190 likes | 286 Vues
1. Local Plan and evidence refresh 2. Resources and project planning. Responses to Local Plan Consultation. Agreement Ambition / Aspiration Success Principle of constrained, balanced growth USP Environmental protection Jobs emphasis Town centres More sustainable communities
E N D
1. Local Plan and evidence refresh2. Resources and project planning
Responses to Local Plan Consultation Agreement • Ambition / Aspiration • Success • Principle of constrained, balanced growth • USP • Environmental protection • Jobs emphasis • Town centres • More sustainable communities • Tourism Investment Areas • HCA support Concerns • Scale of growth • 15000 jobs unrealistic • 10,000 homes too many / few • Limit houses until jobs arise • Infrastructure constraints • Too much reliance on brownfield land • 1.5 jobs per home negative impact on viability • S Hams and TDC concerns
What the Local Plan must do: • 5 year land supply • Compliance with NPPF and Govt Growth agenda • Meet housing needs – test of soundness • Balance between jobs and homes • Stay within environmental limits • Duty to Cooperate compliant • (not duty to agree) • Be flexible – as difficult to • predict the future
Comfort for 5 years: • Plan for and focus on first 5 years – more certainty • DCLG Interim Household projections say plan for 4,400 homes over next 10 years = 440 homes p.a. = 2,200 over next 5 years • Land supply – healthy; space for 2000 homes (with PP); 350 already built; market slow / demand low, 650 windfalls projected • Opportunity for robust neighbourhood plans and masterplans looking beyond 5 years
Lock Gate approach Pool of sites / land (SHLAA & NP) 10 -15 year - developable sites (LP / NP) 5 – 10 year – viable, developable sites (LP / NP) 0 – 5 year land supply – marketable, deliverable sites (LP) – know this is sites with PP (2000) and already delivered (350) Sites move downstream if sustainability criteria met, including need, infrastructure etc ‘Lock gates’ controlled by Council and community
Progress… • Refresh of Housing evidence in response to consultation • Assessment of demand and capacity • Member discussion. Members and Mayor are adamant that balance between homes and jobs must be right in the Local Plan. The Local Plan should take a “jobs led” approach. • The SHLAA and SHMA will be evidence base reports, not Council Policy.
Demand for homes: Jobs and Homes balance • No direct arithmetic relationship; evidence refresh work has explored various options • No. of homes is a test of soundness; no. of jobs is not. • Inspector will want to ensure reasonable balance between jobs and homes • Majority of demand for new homes over next 20 years is from: - natural change within Torbay (around 3,000 new homes needed) - in-migration, predominantly retirement (around 3500 new homes needed) - economically active in migration (around 2500 new homes needed) • Need to plan positively for growth, recognising environmental and infrastructure limits • Lots of new jobs = need for lots of new homes, so need to be realistic about number of new jobs
Jobs and Homes: scenarios (detail) • All scenarios assume reduction in unemployment from 8.3% to 5.5% of workforce: about 1,700 people by 2032. PBA say this is optimistic, but agreed with TDA. • Percentage of working age population that are economically active maintained at 76%. Agreed with TDA. • Key sectors will grow (with intervention) • Household size falls from 2.17 to 2.06 in 2032. In line with latest (2011) projections, but smaller fall than previously projected. 3000 homes needed just to meet own needs • Torbay remains as self-contained as present - around 85% of jobs in Torbay are filled by Torbay residents • Growth Sectors (e.g.’s) • Tourism + 145 jobs p.a. • Business Services +90 jobs p.a. • Education +50 jobs p.a. • Health + 80 jobs p.a.
Capacity for new homes • Government message very clear – cannot prevent people from living where they want to live. • Torbay’s environment is excellent, underpins its economy and there is limited capacity. • Torbay’s historic position: capacity is around 10,000 homes • SHLAA work will help us define capacity in Torbay • Important that, in future, capacity is assessed across South Devon area – working with Teignbridge and South Hams • That shared assessment will identify sites, across S Devon, capable of accommodating future growth • On-going conversations, as part of Duty to Cooperate, with Teignbridge and South Hams.
Progress • 15 May – Council report to agree approach for Local Plan: • 8/10,000 new homes • 5/6000 net new FTE jobs (not a ceiling, maximum) • Review of plan every 5 years (with neighbouring authorities) – joint housing assessments • Clear monitoring of jobs, homes, infrastructure
Resources…investment in Torquay Neighbourhood Plan • Prince’s Foundation – 3 visits • Frontrunners Funding (DCLG) • Communities funding • Council officer support – Planning, Highways, Transport, Env. Policy, Communities, TDA • Sustainability Appraisal & HRA • Examination & Referendum • Community resource? £130,000 + Perhaps not ‘enough’
Project Planning – key stages • Developing the Plan – project groups, community resources, planning authority advice and external help? • Consultation– engagement strategy – costs could vary hugely • Publication – paid for by Council • Examination – paid for by Council • Referendum – paid for by Council but campaigning costs for Forum
Further support? • Locality funding – direct support, grant support or both • Grant– up to £7,000 • Deadline to submit bids within next few weeks • All 3 Neighbourhood Forums are co-ordinating bids • Other support – sponsorship, community resources?
Local Plan/Neighbourhood Plan relationship • Basic conditions: Neighbourhood Plan must be in ‘broad conformity’ with Local Plan • Torbay approach – Neighbourhood Plans with ‘teeth’, dealing with big issues. Parrallel-track with Local Plan. • Could adopt Neighbourhood Plan ahead of Local Plan but risky • Neighbourhood Plan should follow the Local Plan
Timetable for Local Plan • Clear framework agreed by Council 15 May • Re-drafting of Local Plan - May/June/July • Consultation – Aug/Sep • Submission to Sec. of State - Oct • Examination of Local Plan end of 2013 and early 2014 (7 months) • Adopt Local Plan – June 2014
Neighbourhood Plan – remaining stages • Develop the final draft Neighbourhood Plan • Consultation – 6 weeks • Analyse responses, editing Neighbourhood Plan • Submission to Torbay Council - June 2014 • Publication – 6 weeks – June 2014 • Examination – Sep 2014 • Referendum – Nov 2014 However, Local Plan and Neighbourhood Plan carry increasing weight as they progress towards adoption
Neighbourhood Planning – influence • Content of draft Local Plan – SWOT’s, aspirations, growth • Evidence base refresh – SHLAA/SHMA • TDA capital projects • Planning applications • Council priorities
Developing the Neighbourhood Plan • Good progress – consider using external help, keep Strategic Planning involved closely • Our advice – keep it simple. The first 5 year of housing is ‘banked’. • Put the ‘hooks’ in to deliver real place-making change through masterplanning of key areas – e.g. Town Centre, The Gateway getting best value for community • Use the CIL receipts and ‘planning gain’ to deliver community projects in your plan