1 / 25

Some Principles of Plant Breeding Applicable to TACF

Some Principles of Plant Breeding Applicable to TACF. F. V. Hebard Research Farms Meadowview, VA Fred@acf.org www.acffarms.org. Assumptions Leading to Choice of the Backcross Method for Introgressing Blight-Resistance from Chinese into American Chestnut.

pahana
Télécharger la présentation

Some Principles of Plant Breeding Applicable to TACF

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Some Principles of Plant Breeding Applicable to TACF F. V. Hebard Research Farms Meadowview, VA Fred@acf.org www.acffarms.org

  2. Assumptions Leading to Choice of the Backcross Method for Introgressing Blight-Resistance from Chinese into American Chestnut • American chestnut lacks blight resistance. • Chinese chestnut has the highest level of blight resistance of all species sexually compatible with American chestnut. • Blight resistance from Chinese chestnut is inherited fairly simply. • American chestnut otherwise is perfectly adapted to our forests.

  3. Backcrossing Fraction Chinese C x A ¯ F1 x A ¯ B1 x A ¯ B2 x A ¯ B3 x B3 ¯ B3-F2 x B3-F2 ¯ B3-F3 1/2 1/4 1/8 1/16 1/16 1/16

  4. Backcrossing • The purpose of backcrossing is to dilute out all the traits of the Chinese chestnut tree, except blight resistance, for which we select at each generation. • The experience of plant breeders has been that, generally, three backcrosses are enough to recover the recurrent type. • The dilution of the fraction of Chinese genes with each step of backcrossing is not exact. Starting with the first backcross, the fractions given are averages over all the progeny for a cross. For instance, first backcross progeny average 1/4 Chinese, 3/4 American genes. However, individual trees can vary from 50% Chinese up to 100% American. In practice the range of variation is less, from about 65% to 85% for 100 B1 progeny, as assessed by molecular markers. Recovery of American Type

  5. Backcrossing • We can accelerate the recovery by selecting for American traits and against Chinese traits. • Currently, we select for morphological traits. • If we were to grow larger numbers of progeny, we could probably accelerate recovery even more using molecular techniques. • This would enable us to bypass several generations of backcrossing. • Our current use of morphological traits probably balances out the Chinese traits drug along by selection for resistance. Recovery of American Type

  6. Backcrossing • Chromosomal abnormalities associated with wide crosses, such as inversions and reciprocal translocations, may hinder easy introgression of small segments of Chinese chestnut chromosomes containing resistance genes but little else. • Part of the answer to problems such as these is to grow larger numbers of progeny. • Molecular techniques also may be very helpful in overcoming such possible obstacles, as well as identifying their occurrence. Recovery of American Type

  7. Expected Resistant Backcrossing # Genes 1 2 3 C x A ¯ F1 x A ¯ B1 x A ¯ B2 x A ¯ B3 x B3 ¯ B3-F2 x B3-F2  ¯ B3-F3 All All All 1/2 1/4 1/8 1/2 1/4 1/8 1/2 1/4 1/8 1/4 1/16 1/64 Most Most Most

  8. Backcrossing • Backcrossing becomes progressively more impractical as the number of genes being introgressed increases. Either so many genes will be lost during backcrossing that the trees will lack adequate levels of blight resistance or so many associated Chinese traits will be retained that the trees will lack adequate American type. • Most evidence to date indicates that only a few genes, two or three, confer blight resistance, suggesting that backcrossing will be effective. • This assessment could change with further data. Number of Genes for Blight Resistance

  9. Backcrossing • The evidence that only a few genes are involved with resistance is that: • Resistance has not decreased with successive backcrosses. • We have recovered F2 individuals with high levels of resistance at frequencies greater than about 1 in 30, and, correspondingly, • the distributions of canker sizes have been less peaked than would be expected if more than 3 genes controlled resistance. • Likewise, the tails of the distributions have been less high than would be expected if only 1 gene controlled resistance. • The increase in variance at backcross and F2, compared to homozygous parents, is compatible with 1 to 2 genes controlling resistance. • The number of major qtls for resistance on molecular maps has been limited and combinations of any two qtls have predicted high levels of resistance in progeny. • However, minor qtls also exist on molecular maps. Number of Genes for Blight Resistance

  10. BackcrossingWhy we want 100 nuts per backcross. • There is a 99% probability of getting at least one tree heterozygous for three genes with 33 progeny, .01 = (7/8)33, where 7/8 is the chance of not being homozygous for three genes for resistance. • Growing 73 trees per cross gives a 99% chance of getting at least four trees heterozygous for three genes, .01 = 7/873 + 73*7/872*1/81 + 2628*7/871*1/82 + 62196*7/870*1/83. • About 3/4ths of our planted nuts yield trees, and 73/.75 ~= 100.

  11. BackcrossingNeed more than one American parent C x A1 ¯ F1 x A2 ¯ B1 x A3 ¯ B2 x A4 ¯ B3

  12. BackcrossingNeed more than one American chestnut line C x A1 ¯ F11 x A5 ¯ B11 x A9 ¯ B21 x A13 ¯ B31 x C x A2 ¯ F12 x A6 ¯ B12 x A10 ¯ B22 x A14 ¯ B32 C x A3 ¯ F13 x A7 ¯ B13 x A11 ¯ B23 x A15 ¯ B33 x C x A4 ¯ F14 x A8 ¯ B14 x A12 ¯ B24 x A16 ¯ B34 ¯ ¯ B3-F212 B3-F234

  13. Intercrossing of Third BackcrossesWith Clapper and Graves, we started from the B1. C x A0 ¯ F11 x A00 ¯ B11 x A1 ¯ B21 x A5 ¯ B31 x B11 x A2 ¯ B22 x A6 ¯ B32 B11 x A3 ¯ B23 x A7 ¯ B33 x B11 x A4 ¯ B24 x A8 ¯ B34 ¯ ¯ B3-F212 B3-F234

  14. Intercrossing of Third BackcrossesWhy we want 20 American lines per source of resistance for each chapter. C x A0 ¯ F11 x A00 ¯ B11 x A1 ¯ B21 x A5 ¯ B31 x B11 x A2 ¯ B22 x A6 ¯ B32 B11 x A3 ¯ B23 x A7 ¯ B33 x B11 x A4 ¯ B24 x A8 ¯ B34 ¯ ¯ B3-F212 B3-F234

  15. Intercrossing of Third BackcrossesWhy we want 20 American lines per source of resistance for each chapter. • Inbreeding is an important parameter in assessing how many lines to use. • To look at inbreeding effects, we have toexamine B3-F4s, two generations further than B3-F2.

  16. Intercrossing of Third Backcross LinesComplete Diallel, No Selfing B3s ® 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ¯ B3-F2s 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 4 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 5 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 6 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 7 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 8 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88

  17. Intercrossing of Third Backcross LinesHalf Diallel, No Selfing B3s ® 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ¯ B3-F2s 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 34 35 36 37 38 4 45 46 47 48 5 56 57 58 6 67 68 7 78 8

  18. Intercrossing of Third Backcross F2sHalf Diallel, No Selfing B3-F2s ® 12 34 56 78 ¯ B3-F3s 12 12:34 12:56 12:78 34 34:56 34:78 56 56:78 78

  19. Intercrossing of Third Backcross F3sHalf Diallel, No Selfing B3-F3s ® 12:34 12:56 12:78 34:56 34:78 56:78 ¯ B3-F4s 12:34 12:34-12:56 12:34-12:78 12:34-34:56 12:34-34:78 12:34-56:78 12:56 12:56-12:78 12:56-34:56 12:56-34:78 12:56-56:78 12:78 12:78-34:56 12:78-34:78 12:78-56:78 34:56 34:56-34:78 34:56-56:78 34:78 34:78-56:78 56:78

  20. Intercrossing of Third Backcross F3sHalf Diallel, No Selfing: Inbreeding Coefficients B3-F3s ® 12:34 12:56 12:78 34:56 34:78 56:78 ¯ B3-F4s 12:34 12:34-12:56 12:34-12:78 12:34-34:56 12:34-34:78 12:34-56:78 1/8 1/8 1/8 1/8 0 12:56 12:56-12:78 12:56-34:56 12:56-34:78 12:56-56:78 1/8 1/8 0 1/8 12:78 12:78-34:56 12:78-34:78 12:78-56:78 0 1/8 1/8 34:56 34:56-34:78 34:56-56:78 1/8 1/8 34:78 34:78-56:78 1/8 56:78

  21. Intercrossing of Third BackcrossesInbreeding decreases rapidly as the number of lines increases to about 20, and then plateaus at a low level. Effect of Number and size of B3 Families (Lines) on Inbreeding at B3-F4.

  22. BackcrossingWhy we want nine selected B3-F2 trees per B3 line. • Nine progeny give us a 93% chance of obtaining both alleles at each chromosome locus from a parent, capturing most of the genetic diversity within the parent. The number, 9, comes from the following formula, assuming there are 20 independently assorting chromosome fragments: 0.93 = [1-2(1-9)]20.

  23. Population Recovery • Thus our breeding program satisfies Franklin’s famous 50/500 rule of conservation genetics, which states that the effective population size has to be at least 50 to avoid immediate collapse from inbreeding depression, and 500 for mutation to offset the long-term erosion of genetic diversity by drift.

  24. Conclusions • Approximately twenty lines in any breeding unit is enough to avoid immediate collapse of the population due to inbreeding depression. • At least nine to ten B3-F2 progeny are needed per B3 line to capture most alleles. • If each of those nine to ten sets of B3-F2 progeny is segregated in a separate orchard, inbreeding at F4 is reduced. • The American Chestnut Foundation’s breeding program will yield adequate effective population sizes (although the projections have a number of assumptions that will not hold true, decreasing the projected Ne). • Chapter breeding efforts add essential genetic diversity and local adaptation to the overall program.

More Related