • EIA in regional context Guidelines developed and published • Emergency Response Cooperation Plan , Protocol and MOU developed.

  4. Major Achievements • Resource Mobilization : • Matched Small Grants Programme (MSGP)implemented • a number of Priority Investment Projects (PIPs) identified. • Diagnostic analysis & strategy and policy definition : • A Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA)developed and published • Five National Caspian Actions Plans developed and being nationally endorsed • Strategic Action Programme (SAP) developed and agreed to.

  5. CO Role • Set up of PCU (recruitment, training) • Day-to-day advisory services to PCU • Be quick and prompt to act in synchrony with other players • Act as legal entity and local advocate • Supervision and project reviews • Instead of minor administrative shared responsibility for the execution

  6. Advantages • Learning experience • Provides partnership building opportunities (entry point for private sector partnership) • Generator of project ideas • High UNDP visibility at national and regional level • Provides training opportunities (international law, disaster management, economic valuation of environment) • Valuable source of information for other projects and other actors • Increased environmental profile • Adds to programme delivery (Principal CO)

  7. Disadvantages • UNOPS execution has limitation due to absence from the country • Too heavy workload on UNDP PO especially in the first 12-18 months until PCU is up and running • Insufficient cost-recovery of 1% to Principal CO • PCU might be viewed as a separate autonomous entity detached from UNDP • Low visibility for some components (e.g. WB-executed PIPP)

  8. Lessons Learnt • More opportunities for dialogue between UNDP COs and PCU • More involvement in the CEP activities (at least in all Steering Committee Meetings) to minimize the risk of disenfranchisement • Agreement between COs on harmonizing and simplifying administration procedures • Consider alternative execution modalities (other than UNOPS) • Closer sharing of financial information and more transparency for country allocations • Mid-term evaluation (not only final) • Maintain level of flexibility for project cycle while having clear indicators of project performance

  9. Knowledge and Capacity Gaps • Human capacity is stretched for complex and dynamic project such as CEP (in UNDP AZE one Programme staff deals with two Practices) • Limited experience with management of regional cooperation projects • Negotiation skills in multi-stakeholder environment • Ability to swim in political waters

More Related