1 / 12

Assessment Team Update

Assessment Team Update. Dhaneshwar Lall March 16, 2006. Best Assessment Processes VIII. Symposium conducted Feb 26-28, 2006 at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in Terre Haute IN. Approximately 300 attendees from many states and several countries. Using the Advisory Board.

penney
Télécharger la présentation

Assessment Team Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assessment Team Update Dhaneshwar Lall March 16, 2006

  2. Best Assessment Processes VIII • Symposium conducted Feb 26-28, 2006 at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in Terre Haute IN. • Approximately 300 attendees from many states and several countries.

  3. Using the Advisory Board • Development of contemporary curricula by matching actual practice applications with theoretical and research based topics • Strengthening links between dept. and practitioner constituencies • Assistance in curricula quality control • Suggestions in current and evolving needs in research • Generating external financial support • Collecting assessment data

  4. Issues • Student gets an “A” in course, but ‘fails’ an outcome  From a program standpoint that is OK! • Should students who fail a particular PO get an accredited degree?

  5. Measures • Capstone – realistic clients asking realistic questions and concerns. • Portfolios – may include evidence of many things to be assessed BUT may be time-consuming. • Focus groups – need trained moderator • Simulations/Case studies – students have to consider different things that go into a project e.g. impact on society, effect on surrounding etc.

  6. Lifelong learning • May have to use tools since this may not be an explicit topic. • One aspect may be assessing if students can “independent learn.” • Active participation in their respective societies. • Exit interview use – questions about the student’s commitment may be addressed here by askin relevant questions.

  7. Self study • Valuable information for evaluating team before visit • No campus time limited • Facts and data organized and interpreted • Identifies issues to institution before the visit • Can be addressed early by institution • May be resolved before visit • MOST COMMON SHORTCOMING – lacking specific examples of CQI and “Closing the Loop.”

  8. Displays • Need to be interpreted • Organized according to a-k OR associated outcomes mapped to a-k [NOT BY COURSE] • PEOs, Goals, Assessment, and CQI should be prominent

  9. ABET changes/notes.1 • Direct evidence valued higher • Reiteration of using a documented process for CQI • CQI is a PERMANENT process • Can use unique outcomes that reflect your program • Define terminology used • Materials lead evaluators through the evidence

  10. ABET changes/notes.2 • Narrative piece • Show evaluator how each criterion is satisfied • Accompany data with interpretations • Show that Evaluation/Assessment processes are working • Show evidence of assessment, data reduction, analysis, and follow-up actions

  11. ABET changes/notes.3 • Use of long term and short term cycles • Each criteria linked/mapped all the way to the CQI process • Meticulously document program improvements AND the triggering event(s). This shows that there is a process as opposed to ad hoc only.

  12. MEET • Changes made to: • 13 EET courses, • 2 MET courses • Some downtime in previous weeks for updates • Spring 2006 edition will be ready for release early next week

More Related