1 / 30

CAMISEA OPERATIONS August, 2007

CAMISEA OPERATIONS August, 2007. CAMISEA Operations Performance. OPERATIONS EFFECTIVENESS COMPONENTS (KPI’s) OVERALL EQUIPMENT EFFECTIVENESS (OEE) MALVINAS OEE PISCO OEE RELIABILITY BENCH SAFETY RECORDS. INDEX. OPERATIONS EFFECTIVENESS COMPONENTS (KPI’s).

paul
Télécharger la présentation

CAMISEA OPERATIONS August, 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CAMISEA OPERATIONS August, 2007

  2. CAMISEA Operations Performance

  3. OPERATIONS EFFECTIVENESS COMPONENTS (KPI’s) OVERALL EQUIPMENT EFFECTIVENESS (OEE) MALVINAS OEE PISCO OEE RELIABILITY BENCH SAFETY RECORDS INDEX

  4. OPERATIONS EFFECTIVENESS COMPONENTS(KPI’s) Utilization / Production / Throughput (Gas) Availability Reliability Yield / Recovery (C3) (As a rule of thumb, “World-class performers” will only have losses of between 1.5 % to 2 % for all indicators) KPI´s : Key Performance Indicators

  5. Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) Objective method to link three performance indicators: • Availability • Throughput • Yield / Recovery

  6. Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) Can be expressed simply: • OEE = Yield x Throughput x Availability • The Maximun Theoretical World Class - OEE > 85%

  7. Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) OEE = Availability X Throughput X Recovery (C3) (Plant Unit) (Gas) Hr Operatives Actual Throughput Actual yield (C3) Vs Vs Vs Hr Calendars Best Demonstrated Max Theoretical yield Rate (BDR) (for BDR) (96 %) (500 MMSCFD) (97.2%)

  8. Estabiliz. Equim. Level nC 1, 2, 3 Cry I Equim. Level; TC I TEx I Cry II Equim. Level; TC II TEx II Malvinas Operations Plant Level Overall: O Equipment: E Effectiveness: E OEE = A x P x R Unit Level Unit Level Unit Level Availability Production Recovery (yield) Asset Plant Level X X

  9. OVERALL OEE = (OEE 1 + OEE 2) • 2 • PISCO AxTxY AxTxY • Fract Topp PISCO OEEPLANT LEVEL / OVERALL OEE • LPG FRACTIONATION UNIT • OEE 1 (Fract) • TOPPING UNIT • OEE 2 (Topp)

  10. OEE 1 FRACTIONATION UNIT • THROUGHPUT Actual Throughput Vs NGL received from Malvinas

  11. OEE 1 FRACTIONATION UNIT • RECOVERY (Yield) C3/C4 Actual Yield Vs Design Yield (97.93% Vol) Actual Yield Vs Design Yield (99.21 % Vol) C3 C4

  12. OEE 1-2 FRACTIONATION AND TOPPING UNITS • AVAILABILITY Hs Operatives (Hs Run) Vs Hs Calendars

  13. OEE 2 TOPPING UNIT • THROUGHPUT Actual Throughput Vs (NGL received from Malvinas) x 0.54 0.54 = design fraction of condensate in NGL from Malvinas

  14. Reliability • Unplanned downtime (Reactive Maintenance) • Maintenance Backlog Hs Operations Vs Hs Operations + Hs TMR (TMR: “Total Maintenance Reactive”) (Reliability; “World Class performers” > 98%)

  15. RELIABILITY 2006 MALVINAS99% (Average of 24 main equipments: Turbocompressors,Turbogenerators, Turboexpanders, Pumps, Control System) PISCO97.8% (Average of 20 main equipments: Turbogenerators, Pumps, Control System, Generators, Compressors)

  16. Malvinas Operations – OEE 2006 Plant Level

  17. Malvinas Operations – OEE 2007 Plant Level

  18. Pisco Operations – OEE 2006 – Plant Level

  19. Pisco Operations – OEE 2007 Plant Level

  20. BENCH

  21. The Reliability Involves Four Stable Operating Domains (Source: Ledet Enterprises, Houston – Texas) OEE Mal 0.94 OEE Pis 0.93

  22. Maintenance Cost Vs. Production Reliability 2007 Malvinas Pisco Maintenance Cost vs. Production reliability. Plants with the best overall equipment effectiveness tend to have the lowest maintenance cost and use systematic failure elimination, profit-centered maintenance and performance contracting.

  23. Data from the 1998 and 2000 Solomon Associates Inc. surveys of the participating North and South American refining companies

  24. As a rule of thumb, “World-class performers” will only have losses of between 1.5 % to 2 % for all indicators “world-class performers” are operating at > 85% of BDR Reliability; “World Class performers” > 98% Availability: “world class performers” > 96 % Unavailability – both timing and duration – must be predictable. There must be no surprises

  25. References OIL & GAS JOURNAL / May 9, 2005 “OEE Method Improves Condition Based Maintenance Aspen Technology Inc. , Houston – Texas HYDROCARBON PROCESSING / January 2005 “Achieving World-Class Operating Performance” Polaris Veritas Inc. , Houston – Texas Data from the 1998 and 2000 Solomon Associates Inc. surveys of the participating North and South American refining companies - Toward World Class Plant Availability – Tom Ratajczak – UOP LLC

  26. SAFETY RECORDS

  27. SAFETY MALVINAS

  28. SAFETY MALVINAS

  29. SAFETY PISCO

  30. SAFETY PISCO 2’077,302

More Related