1 / 10

MIT Communications Futures Program

MIT Communications Futures Program. Fall 2013 Plenary . Morning 8:45 What’s the Internet For, Anyway? Dave Clark, MIT CSAIL Panel: Rob Hunter, ESPN Sam Chernak , Comcast Hannu Flinck , Nokia Siemens Networks Tessa Sproule , CBC Digital 9:45 Break

paniz
Télécharger la présentation

MIT Communications Futures Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MIT Communications Futures Program Fall 2013 Plenary

  2. Morning • 8:45 What’s the Internet For, Anyway? • Dave Clark, MIT CSAIL • Panel: • Rob Hunter, ESPN • Sam Chernak, Comcast • HannuFlinck, Nokia Siemens Networks • Tessa Sproule, CBC Digital • 9:45 Break • 10:00 Ultimate Media, Andy Lippman, Henry Holtzman, Mike Bove, MIT Media Lab • 11:00 Visions of the Wireless Future: Insights into Emerging Technologies, Dina Katabi, • Wireless Center @ MIT • 11:45 Lunch • Afternoon • 12:45 Media and Telecom: The Canadian Experience • Ana Serrano, Canadian Film Centre • Tessa Sproule, CBC Digital • Caitlin O’Donovan, Corus Entertainment • 1:45 Break • 2:00 Money Flows in the Internet Ecosystem, • Dave Clark, MIT CSAIL • 2:45 Mobile Broadband Working Group, Dave Clark, MIT CSAIL • 3:15 Break • 3:30 Sports over IP, Charlie Fine, MIT Sloan • 4:15 Trust Frameworks, Karen Sollins, MIT CSAIL • 4:45 Next steps Today’s Agenda

  3. What is the Internet for, anyway? David Clark MIT CFP October, 2013

  4. Well-known history • Internet started out as non-commercial tool for interconnection of research computers (and interconnection of researchers). • DARPA and NSF • Backbone became commercial in mid-1990’s. • The Web proved a powerful platform for all sorts of activities. • Commercial experiments evolved. • Goal was generality. • Both hosts and applications.

  5. Today • Most activities are “commercially facilitated”. • Wide range of behaviors. • Provisioning of Internet is cheap but not free. • Engineering of lower layers is influenced by high-volume uses. • Streaming content. • Is this what the Internet is now “for”?

  6. Value • Even in the pre-commercial world, what mattered was that which was valued by the users. • Discussion about “value” is not just a commercial discussion. • Discussion of “capturing value” is. • Content is not king, the user is king. • To paraphrase an old marketing saying.

  7. What do users value? • Concretely: their favorite apps. • Facebook, twitter, Netflix, etc. • Shopping on line • Email, if you are old. • A rich and diverse space of experiences. • Abstractly (and more importantly) • Availability, reach, generality, performance, ease of use, trustworthy character. • The ordering may be debated… • Test case: rural regions. • The non-users talk about lack of value. • As well as cost, lack of skills, fear, etc.

  8. Its not just commerce • We should value the non-commercial uses of the Internet. • Do not lose track of “public and social goods” in the rush to commercialization. • Public sector investment is justified on this basis. • But they have to get paid for somehow. • In many cases, they can “free ride” on the commercially supported infrastructure.

  9. Other answers • Innovation and economic growth. • A popular theme in Washington right now. • The word “innovation” occurs 260 times in the FCC National Broadband Plan. • Efficiency and cost reduction. • Companies love this. • Surveillance • Convergence helped a lot…

  10. Asking the right question • Perhaps asking “What is the Internet for?” is the wrong question. • Perhaps we should ask “What are the barriers to meeting the needs of the user?” • Availability, reach, generality, performance, ease of use, trustworthy character. • Which actors must deal with these issues? • To what extent are the barriers economic?

More Related