Download
the logic of social science research n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
The Logic of Social Science Research PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
The Logic of Social Science Research

The Logic of Social Science Research

357 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

The Logic of Social Science Research

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. The Logic of Social Science Research A lecture by Sociology 3522 29 Jan. 2008 Dr Christopher Kollmeyer

  2. Epistemology: How do we know when something is true? • Natural Sciences  Scientific Method • Social Sciences 3Research Orientations • Positivism (often quantitative research) • Interpretivism (often qualitative research) • Realism

  3. The Scientific Method Falsification Support or Refute Theory Research Question Unexplained Phenomenon Hypothesis Observable Prediction Theory Tentative Explanation Experiment

  4. Other Characteristics of the Scientific Method: • Falsification • Karl Popper (1959) “The Logic of Scientific Discovery” • Either reject or support hypothesis, but never “prove” it • Not falsifiable = philosophical question • Verifiability (Replication) • Repeatable (hopefully with same results)  peer reviewed • Science is Dynamic • Scientific ‘laws’ = Theory and facts match over numerous experiments • But ‘laws’ can be overturned with new evidence  knowledge changes

  5. Key Epistemological Question for the Social Sciences: Can the social world be studied with the same methods used in the natural sciences? • YES  Positivism (Emile Durkheim) • Typically Deductive Research • NO Interpretivism or Verstehen (Max Weber) • Typically Inductive Research • YES Realism (Karl Mark, Sigmund Freud) • No methodological preference

  6. Social Science Tradition (1):Positivism • Knowledge derived from observations (empiricism) • Theory alone is not scientific knowledge  philosophy • Scientific knowledge: theories supported by data • Research is deductive Theory  Hypothesis  Collect Data  Findings   Findings confirm or reject hypothesis  Revise theory • Social science should be value free • Social scientist’s personal opinions shouldn’t matter

  7. Building Blocks of Positivism: Theories, Hypotheses, and Variables Theory: Plausible explanation for a particular social phenomenon. Theory explains the ‘causal relationship’ between social variables. The data determine the ‘correlation between variables’. Spurious theories Founding Theories of Sociology Karl Marx (Capitalism and Society) Max Weber (Religion and Capitalism) Emile Durkheim (DOL and Anomie)

  8. Variables: An important “object” within a theory that can take on two or more different values or categories. Examples of Sociological Variables: Economic systems: capitalism, socialism, mixed economies. Social Class: upper class, middle class, working class, lower class. Gender: male, female (perhaps transgendered) Age: Education:

  9. Measurement Validity Proxies: A variable that represents (albeit imperfectly) a more complicated sociological concept. Proxies enable researchers to measure abstract social phenomena. Examples: Concept PossibleProxy Community disorder ---- ASBOs issued per year Gender Equality -- Gender pay gap Political participation --- Voter participation rates National Prosperity --- Income per capita

  10. Hypothesis: A short and empirically testable statement, derived from theory, which predicts a certain outcome. Possible hypotheses for classical theories in sociology: Marx: The more the economy is privately owned, the more economic inequality will grow in that society. Weber: Protestant-dominated countries have stronger economies than Catholic-dominated countries. Durkheim: The more advanced a society’s division of labor, the more people in that society will suffer from anomie. Important note: All of these hypotheses can be tested; thus they are said to be ‘falsifiable’.

  11. In-Class Exercise: 1) Write out a one sentence hypothesis that offers a plausible explanation for the following social problems: poverty gender inequality in the workplace anti-social behavior among teenagers 2) Identify the variables in your hypotheses 3) How you would measure these variables?