1 / 31

Preliminary Data Analysis of Empowerment Tool Validity and Reliability – Athens 2011

This document presents the preliminary data analysis of an empowerment tool tested for validity and reliability using a diverse sample of beneficiaries. Key findings explore score distributions, and variations across member states, genders, age groups, and economic statuses. We compare results with other tools like the Rickter Scale and highlight significant differences and characteristics of the sample. Cautions regarding political, economic contexts, and sample sizes are discussed. Despite varied timelines and contexts, the findings suggest the tool's potential as a comparative evaluation resource.

parley
Télécharger la présentation

Preliminary Data Analysis of Empowerment Tool Validity and Reliability – Athens 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Athens June 2011 EMPOWERMENT TOOL: PRELIMINARY DATA ANALYSIS

  2. Preliminary Testing of Validity and Reliability of the Tool based on a sample of Beneficiaries • Complement to Focus Group Activity • Key Questions about the Findings: • Could the Distributions of Scores concur be Anticipated – If not, Do They Make Sense? • How can the differences be explained between: • Member states; • Genders; • Age groups; • Those of differing economic status. • How do the Findings compare with those from Other Tools (Rickter Scale?)

  3. Characteristics of the Sample

  4. Most Significant Differences – Member States

  5. Other Differences

  6. Comparison with the Ricker Scale

  7. Ashton Community Trust

  8. Tentative Conclusions • Cautions: • Different Political, Economic & Contexts; • Consistency of Application; • Subsamples of different size - UKni 50% of Sample; • The Gender Puzzle; • Different Timeline for Beneficiaries. • But: • Useful Research Data; • Possible Evaluation Tool – though Projects Adapt; • Comparable to Recognised Tool (Rickter Scale).

More Related